↑ Up

Zipperpin---2.1.9999.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : SET063-7 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fOKPeYv3Xx true

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Oct  2 04:51:24 PM UTC 2025

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.56s 0.79s
% Output   : Refutation 0.56s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.12  % Problem  : SET063-7 : TPTP v9.2.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.fOKPeYv3Xx true
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Wed Oct  1 13:21:08 EDT 2025
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35  % Running in FO mode
% 0.54/0.65  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.54/0.65  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.54/0.65  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.55/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.75  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.56/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.56/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.79  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.56/0.79  % Solved by fo/fo3_bce.sh.
% 0.56/0.79  % BCE start: 49
% 0.56/0.79  % BCE eliminated: 2
% 0.56/0.79  % PE start: 47
% 0.56/0.79  logic: eq
% 0.56/0.79  % PE eliminated: 11
% 0.56/0.79  % done 12 iterations in 0.024s
% 0.56/0.79  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.56/0.79  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.56/0.79  thf(null_class_type, type, null_class: $i).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(x_type, type, x: $i).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(subclass_type, type, subclass: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(prove_corollary_of_null_class_is_subclass_1, conjecture,
% 0.56/0.79    (~( subclass @ x @ null_class ))).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture, (subclass @ x @ null_class),
% 0.56/0.79    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)],
% 0.56/0.79              [prove_corollary_of_null_class_is_subclass_1])).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl48, plain, ( (subclass @ x @ null_class)),
% 0.56/0.79      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(subclass_implies_equal, axiom,
% 0.56/0.79    (( ~( subclass @ X @ Y ) ) | ( ~( subclass @ Y @ X ) ) | ( ( X ) = ( Y ) ))).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 0.56/0.79      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.56/0.79         (~ (subclass @ X0 @ X1) | ~ (subclass @ X1 @ X0) | ((X0) = (X1)))),
% 0.56/0.79      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [subclass_implies_equal])).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl221, plain,
% 0.56/0.79      ((((x) = (null_class)) | ~ (subclass @ null_class @ x))),
% 0.56/0.79      inference('sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl48, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(null_class_is_subclass, axiom, (subclass @ null_class @ X)).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl46, plain, (![X0 : $i]:  (subclass @ null_class @ X0)),
% 0.56/0.79      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [null_class_is_subclass])).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl224, plain, (((x) = (null_class))),
% 0.56/0.79      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl221, zip_derived_cl46])).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(prove_corollary_of_null_class_is_subclass_2, conjecture,
% 0.56/0.79    (( x ) = ( null_class ))).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(zf_stmt_1, negated_conjecture, (( x ) != ( null_class )),
% 0.56/0.79    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)],
% 0.56/0.79              [prove_corollary_of_null_class_is_subclass_2])).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl47, plain, (((x) != (null_class))),
% 0.56/0.79      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_1])).
% 0.56/0.79  thf(zip_derived_cl225, plain, ($false),
% 0.56/0.79      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 0.56/0.79                [zip_derived_cl224, zip_derived_cl47])).
% 0.56/0.79  
% 0.56/0.79  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.56/0.79  
% 0.56/0.79  
% 0.56/0.80  % Terminating...
% 0.60/0.85  % Runner terminated.
% 1.83/0.86  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------