↑ Up

E---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET090+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:13:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.14s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   27 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   60 (  26 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   53 (  20   ~;  20   |;   8   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   4  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   2 sgn  16   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [X3,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X3,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
    <=> ( ( X3 = X2
          | X3 = X1 )
        & member(X3,universal_class) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(member_of_singleton,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X3] :
      ( ( X1 = singleton(X3)
        & member(X3,universal_class) )
     => member_of(X1) = X3 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',member_of_singleton) ).

fof(singleton_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',singleton_set_defn) ).

fof(member_singleton_singleton,axiom,
    ! [X2] :
      ( member(X2,universal_class)
     => singleton(member_of(singleton(X2))) = singleton(X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',member_singleton_singleton) ).

fof(member_singleton_universal,axiom,
    ! [X2] :
      ( member(X2,universal_class)
     => member(member_of(singleton(X2)),universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',member_singleton_universal) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X39,X40,X41] :
      ( ( member(X39,unordered_pair(X40,X41))
        | ~ member(X39,universal_class)
        | X39 != X41 )
      & ( member(X39,unordered_pair(X40,X41))
        | ~ member(X39,universal_class)
        | X39 != X40 )
      & ( ~ member(X39,unordered_pair(X40,X41))
        | X39 = X41
        | X39 = X40 )
      & ( ~ member(X39,unordered_pair(X40,X41))
        | member(X39,universal_class) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X3] :
        ( ( X1 = singleton(X3)
          & member(X3,universal_class) )
       => member_of(X1) = X3 ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[member_of_singleton]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X16] : singleton(X16) = unordered_pair(X16,X16),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[singleton_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | X1 != X2
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X13] :
      ( singleton(member_of(singleton(X13))) = singleton(X13)
      | ~ member(X13,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[member_singleton_singleton])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ( member_of(esk1_0) != esk2_0
    & esk1_0 = singleton(esk2_0)
    & member(esk2_0,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X12] :
      ( member(member_of(singleton(X12)),universal_class)
      | ~ member(X12,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[member_singleton_universal])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3))
    | X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | singleton(member_of(singleton(X1))) = singleton(X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    esk1_0 = singleton(esk2_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk2_0,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(member_of(singleton(X1)),universal_class) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,singleton(X2))
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,singleton(X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(member_of(esk1_0)) = esk1_0,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    member(member_of(esk1_0),universal_class),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_16]),c_0_17])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,esk1_0)
    | X1 = esk2_0 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    member(member_of(esk1_0),esk1_0),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    member_of(esk1_0) != esk2_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET090+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:51:06 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.14/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % sh5l with pid 2284806 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.44  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2284814 completed with status 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000)
% 0.14/0.44  % SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.14/0.44  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMM31-MFFFFFNN
% 0.14/0.44  % Scheduled 13 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.14/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 28s (1) cores
% 0.14/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS status Theorem
% 0.14/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.14/0.44  % Parsed axioms                        : 48
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 3
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses                      : 89
% 0.14/0.44  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 89
% 0.14/0.44  % Processed clauses                    : 158
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % ...subsumed                          : 40
% 0.14/0.44  % ...remaining for further processing  : 118
% 0.14/0.44  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 5
% 0.14/0.44  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-subsumed                    : 9
% 0.14/0.44  % Backward-rewritten                   : 4
% 0.14/0.44  % Generated clauses                    : 280
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 246
% 0.14/0.44  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Paramodulations                      : 275
% 0.14/0.44  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Equation resolutions                 : 5
% 0.14/0.44  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Total rewrite steps                  : 44
% 0.14/0.44  % ...of those cached                   : 27
% 0.14/0.44  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of processed clauses  : 100
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 34
% 0.14/0.44  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.14/0.44  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.14/0.44  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 64
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 167
% 0.14/0.44  % ...number of literals in the above   : 408
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Current number of archived clauses   : 13
% 0.14/0.44  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 685
% 0.14/0.44  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 565
% 0.14/0.44  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 43
% 0.14/0.44  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 85
% 0.14/0.44  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 7
% 0.14/0.44  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 0.14/0.44  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.14/0.44  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 7877
% 0.14/0.44  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 951
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % User time                : 0.013 s
% 0.14/0.44  % System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 3948 pages
% 0.14/0.44  
% 0.14/0.44  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.14/0.44  % User time                : 0.018 s
% 0.14/0.44  % System time              : 0.003 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Total time               : 0.021 s
% 0.14/0.44  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.14/0.44  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------