↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET079+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:39 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    8
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  12 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   20 (  10   ~;   4   |;   3   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   18 (   6 sgn   7   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [U,X,Y] :
      ( member(U,unordered_pair(X,Y))
    <=> ( ( U = Y
          | U = X )
        & member(U,universal_class) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(singleton_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X] : singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',singleton_set_defn) ).

fof(null_class_defn,axiom,
    ! [X] : ~ member(X,null_class),
    file('theBenchmark.p',null_class_defn) ).

fof(corollary_to_set_in_its_singleton,conjecture,
    ! [X] :
      ( member(X,universal_class)
     => singleton(X) != null_class ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',corollary_to_set_in_its_singleton) ).

fof(corollary_to_set_in_its_singleton_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X] :
        ( member(X,universal_class)
       => singleton(X) != null_class ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[corollary_to_set_in_its_singleton]) ).

fof(nnf_42,plain,
    ? [X] :
      ( singleton(X) = null_class
      & member(X,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[corollary_to_set_in_its_singleton_neg]) ).

fof(sk_corollary_to_set_in_its_singleton_neg,plain,
    ( singleton(sK0) = null_class
    & member(sK0,universal_class) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0]),skolemize(X,sK0)],[nnf_42]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(sK0) = null_class,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_corollary_to_set_in_its_singleton_neg]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    null_class = singleton(sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_64]) ).

cnf(c_66,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK0,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_corollary_to_set_in_its_singleton_neg]) ).

cnf(c_115,plain,
    ~ member(A,null_class),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[null_class_defn]) ).

cnf(c_116,plain,
    ~ member(A,singleton(sK0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_115]) ).

cnf(c_135,plain,
    singleton(A) = unordered_pair(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[singleton_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_137,plain,
    ( A != C
    | ~ member(A,universal_class)
    | member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

cnf(c_201,plain,
    ~ member(A,unordered_pair(sK0,sK0)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_135,c_116]) ).

cnf(c_267,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK0 != B
    | member(sK0,unordered_pair(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_66]) ).

cnf(c_265,plain,
    member(sK0,unordered_pair(A,sK0)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_267]) ).

cnf(c_266,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_265,c_201]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET079+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.03  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:03:36 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.36  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.12/0.36  % Process 1069069 was started by sandbox2 on n004,
% 0.12/0.36  % Sat Sep 26 07:03:36 2026
% 0.12/0.36  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.12/0.37  
% 0.12/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.12/0.41  % Length of proof is 14.
% 0.12/0.41  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.12/0.41  % Maximum clause weight is 21.000.
% 0.12/0.41  % Given clauses 34.
% 0.12/0.41  
% 0.12/0.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------