↑ Up

SuperZenon---0.0.1.THM-Prf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SuperZenon---0.0.1
% Problem  : SET065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:38:54 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 1.51s 1.69s
% Output   : Proof 1.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : SET065+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : run_super_zenon -p0 -itptp -om -max-time %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 23:57:52 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 1.51/1.69  % SZS status Theorem
% 1.51/1.69  (* PROOF-FOUND *)
% 1.51/1.69  (* BEGIN-PROOF *)
% 1.51/1.69  % SZS output start Proof
% 1.51/1.69  1. (member (null_class) T_0) (-. (member (null_class) T_0))   ### Axiom
% 1.51/1.69  2. (-. (member (null_class) (universal_class))) (member (null_class) (universal_class))   ### Axiom
% 1.51/1.69  3. ((member (null_class) T_0) => (member (null_class) (universal_class))) (-. (member (null_class) (universal_class))) (member (null_class) T_0)   ### Imply 1 2
% 1.51/1.69  4. (All U, ((member U T_0) => (member U (universal_class)))) (member (null_class) T_0) (-. (member (null_class) (universal_class)))   ### All 3
% 1.51/1.69  5. (subclass T_0 (universal_class)) (-. (member (null_class) (universal_class))) (member (null_class) T_0)   ### Definition-Pseudo(subclass) 4
% 1.51/1.69  6. (All X, (subclass X (universal_class))) (member (null_class) T_0) (-. (member (null_class) (universal_class)))   ### All 5
% 1.51/1.69  7. ((member (null_class) T_0) /\ (subclass (image (successor_relation) T_0) T_0)) (-. (member (null_class) (universal_class))) (All X, (subclass X (universal_class)))   ### And 6
% 1.51/1.69  8. (inductive T_0) (All X, (subclass X (universal_class))) (-. (member (null_class) (universal_class)))   ### Definition-Pseudo(inductive) 7
% 1.51/1.69  9. ((member T_0 (universal_class)) /\ ((inductive T_0) /\ (All Y, ((inductive Y) => (subclass T_0 Y))))) (-. (member (null_class) (universal_class))) (All X, (subclass X (universal_class)))   ### ConjTree 8
% 1.51/1.69  10. (Ex X, ((member X (universal_class)) /\ ((inductive X) /\ (All Y, ((inductive Y) => (subclass X Y)))))) (All X, (subclass X (universal_class))) (-. (member (null_class) (universal_class)))   ### Exists 9
% 1.51/1.69  % SZS output end Proof
% 1.51/1.69  (* END-PROOF *)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------