↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET072-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:37 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  23 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   19 (  12   ~;   7   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_right_cancellation_3,axiom,
    x != y,
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_right_cancellation_3) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    x != y,
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_right_cancellation_3]) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    y != x,
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_33]) ).

fof(prove_right_cancellation_2,axiom,
    member(ordered_pair(x,y),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_right_cancellation_2) ).

cnf(c_35,plain,
    member(ordered_pair(x,y),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_right_cancellation_2]) ).

fof(prove_right_cancellation_1,axiom,
    unordered_pair(x,z) = unordered_pair(y,z),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_right_cancellation_1) ).

cnf(c_36,plain,
    unordered_pair(x,z) = unordered_pair(y,z),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_right_cancellation_1]) ).

cnf(c_37,plain,
    unordered_pair(y,z) = unordered_pair(x,z),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_36]) ).

fof(left_cancellation,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
      ( VAR_1 = VAR_2
      | ~ member(ordered_pair(VAR_1,VAR_2),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))
      | unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) != unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_2) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',left_cancellation) ).

cnf(c_38,plain,
    ( B = C
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(B,C),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class))
    | unordered_pair(A,B) != unordered_pair(A,C) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[left_cancellation]) ).

fof(commutativity_of_unordered_pair,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] : unordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1) = unordered_pair(VAR_1,VAR_0),
    file('theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_unordered_pair) ).

cnf(c_44,plain,
    unordered_pair(A,B) = unordered_pair(B,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_unordered_pair]) ).

cnf(c_593,plain,
    ( x = y
    | unordered_pair(A,x) != unordered_pair(A,y) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_38,c_35]) ).

cnf(c_594,plain,
    ( x = y
    | unordered_pair(A,y) != unordered_pair(A,x) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_593]) ).

cnf(c_595,plain,
    ( y = x
    | unordered_pair(A,y) != unordered_pair(A,x) ),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_594]) ).

cnf(c_174,plain,
    unordered_pair(A,y) != unordered_pair(A,x),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_595]) ).

cnf(c_596,plain,
    unordered_pair(y,z) = unordered_pair(z,x),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_37]) ).

cnf(c_177,plain,
    unordered_pair(z,x) = unordered_pair(y,z),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_596]) ).

cnf(c_591,plain,
    unordered_pair(y,A) != unordered_pair(A,x),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_44,c_174]) ).

cnf(c_597,plain,
    unordered_pair(y,z) = unordered_pair(z,x),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_177]) ).

cnf(c_592,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_591,c_597]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET072-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.42  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/0.42  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:03:14 UTC 2026
% 0.15/0.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.43  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.15/0.43  % Process 2740724 was started by sandbox on n010,
% 0.15/0.43  % Sat Sep 26 07:03:14 2026
% 0.15/0.43  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.15/0.44  
% 0.15/0.44  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.15/0.54  
% 0.15/0.54  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.15/0.54  
% 0.15/0.54  % Proof 1 at 0.06 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 0.15/0.54  % Length of proof is 11.
% 0.15/0.54  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.15/0.54  % Maximum clause weight is 27.000.
% 0.15/0.54  % Given clauses 123.
% 0.15/0.54  
% 0.15/0.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------