↑ Up

SOS---2.0.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : SET078-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:15:26 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.83s 1.06s
% Output   : Refutation 0.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET078-7 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.13/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 19:02:32 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.20/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n027.cluster.edu,
% 0.20/0.36  Sat Jul  9 19:02:32 2022
% 0.20/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 28277.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.20/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.20/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=0, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=5.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  This ia a non-Horn set with equality.  The strategy will be
% 0.20/0.36  Knuth-Bendix, ordered hyper_res, ur_res, factoring, and
% 0.20/0.36  unit deletion, with positive clauses in sos and nonpositive
% 0.20/0.36  clauses in usable.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(hyper_res).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(unit_deletion).
% 0.20/0.36     dependent: set(factor).
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.20/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 90 during input processing: 0 [demod,93] {-} member(unordered_pair(A,A),universal_class).
% 0.20/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 159 during input processing: 0 [copy,159,flip.1] {-} unordered_pair(A,B)=unordered_pair(B,A).
% 0.20/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 169 during input processing: 0 [copy,169,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.20/0.36  169 back subsumes 86.
% 0.20/0.36  169 back subsumes 78.
% 0.20/0.36  
% 0.20/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.42/0.61  
% 0.42/0.61  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.42/0.61  
% 0.42/0.61  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.42/0.61  
% 0.42/0.61  
% 0.42/0.61  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.42/0.61  
% 0.42/0.61  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.42/0.61  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.42/0.61  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.42/0.61  number of clauses in intial UL: 66
% 0.42/0.61  number of clauses initially in problem: 149
% 0.42/0.61  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 44
% 0.42/0.61  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 60
% 0.42/0.61  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.42/0.61  absolute distinct symbol count: 50
% 0.42/0.61     distinct predicate count: 10
% 0.42/0.61     distinct function count: 30
% 0.42/0.61     distinct constant count: 10
% 0.42/0.61  
% 0.42/0.61  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.42/0.61  
% 0.42/0.61  
% 0.42/0.61  
% 0.42/0.61  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.42/0.61  
% 0.42/0.61  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.83/1.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.83/1.06  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.66 sec ----> 274 [binary,273.1,170.1] {-} $F.
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  Length of proof is 3.  Level of proof is 2.
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.83/1.06  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.83/1.06  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  8 [] {+} -member(A,universal_class)|member(A,unordered_pair(B,A)).
% 0.83/1.06  77 [] {-} -member(singleton(y),unordered_pair(x,singleton(y))).
% 0.83/1.06  90 [] {-} member(unordered_pair(A,B),universal_class).
% 0.83/1.06  91 [] {-} unordered_pair(A,A)=singleton(A).
% 0.83/1.06  93,92 [copy,91,flip.1] {-} singleton(A)=unordered_pair(A,A).
% 0.83/1.06  170 [back_demod,77,demod,93,93] {+} -member(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(x,unordered_pair(y,y))).
% 0.83/1.06  273 [hyper,90,8] {-} member(unordered_pair(A,B),unordered_pair(C,unordered_pair(A,B))).
% 0.83/1.06  274 [binary,273.1,170.1] {-} $F.
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.83/1.06  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  ============ end of search ============
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  true clauses given           1      (16.7%)
% 0.83/1.06  false clauses given          5
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.83/1.06     3  3         3
% 0.83/1.06     5  5         5
% 0.83/1.06     6  3         0
% 0.83/1.06     7  8         2
% 0.83/1.06     8  14        7
% 0.83/1.06     9  4         1
% 0.83/1.06    10  6         7
% 0.83/1.06    11  3         8
% 0.83/1.06    12  2         8
% 0.83/1.06    13  5         8
% 0.83/1.06    14  3         1
% 0.83/1.06    15  1         0
% 0.83/1.06    16  3         4
% 0.83/1.06    17  0         5
% 0.83/1.06    18  0         2
% 0.83/1.06    19  0         1
% 0.83/1.06    20  0         2
% 0.83/1.06    22  1         1
% 0.83/1.06    23  1         0
% 0.83/1.06    24  1         3
% 0.83/1.06  tot:  63        68      (51.9% true)
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.83/1.06  
% 0.83/1.06  Process 28277 finished Sat Jul  9 19:02:32 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------