↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET065+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:21 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 2.35s 1.27s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.35s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   79 (   1 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   79 (  31   ~;  26   |;  17   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   0 sgn  34   !;   4   ?;   7   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( member(X2,X0)
         => member(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',subclass_defn) ).

fof(f2,axiom,
    ! [X0] : subclass(X0,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

fof(f29,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( inductive(X0)
    <=> ( subclass(image(successor_relation,X0),X0)
        & member(null_class,X0) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',inductive_defn) ).

fof(f30,axiom,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( inductive(X1)
         => subclass(X0,X1) )
      & inductive(X0)
      & member(X0,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',infinity) ).

fof(f44,conjecture,
    member(null_class,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',null_class_is_a_set) ).

fof(f45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f44]) ).

fof(f46,plain,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(flattening,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f48,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X0,X1)
    <=> ! [X2] :
          ( ~ member(X2,X0)
          | member(X2,X1) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

fof(f52,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ! [X1] :
          ( ~ inductive(X1)
          | subclass(X0,X1) )
      & inductive(X0)
      & member(X0,universal_class) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f30]) ).

fof(f61,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subclass(X0,X1)
        | ! [X2] :
            ( ~ member(X2,X0)
            | member(X2,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X0)
            & ~ member(X2,X1) )
        | subclass(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f48]) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subclass(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X0)
            | member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ? [X2] :
            ( member(X2,X0)
            & ~ member(X2,X1) )
        | subclass(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f61]) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( ( ~ subclass(X0,X1)
        | ! [X3] :
            ( ~ member(X3,X0)
            | member(X3,X1) ) )
      & ( ( member(sK0(X0,X1),X0)
          & ~ member(sK0(X0,X1),X1) )
        | subclass(X0,X1) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X2,sK0(X0,X1))],[f62]) ).

fof(f86,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ inductive(X0)
        | ( subclass(image(successor_relation,X0),X0)
          & member(null_class,X0) ) )
      & ( ~ subclass(image(successor_relation,X0),X0)
        | ~ member(null_class,X0)
        | inductive(X0) ) ),
    inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f29]) ).

fof(f87,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ( ~ inductive(X0)
        | ( subclass(image(successor_relation,X0),X0)
          & member(null_class,X0) ) )
      & ( ~ subclass(image(successor_relation,X0),X0)
        | ~ member(null_class,X0)
        | inductive(X0) ) ),
    inference(flattening,[],[f86]) ).

fof(f88,plain,
    ( ! [X1] :
        ( ~ inductive(X1)
        | subclass(sK1,X1) )
    & inductive(sK1)
    & member(sK1,universal_class) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1]),skolemize(X0,sK1)],[f52]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ! [X3,X0,X1] :
      ( ~ subclass(X0,X1)
      | ~ member(X3,X0)
      | member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f63]) ).

fof(f106,plain,
    ! [X0] : subclass(X0,universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).

fof(f159,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ~ inductive(X0)
      | member(null_class,X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f87]) ).

fof(f162,plain,
    inductive(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f88]) ).

fof(f190,plain,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f46]) ).

tcf(c_51,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(X2,X1)
      | ~ member(X2,X0)
      | ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).

tcf(c_52,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : subclass(X0,universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f106]) ).

tcf(c_98,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(null_class,X0)
      | ~ inductive(X0) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f159]) ).

tcf(c_101,plain,
    inductive(sK1),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f162]) ).

tcf(c_128,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f190]) ).

tcf(c_883,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(null_class,X0)
      | ( X0 != sK1 ) ),
    inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_98,c_101]) ).

tcf(c_884,plain,
    member(null_class,sK1),
    inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_883]) ).

tcf(c_1550,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_128]) ).

tcf(c_2579,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(null_class,X0)
      | ~ subclass(sK1,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_884,c_51]) ).

tcf(c_2723,plain,
    member(null_class,universal_class),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_52,c_2579]) ).

tcf(c_2725,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2723,c_1550]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET065+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/0.36  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:34:34 UTC 2026
% 0.02/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.02/0.36  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.02/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.02/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.02/0.41  
% 0.02/0.41  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.02/0.42  % Proving...
% 2.35/1.27  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.35/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.35/1.27  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.35/1.27  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ Parsing...
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % 
% 2.35/1.27  % clauses                               75
% 2.35/1.27  % conjectures                           1
% 2.35/1.27  % EPR                                   8
% 2.35/1.27  % Horn                                  67
% 2.35/1.27  % unary                                 15
% 2.35/1.27  % binary                                39
% 2.35/1.27  % lits                                  157
% 2.35/1.27  % lits eq                               14
% 2.35/1.27  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.35/1.27  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.35/1.27  % fd_cond                               4
% 2.35/1.27  % fd_pseudo_cond                        3
% 2.35/1.27  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ 
% 2.35/1.27  % Current options:
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ 
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % 
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % ------ Proving...
% 2.35/1.27  % 
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.35/1.27  
% 2.35/1.27  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------