↑ Up

SOS---2.0.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:15:12 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 2.22s 2.43s
% Output   : Refutation 2.22s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.12  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 23:57:27 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.12/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n011.cluster.edu,
% 0.12/0.36  Sun Jul 10 23:57:27 2022
% 0.12/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 22634.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.12/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.12/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  formula_list(usable).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=4.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.12/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.12/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.12/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.12/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.12/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 120 during input processing: 0 [copy,120,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.12/0.36  120 back subsumes 69.
% 0.12/0.36  
% 0.12/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.18/0.56  
% 0.18/0.56  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.18/0.56  
% 0.18/0.56  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.18/0.56  
% 0.18/0.56  
% 0.18/0.56  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.18/0.56  
% 0.18/0.56  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.18/0.56  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.18/0.56  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.18/0.56  number of clauses in intial UL: 69
% 0.18/0.56  number of clauses initially in problem: 111
% 0.18/0.56  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 62
% 0.18/0.56  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 82
% 0.18/0.56  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.18/0.56  absolute distinct symbol count: 39
% 0.18/0.56     distinct predicate count: 6
% 0.18/0.56     distinct function count: 26
% 0.18/0.56     distinct constant count: 7
% 0.18/0.56  
% 0.18/0.56  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.18/0.56  
% 0.18/0.56  
% 0.18/0.56  
% 0.18/0.56  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.18/0.56  
% 0.18/0.56  =========== start of search ===========
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 2.22/2.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.22/2.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Model 2 [ 2 1 1518 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Model 3 [ 2 1 5677 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Model 4 [ 3 1 3155 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Model 5 [ 4 1 13036 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   2.05 sec ----> 162 [binary,161.1,68.1] {-} $F.
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Length of proof is 2.  Level of proof is 2.
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 2.22/2.43  % SZS status Theorem
% 2.22/2.43  % SZS output start Refutation
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  1 [] {+} -subclass(A,B)| -member(C,A)|member(C,B).
% 2.22/2.43  43 [] {+} -inductive(A)|member(null_class,A).
% 2.22/2.43  68 [] {+} -member(null_class,universal_class).
% 2.22/2.43  83 [] {+} subclass(A,universal_class).
% 2.22/2.43  109 [] {+} inductive($c1).
% 2.22/2.43  144 [hyper,109,43] {+} member(null_class,$c1).
% 2.22/2.43  161 [hyper,144,1,83] {-} member(null_class,universal_class).
% 2.22/2.43  162 [binary,161.1,68.1] {-} $F.
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  % SZS output end Refutation
% 2.22/2.43  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  ============ end of search ============
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  true clauses given           0      (0.0%)
% 2.22/2.43  false clauses given          5
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43        FALSE     TRUE
% 2.22/2.43     3  1         2
% 2.22/2.43     5  2         3
% 2.22/2.43     6  2         0
% 2.22/2.43     7  4         3
% 2.22/2.43     8  7         4
% 2.22/2.43     9  1         0
% 2.22/2.43    10  2         5
% 2.22/2.43    11  1         3
% 2.22/2.43    12  0         2
% 2.22/2.43    13  3         1
% 2.22/2.43    15  0         2
% 2.22/2.43    16  1         2
% 2.22/2.43    18  0         3
% 2.22/2.43    19  0         1
% 2.22/2.43    20  0         1
% 2.22/2.43  tot:  24        32      (57.1% true)
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Model 5 [ 4 1 13036 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 2.22/2.43  
% 2.22/2.43  Process 22634 finished Sun Jul 10 23:57:29 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------