↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET064-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:06:44 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.11s 0.37s
% Output   : Refutation 0.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    2
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    6 (   4 unt;   1 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :    8 (   2 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    3 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X,Y),X)
    | subclass(X,Y) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(corollary_of_null_class_is_subclass,axiom,
    ( ~ subclass(X,null_class)
    | X = null_class ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_of_null_class_is_subclass) ).

cnf(prove_null_class_is_unique_1,negated_conjecture,
    z != null_class,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_null_class_is_unique_1) ).

cnf(prove_null_class_is_unique_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(not_subclass_element(z,null_class),z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_null_class_is_unique_2) ).

cnf(121,plain,
    ~ subclass(z,null_class),
    inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[corollary_of_null_class_is_subclass,prove_null_class_is_unique_1]) ).

cnf(135,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members1,prove_null_class_is_unique_2]),121]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.07  % Problem  : SET064-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.07/0.26  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.07/0.26  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.07/0.26  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.07/0.26  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.07/0.26  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.07/0.26  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.07/0.26  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 02:34:17 EDT 2022
% 0.07/0.26  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.33  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.34  * 
% 0.11/0.34  * 
% 0.11/0.34  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.11/0.34  * 
% 0.11/0.34  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.11/0.34  * 
% 0.11/0.34  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.11/0.34   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.11/0.34   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.11/0.34   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.11/0.34   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.11/0.34   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.11/0.34   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.11/0.34   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.11/0.34   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.11/0.34   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.11/0.34   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.11/0.34   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.11/0.34   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.11/0.34  * 
% 0.11/0.34  "."
% 0.11/0.34  * 
% 0.11/0.34  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T02:34:17
% 0.11/0.34  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n017.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T02:34:17
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  #||
% 0.11/0.37  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.37  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.11/0.37  ||#
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.11/0.37  ;       174 formulas have been input or derived (from 36 formulas).
% 0.11/0.37  ;       135 (78%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.11/0.37  ;           14 (10%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.11/0.37  ;          121 (90%) are still being kept.
% 0.11/0.37  ; 
% 0.11/0.37  ; Run time in seconds:
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.008  25%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.002   6%   Assert                       (107 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.005  16%   Process new row              (148 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.001   3%   Resolution                   (70 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.001   3%   Paramodulation               (35 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (2 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.000   0%   Condensing                   (74 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.001   3%   Forward subsumption          (74 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.001   3%   Backward subsumption         (72 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.000   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (33 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.001   3%   Forward simplification       (147 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.001   3%   Backward simplification      (123 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.000   0%   Ordering                     (44 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.011  34%   Other
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.032        Total
% 0.11/0.37  ;     0.033        Real time
% 0.11/0.37  ; 
% 0.11/0.37  ; Term-hash-array has 288 terms in all.
% 0.11/0.37  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 72 entries (72 at peak, 72 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.11/0.37  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 311 nodes (311 at peak, 311 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.11/0.37  ;  Retrieved 32 possibly forward subsuming rows in 74 calls.
% 0.11/0.37  ;  Retrieved 6 possibly backward subsumed rows in 72 calls.
% 0.11/0.37  ; Path-index has 294 entries (294 at peak, 297 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.11/0.37  ; Path-index has 1,038 nodes (1,038 at peak, 1,041 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.11/0.37  ; Trie-index has 294 entries (294 at peak, 297 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.11/0.37  ; Trie-index has 835 nodes (835 at peak, 842 added, 7 deleted).
% 0.11/0.37  ; Retrieved 69 generalization terms in 292 calls.
% 0.11/0.37  ; Retrieved 71 instance terms in 50 calls.
% 0.11/0.37  ; Retrieved 755 unifiable terms in 163 calls.
% 0.11/0.37  ; 
% 0.11/0.37  ; The agenda of rows to process has 2 entries:
% 0.11/0.37  ;     1 with value 5               1 with value 12
% 0.11/0.37  ; The agenda of input rows to give has 70 entries:
% 0.11/0.37  ;     9 with value 11              3 with value 17               1 with value 27
% 0.11/0.37  ;     9 with value 12              4 with value 18               2 with value 30
% 0.11/0.37  ;    10 with value 13              1 with value 19               1 with value 31
% 0.11/0.37  ;     6 with value 14              4 with value 20               1 with value 34
% 0.11/0.37  ;     6 with value 15              3 with value 21               2 with value 35
% 0.11/0.37  ;     4 with value 16              3 with value 22               1 with value 50
% 0.11/0.37  ; The agenda of rows to give has 16 entries:
% 0.11/0.37  ;     1 with value (4 4)           2 with value (4 8)            3 with value (4 10)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     2 with value (4 5)           1 with value (4 9)            2 with value (4 13)
% 0.11/0.37  ;     5 with value (4 7)
% 0.11/0.37  Evaluation took:
% 0.11/0.37    0.033 seconds of real time
% 0.11/0.37    0.029698 seconds of user run time
% 0.11/0.37    0.003755 seconds of system run time
% 0.11/0.37    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.11/0.37    0 page faults and
% 0.11/0.37    3,393,896 bytes consed.
% 0.11/0.37  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.11/0.37  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T02:34:17
% 0.11/0.37  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.11/0.37  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------