↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET090+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:43 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.12s 0.47s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   29 (  15 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   51 (  30 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   41 (  19   ~;  11   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   3 sgn   9   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [U,X,Y] :
      ( member(U,unordered_pair(X,Y))
    <=> ( ( U = Y
          | U = X )
        & member(U,universal_class) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(singleton_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X] : singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',singleton_set_defn) ).

fof(member_singleton_singleton,axiom,
    ! [Y] :
      ( member(Y,universal_class)
     => singleton(member_of(singleton(Y))) = singleton(Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',member_singleton_singleton) ).

fof(member_of_singleton,conjecture,
    ! [X,U] :
      ( ( X = singleton(U)
        & member(U,universal_class) )
     => member_of(X) = U ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',member_of_singleton) ).

fof(member_of_singleton_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,U] :
        ( ( X = singleton(U)
          & member(U,universal_class) )
       => member_of(X) = U ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[member_of_singleton]) ).

fof(nnf_46,plain,
    ? [X,U] :
      ( member_of(X) != U
      & singleton(U) = X
      & member(U,universal_class) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[member_of_singleton_neg]) ).

fof(sk_member_of_singleton_neg,plain,
    ( member_of(sK0) != sK1
    & singleton(sK1) = sK0
    & member(sK1,universal_class) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK1,sK0]),skolemize(X,sK0),skolemize(U,sK1)],[nnf_46]) ).

cnf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    member_of(sK0) != sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_member_of_singleton_neg]) ).

cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(sK1) = sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_member_of_singleton_neg]) ).

cnf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
    sK0 = singleton(sK1),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_69]) ).

cnf(c_71,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK1,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_member_of_singleton_neg]) ).

cnf(c_74,plain,
    ( singleton(member_of(singleton(A))) = singleton(A)
    | ~ member(A,universal_class) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[member_singleton_singleton]) ).

cnf(c_138,plain,
    singleton(A) = unordered_pair(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[singleton_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_140,plain,
    ( A != C
    | ~ member(A,universal_class)
    | member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

cnf(c_142,plain,
    ( A = C
    | A = B
    | ~ member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

cnf(c_681,negated_conjecture,
    member_of(singleton(sK1)) != sK1,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_70,c_68]) ).

cnf(c_159,negated_conjecture,
    member_of(unordered_pair(sK1,sK1)) != sK1,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_681]) ).

cnf(c_682,plain,
    ( singleton(member_of(unordered_pair(A,A))) = singleton(A)
    | ~ member(A,universal_class) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_74]) ).

cnf(c_683,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(member_of(unordered_pair(A,A)),member_of(unordered_pair(A,A))) = singleton(A)
    | ~ member(A,universal_class) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_682]) ).

cnf(c_205,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(member_of(unordered_pair(A,A)),member_of(unordered_pair(A,A))) = unordered_pair(A,A)
    | ~ member(A,universal_class) ),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_683]) ).

cnf(c_684,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1 != B
    | member(sK1,unordered_pair(A,B)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_140,c_71]) ).

cnf(c_353,plain,
    member(sK1,unordered_pair(A,sK1)),
    inference(xxres,[status(thm)],[c_684]) ).

cnf(c_685,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != member_of(unordered_pair(sK1,sK1)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_159]) ).

cnf(c_686,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1 = A
    | ~ member(sK1,unordered_pair(member_of(unordered_pair(sK1,sK1)),A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_142,c_685]) ).

cnf(c_687,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != member_of(unordered_pair(sK1,sK1)),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_159]) ).

cnf(c_458,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK1,unordered_pair(member_of(unordered_pair(sK1,sK1)),member_of(unordered_pair(sK1,sK1)))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_686,c_687]) ).

cnf(c_679,plain,
    unordered_pair(member_of(unordered_pair(sK1,sK1)),member_of(unordered_pair(sK1,sK1))) = unordered_pair(sK1,sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_205,c_71]) ).

cnf(c_688,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK1,unordered_pair(sK1,sK1)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_679,c_458]) ).

cnf(c_680,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_353,c_688]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET090+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.35  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.35  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.35  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:02:39 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.35  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.35  % Process 3073862 was started by sandbox on n007,
% 0.09/0.35  % Sat Sep 26 07:02:39 2026
% 0.09/0.35  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.37  
% 0.09/0.37  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.12/0.47  
% 0.12/0.47  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.12/0.47  
% 0.12/0.47  % Proof 1 at 0.07 (+ 0.02) seconds.
% 0.12/0.47  % Length of proof is 18.
% 0.12/0.47  % Level of proof is 5.
% 0.12/0.47  % Maximum clause weight is 36.000.
% 0.12/0.47  % Given clauses 100.
% 0.12/0.47  
% 0.12/0.47  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------