↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET078-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.47s 1.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   17 (  14 unt;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   31 (   6 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   7   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    5 (   3 usr;   3 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   13 (   0 sgn  13   !;   0   ?;   6   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f9,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( member(X0,unordered_pair(X0,X1))
      | ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair2) ).

fof(f11,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : member(unordered_pair(X0,X1),universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pairs_in_universal) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

fof(f120,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_unordered_pair) ).

fof(f133,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(singleton(y),unordered_pair(x,singleton(y))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_1_to_singletons_are_sets_1) ).

fof(f194,plain,
    ~ member(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(x,unordered_pair(y,y))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f133,f12,f12]) ).

tcf(c_178,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
      ( member(X0,unordered_pair(X0,X1))
      | ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f9]) ).

tcf(c_180,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : member(unordered_pair(X0,X1),universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f11]) ).

tcf(c_261,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : unordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f120]) ).

tcf(c_274,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(x,unordered_pair(y,y))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f194]) ).

tcf(c_3179,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = unordered_pair(y,y),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_3180,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = unordered_pair(x,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_3181,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_274,c_3180,c_3179]) ).

tcf(c_4151,plain,
    member(iPr_def_10,universal_class),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_3179,c_180]) ).

tcf(c_4154,plain,
    unordered_pair(iPr_def_10,x) = iPr_def_11,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_3180,c_261]) ).

tcf(c_4233,plain,
    ( member(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_11)
    | ~ member(iPr_def_10,universal_class) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4154,c_178]) ).

tcf(c_4234,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_4233,c_3181,c_4151]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET078-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.38  % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.39  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.39  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:41:25 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.39  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.39  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.12/0.43  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.43  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.12/0.44  
% 0.12/0.44  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.12/0.45  % Proving...
% 3.47/1.30  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.47/1.30  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.47/1.30  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.47/1.30  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ Proving...
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % 
% 3.47/1.30  % clauses                               96
% 3.47/1.30  % conjectures                           1
% 3.47/1.30  % EPR                                   18
% 3.47/1.30  % Horn                                  82
% 3.47/1.30  % unary                                 25
% 3.47/1.30  % binary                                43
% 3.47/1.30  % lits                                  201
% 3.47/1.30  % lits eq                               38
% 3.47/1.30  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.47/1.30  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.47/1.30  % fd_cond                               5
% 3.47/1.30  % fd_pseudo_cond                        8
% 3.47/1.30  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ 
% 3.47/1.30  % Current options:
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ 
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % 
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % ------ Proving...
% 3.47/1.30  % 
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.47/1.30  
% 3.47/1.30  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------