↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET072+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 8.19s 1.48s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   33 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   65 (  28 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   50 (  18   ~;  14   |;  12   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   38 (   7 sgn  14   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subclass_defn,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( subclass(X,Y)
    <=> ! [U] :
          ( member(U,X)
         => member(U,Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subclass_defn) ).

fof(extensionality,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( X = Y
    <=> ( subclass(Y,X)
        & subclass(X,Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',extensionality) ).

fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [U,X,Y] :
      ( member(U,unordered_pair(X,Y))
    <=> ( ( U = Y
          | U = X )
        & member(U,universal_class) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(right_cancellation,conjecture,
    ! [X,Y,Z] :
      ( ( unordered_pair(X,Z) = unordered_pair(Y,Z)
        & member(Y,universal_class)
        & member(X,universal_class) )
     => X = Y ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',right_cancellation) ).

fof(right_cancellation_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y,Z] :
        ( ( unordered_pair(X,Z) = unordered_pair(Y,Z)
          & member(Y,universal_class)
          & member(X,universal_class) )
       => X = Y ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[right_cancellation]) ).

fof(nnf_42,plain,
    ? [X,Y,Z] :
      ( Y != X
      & unordered_pair(Y,Z) = unordered_pair(X,Z)
      & member(Y,universal_class)
      & member(X,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[right_cancellation_neg]) ).

fof(sk_right_cancellation_neg,plain,
    ( sK0 != sK1
    & unordered_pair(sK0,sK2) = unordered_pair(sK1,sK2)
    & member(sK0,universal_class)
    & member(sK1,universal_class) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK0,sK2]),skolemize(X,sK1),skolemize(Y,sK0),skolemize(Z,sK2)],[nnf_42]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 != sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_right_cancellation_neg]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(sK0,sK2) = unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_right_cancellation_neg]) ).

cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK0,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_right_cancellation_neg]) ).

cnf(c_67,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK1,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_right_cancellation_neg]) ).

cnf(c_133,plain,
    ( A != B
    | ~ member(A,universal_class)
    | member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

cnf(c_134,plain,
    ( A = C
    | A = B
    | ~ member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

cnf(c_137,plain,
    ( subclass(A,B)
    | A != B ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[extensionality]) ).

cnf(c_142,plain,
    ( member(C,B)
    | ~ member(C,A)
    | ~ subclass(A,B) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(c_375,plain,
    ( sK1 != A
    | member(sK1,unordered_pair(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_133,c_67]) ).

cnf(c_376,plain,
    ( sK0 != A
    | member(sK0,unordered_pair(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_133,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_18949,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

cnf(c_18950,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1 = A
    | ~ member(sK1,unordered_pair(sK0,A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_134,c_18949]) ).

cnf(c_18951,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != sK0,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

cnf(c_379,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK1,unordered_pair(sK0,sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18950,c_18951]) ).

cnf(c_18952,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(sK1,sK2) = unordered_pair(sK0,sK2),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_65]) ).

cnf(c_409,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),unordered_pair(sK0,sK2)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_18952]) ).

cnf(c_18329,plain,
    member(sK1,unordered_pair(sK1,A)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_375]) ).

cnf(c_18670,plain,
    member(sK0,unordered_pair(sK0,A)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_376]) ).

cnf(c_18953,plain,
    ( member(sK1,B)
    | ~ subclass(unordered_pair(sK1,A),B) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_18329]) ).

cnf(c_18870,plain,
    ~ subclass(unordered_pair(sK1,A),unordered_pair(sK0,sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18953,c_379]) ).

cnf(c_18913,plain,
    member(sK0,unordered_pair(sK1,sK2)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_18670]) ).

cnf(c_18954,plain,
    ( sK0 = sK2
    | sK0 = sK1 ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18913,c_134]) ).

cnf(c_18955,plain,
    ( sK2 = sK0
    | sK0 = sK1 ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_18954]) ).

cnf(c_18927,negated_conjecture,
    sK2 = sK0,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_18955]) ).

cnf(c_18956,plain,
    subclass(unordered_pair(sK1,sK2),unordered_pair(sK0,sK0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_18927,c_409]) ).

cnf(c_18948,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_18870,c_18956]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET072+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:02:59 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.11/0.36  % Process 3629364 was started by sandbox2 on n009,
% 0.11/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 07:02:59 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.11/0.37  
% 0.11/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 8.19/1.48  
% 8.19/1.48  % given #500 (T,wt=14): 7541 complement(universal_class) = null_class.  [resolve(270,a,71,b),flip(b),merge(b)].
% 8.19/1.48  
% 8.19/1.48  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 8.19/1.48  
% 8.19/1.48  % Proof 1 at 0.76 (+ 0.32) seconds.
% 8.19/1.48  % Length of proof is 22.
% 8.19/1.48  % Level of proof is 6.
% 8.19/1.48  % Maximum clause weight is 21.000.
% 8.19/1.48  % Given clauses 920.
% 8.19/1.48  
% 8.19/1.48  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------