↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET063+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:20 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.34s 1.26s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   37 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   94 (   2 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  102 (  45   ~;  38   |;  13   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   5 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   60 (   0 sgn  57   !;   3   ?;  12   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X0)
         => member(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( equal_set(X0,X1)
    <=> ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',equal_set) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X0,intersection(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X0,X2)
        & member(X0,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',intersection) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : ~ member(X0,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',empty_set) ).

fof(f12,conjecture,
    ! [X0] : equal_set(intersection(X0,empty_set),empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thI17) ).

fof(f13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] : equal_set(intersection(X0,empty_set),empty_set),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f12]) ).

fof(f14,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( subset(X1,X0)
        & subset(X0,X1) )
     => equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(unused_predicate_definition_removal,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f15,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ~ member(X2,X0)
          | member(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f16,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f14]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f19,plain,
    ? [X0] : ~ equal_set(intersection(X0,empty_set),empty_set),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f13]) ).

fof(f20,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ member(X2,X0)
            | member(X2,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X0)
            & ~ member(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f21,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X0)
            | member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X0)
            & ~ member(X2,X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f20]) ).

fof(f22,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X0)
            | member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ( member(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
          & ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
        | subset(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0,X1))],[f21]) ).

fof(f24,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2))
        | ( member(X0,X2)
          & member(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ member(X0,X2)
        | ~ member(X0,X1)
        | member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

fof(f25,plain,
    ! [X0,X1,X2] :
      ( ( ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2))
        | ( member(X0,X2)
          & member(X0,X1) ) )
      & ( ~ member(X0,X2)
        | ~ member(X0,X1)
        | member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f24]) ).

fof(f39,plain,
    ~ equal_set(intersection(sK3,empty_set),empty_set),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK3]),skolemize(X0,sK3)],[f19]) ).

fof(f41,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f42,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1)
      | subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).

fof(f43,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | equal_set(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2))
      | member(X0,X2) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ! [X0] : ~ member(X0,empty_set),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f67,plain,
    ~ equal_set(intersection(sK3,empty_set),empty_set),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f39]) ).

tcf(c_49,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f42]) ).

tcf(c_50,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subset(X0,X1)
      | member(sK0(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f41]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( equal_set(X0,X1)
      | ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f43]) ).

tcf(c_57,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

tcf(c_61,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : ~ member(X0,empty_set),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f52]) ).

tcf(c_76,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_set(intersection(sK3,empty_set),empty_set),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f67]) ).

tcf(c_422,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( ~ subset(X1,X0)
      | ~ subset(X0,X1)
      | ( X1 != empty_set )
      | ( intersection(sK3,empty_set) != X0 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_76]) ).

tcf(c_423,plain,
    ( ~ subset(empty_set,intersection(sK3,empty_set))
    | ~ subset(intersection(sK3,empty_set),empty_set) ),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_422]) ).

tcf(c_1428,plain,
    ( subset(intersection(sK3,empty_set),empty_set)
    | ~ member(sK0(intersection(sK3,empty_set),empty_set),empty_set) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_49]) ).

tcf(c_1429,plain,
    ( subset(intersection(sK3,empty_set),empty_set)
    | member(sK0(intersection(sK3,empty_set),empty_set),intersection(sK3,empty_set)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

tcf(c_1871,plain,
    ( subset(empty_set,intersection(sK3,empty_set))
    | member(sK0(empty_set,intersection(sK3,empty_set)),empty_set) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).

tcf(c_1952,plain,
    ~ member(sK0(empty_set,intersection(sK3,empty_set)),empty_set),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_61]) ).

tcf(c_2039,plain,
    ( member(sK0(intersection(sK3,empty_set),empty_set),empty_set)
    | ~ member(sK0(intersection(sK3,empty_set),empty_set),intersection(sK3,empty_set)) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_57]) ).

tcf(c_2041,plain,
    $false,
    inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_2039,c_1952,c_1871,c_1429,c_1428,c_423]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET063+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:31:28 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.39  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.39  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.40  
% 0.13/0.40  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.42  % Proving...
% 3.34/1.26  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/1.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.34/1.26  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.34/1.26  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % 
% 3.34/1.26  % clauses                               27
% 3.34/1.26  % conjectures                           0
% 3.34/1.26  % EPR                                   2
% 3.34/1.26  % Horn                                  22
% 3.34/1.26  % unary                                 4
% 3.34/1.26  % binary                                16
% 3.34/1.26  % lits                                  57
% 3.34/1.26  % lits eq                               3
% 3.34/1.26  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.34/1.26  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.34/1.26  % fd_cond                               0
% 3.34/1.26  % fd_pseudo_cond                        2
% 3.34/1.26  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ no conjectures: strip conj schedule 
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" stripped conjectures Time Limit: 10.
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ 
% 3.34/1.26  % Current options:
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ 
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % 
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % ------ Proving...
% 3.34/1.26  % 
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.34/1.26  
% 3.34/1.26  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------