↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET064-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.88s 1.06s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.88s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  11 unt;   1 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   26 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   16 (  10   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    3 (   3 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    7 (   0 sgn   7   !;   0   ?;   3   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

fof(f115,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( X0 = null_class
      | ~ subclass(X0,null_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_of_null_class_is_subclass) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( null_class = X0
      | ~ subclass(X0,null_class) ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f115]) ).

fof(f117,negated_conjecture,
    z != null_class,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_null_class_is_unique_1) ).

fof(f118,plain,
    null_class != z,
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f117]) ).

fof(f119,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(not_subclass_element(z,null_class),z),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_null_class_is_unique_2) ).

tcf(c_157,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
      | member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

tcf(c_244,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = null_class )
      | ~ subclass(X0,null_class) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f116]) ).

tcf(c_245,negated_conjecture,
    null_class != z,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).

tcf(c_246,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(not_subclass_element(z,null_class),z),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f119]) ).

tcf(c_2899,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = not_subclass_element(z,null_class),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_2900,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(iPr_def_10,z),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_246,c_2899]) ).

tcf(c_2901,negated_conjecture,
    null_class != z,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_245]) ).

tcf(c_3782,plain,
    ( subclass(z,null_class)
    | member(iPr_def_10,z) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2899,c_157]) ).

tcf(c_3785,plain,
    subclass(z,null_class),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3782,c_2900]) ).

tcf(c_3810,plain,
    null_class = z,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3785,c_244]) ).

tcf(c_3811,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_3810,c_2901]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.01  % Problem  : SET064-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.02  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.29  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.03/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.03/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.03/0.29  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.03/0.29  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.03/0.29  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.03/0.29  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.03/0.29  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:32:16 UTC 2026
% 0.03/0.29  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.03/0.29  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.03/0.31  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.03/0.32  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.03/0.32  
% 0.03/0.32  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.03/0.32  
% 0.03/0.32  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.06/0.33  % Proving...
% 2.88/1.06  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.88/1.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.88/1.06  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.88/1.06  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ Proving...
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % 
% 2.88/1.06  % clauses                               82
% 2.88/1.06  % conjectures                           2
% 2.88/1.06  % EPR                                   18
% 2.88/1.06  % Horn                                  72
% 2.88/1.06  % unary                                 21
% 2.88/1.06  % binary                                37
% 2.88/1.06  % lits                                  173
% 2.88/1.06  % lits eq                               26
% 2.88/1.06  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.88/1.06  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.88/1.06  % fd_cond                               4
% 2.88/1.06  % fd_pseudo_cond                        6
% 2.88/1.06  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ 
% 2.88/1.06  % Current options:
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ 
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % 
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % ------ Proving...
% 2.88/1.06  % 
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.88/1.06  
% 2.88/1.06  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------