↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET065+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:35 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.09s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.09s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   34 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   26 (   9   ~;   6   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   1 sgn   8   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subclass_defn,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( subclass(X,Y)
    <=> ! [U] :
          ( member(U,X)
         => member(U,Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subclass_defn) ).

fof(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    ! [X] : subclass(X,universal_class),
    file('theBenchmark.p',class_elements_are_sets) ).

fof(inductive_defn,axiom,
    ! [X] :
      ( inductive(X)
    <=> ( subclass(image(successor_relation,X),X)
        & member(null_class,X) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',inductive_defn) ).

fof(infinity,axiom,
    ? [X] :
      ( ! [Y] :
          ( inductive(Y)
         => subclass(X,Y) )
      & inductive(X)
      & member(X,universal_class) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',infinity) ).

fof(null_class_is_a_set,conjecture,
    member(null_class,universal_class),
    file('theBenchmark.p',null_class_is_a_set) ).

fof(null_class_is_a_set_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[null_class_is_a_set]) ).

cnf(c_45,plain,
    ( member(null_class,A)
    | ~ inductive(A) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[inductive_defn]) ).

fof(nnf_28,plain,
    ? [X] :
      ( ! [Y] :
          ( subclass(X,Y)
          | ~ inductive(Y) )
      & inductive(X)
      & member(X,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[infinity]) ).

fof(sk_infinity,plain,
    ( ! [Y] :
        ( subclass(sK0,Y)
        | ~ inductive(Y) )
    & inductive(sK0)
    & member(sK0,universal_class) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X,sK0)],[nnf_28]) ).

cnf(c_46,plain,
    inductive(sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_infinity]) ).

cnf(c_62,plain,
    member(null_class,sK0),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_46,c_45]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[null_class_is_a_set_neg]) ).

cnf(c_136,plain,
    subclass(A,universal_class),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[class_elements_are_sets]) ).

cnf(c_139,plain,
    ( member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | ~ subclass(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(c_426,plain,
    ( member(null_class,A)
    | ~ subclass(sK0,A) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_62]) ).

cnf(c_427,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(sK0,universal_class),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_426,c_64]) ).

cnf(c_425,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_136,c_427]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET065+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:03:52 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.36  % Process 4002242 was started by sandbox on n018,
% 0.09/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 07:03:52 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.38  
% 0.09/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.09/0.40  % Length of proof is 12.
% 0.09/0.40  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.09/0.40  % Maximum clause weight is 14.000.
% 0.09/0.40  % Given clauses 83.
% 0.09/0.40  
% 0.09/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------