↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET074+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:38 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.40s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   8 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   25 (  10 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   21 (  11   ~;   4   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   16 (   3 sgn   8   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [U,X,Y] :
      ( member(U,unordered_pair(X,Y))
    <=> ( ( U = Y
          | U = X )
        & member(U,universal_class) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(null_class_defn,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ member(X,null_class),
    file('theBenchmark.p',null_class_defn) ).

fof(corollary1_2,conjecture,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( member(Y,universal_class)
     => unordered_pair(X,Y) != null_class ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',corollary1_2) ).

fof(corollary1_2_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y] :
        ( member(Y,universal_class)
       => unordered_pair(X,Y) != null_class ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[corollary1_2]) ).

fof(nnf_42,plain,
    ? [X,Y] :
      ( unordered_pair(X,Y) = null_class
      & member(Y,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[corollary1_2_neg]) ).

fof(sk_corollary1_2_neg,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(sK0,sK1) = null_class
    & member(sK1,universal_class) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK0]),skolemize(X,sK0),skolemize(Y,sK1)],[nnf_42]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(sK0,sK1) = null_class,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_corollary1_2_neg]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    null_class = unordered_pair(sK0,sK1),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK1,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_corollary1_2_neg]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    ~ member(A,null_class),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[null_class_defn]) ).

cnf(c_116,plain,
    ~ member(A,unordered_pair(sK0,sK1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_115]) ).

cnf(c_137,plain,
    ( A != C
    | ~ member(A,universal_class)
    | member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

cnf(c_306,plain,
    ( A != sK1
    | ~ member(A,universal_class) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_116]) ).

cnf(c_307,plain,
    ~ member(sK1,universal_class),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_306]) ).

cnf(c_305,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_66,c_307]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET074+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:04:33 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.36  % Process 931452 was started by sandbox on n020,
% 0.09/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 07:04:33 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.38  
% 0.09/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % Proof 1 at 0.01 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.14/0.40  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.14/0.40  % Level of proof is 4.
% 0.14/0.40  % Maximum clause weight is 21.000.
% 0.14/0.40  % Given clauses 38.
% 0.14/0.40  
% 0.14/0.40  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------