↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET067+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:36 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 12.34s 2.03s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 12.34s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   57 (  25   ~;  22   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   47 (   4 sgn  24   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subclass_defn,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( subclass(X,Y)
    <=> ! [U] :
          ( member(U,X)
         => member(U,Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subclass_defn) ).

fof(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    ! [X] : subclass(X,universal_class),
    file('theBenchmark.p',class_elements_are_sets) ).

fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [U,X,Y] :
      ( member(U,unordered_pair(X,Y))
    <=> ( ( U = Y
          | U = X )
        & member(U,universal_class) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(pair_contains_other,conjecture,
    ! [X,Y] : subclass(unordered_pair(X,X),unordered_pair(X,Y)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',pair_contains_other) ).

fof(pair_contains_other_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y] : subclass(unordered_pair(X,X),unordered_pair(X,Y)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[pair_contains_other]) ).

fof(nnf_42,plain,
    ? [X,Y] : ~ subclass(unordered_pair(X,X),unordered_pair(X,Y)),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[pair_contains_other_neg]) ).

fof(sk_pair_contains_other_neg,plain,
    ~ subclass(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X,sK0),skolemize(Y,sK1)],[nnf_42]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_pair_contains_other_neg]) ).

cnf(c_130,plain,
    ( A != B
    | ~ member(A,universal_class)
    | member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

cnf(c_131,plain,
    ( A = C
    | A = B
    | ~ member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

cnf(c_136,plain,
    subclass(A,universal_class),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[class_elements_are_sets]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( ? [U] :
            ( ~ member(U,Y)
            & member(U,X) )
        | subclass(X,Y) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,Y)
            | ~ member(X0,X) )
        | ~ subclass(X,Y) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subclass_defn]) ).

fof(sk_subclass_defn_sk,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( ( ~ member(sK2(X,Y),Y)
          & member(sK2(X,Y),X) )
        | subclass(X,Y) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,Y)
            | ~ member(X0,X) )
        | ~ subclass(X,Y) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U,sK2(X,Y))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_subclass_defn,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ member(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subclass(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subclass(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subclass(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_subclass_defn_sk]) ).

cnf(c_137,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK2(A,B),B)
    | subclass(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(c_138,plain,
    ( member(sK2(A,B),A)
    | subclass(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(c_139,plain,
    ( member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | ~ subclass(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(c_192,plain,
    ( A = B
    | ~ member(A,unordered_pair(B,B)) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_131]) ).

cnf(c_301,plain,
    ( ~ member(A,universal_class)
    | member(A,unordered_pair(A,B)) ),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_130]) ).

cnf(c_317,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_64]) ).

cnf(c_321,plain,
    member(sK2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),unordered_pair(sK0,sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_64]) ).

cnf(c_323,plain,
    ( member(A,universal_class)
    | ~ member(A,B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_139,c_136]) ).

cnf(c_6176,plain,
    member(sK2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),universal_class),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_321,c_323]) ).

cnf(c_6179,plain,
    sK2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)) = sK0,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_321,c_192]) ).

cnf(c_6201,plain,
    member(sK0,universal_class),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_6179,c_6176]) ).

cnf(c_6211,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK0,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_6179,c_317]) ).

cnf(c_6343,plain,
    ~ member(sK0,universal_class),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_301,c_6211]) ).

cnf(c_6342,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_6201,c_6343]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET067+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.43  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.43  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.43  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.43  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/0.43  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/0.43  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.43  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:03:39 UTC 2026
% 0.18/0.43  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.43  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.18/0.43  % Process 2274851 was started by sandbox2 on n003,
% 0.18/0.43  % Sat Sep 26 07:03:39 2026
% 0.18/0.43  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.18/0.45  
% 0.18/0.45  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 12.34/2.03  
% 12.34/2.03  % given #500 (W,wt=16): 2333 -member(unordered_pair(A,null_class),power_class(null_class)).  [ur(78,b,1703,a)].
% 12.34/2.03  
% 12.34/2.03  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 12.34/2.03  
% 12.34/2.03  % Proof 1 at 1.24 (+ 0.31) seconds.
% 12.34/2.03  % Length of proof is 21.
% 12.34/2.03  % Level of proof is 5.
% 12.34/2.03  % Maximum clause weight is 26.000.
% 12.34/2.03  % Given clauses 505.
% 12.34/2.03  
% 12.34/2.03  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------