%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem : SET091+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:09:19 EDT 2022
% Result : Theorem 7.47s 2.34s
% Output : CNFRefutation 7.47s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 14 ( 6 unt; 4 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 22 ( 17 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 8 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_54,negated_conjecture,
( unordered_pair(X1,X1) != esk5_0
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qcx3cwkm/input.p',i_0_54) ).
cnf(i_0_51,plain,
( member_of(X1) = X1
| member(member_of(X1),universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qcx3cwkm/input.p',i_0_51) ).
cnf(i_0_52,negated_conjecture,
member_of(esk5_0) != esk6_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qcx3cwkm/input.p',i_0_52) ).
cnf(i_0_53,negated_conjecture,
esk6_0 = esk5_0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qcx3cwkm/input.p',i_0_53) ).
cnf(i_0_71,plain,
( member_of(X1) = X1
| unordered_pair(member_of(X1),member_of(X1)) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-qcx3cwkm/input.p',i_0_71) ).
cnf(c_0_77,negated_conjecture,
( unordered_pair(X1,X1) != esk5_0
| ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
i_0_54 ).
cnf(c_0_78,plain,
( member_of(X1) = X1
| member(member_of(X1),universal_class) ),
i_0_51 ).
cnf(c_0_79,negated_conjecture,
member_of(esk5_0) != esk6_0,
i_0_52 ).
cnf(c_0_80,negated_conjecture,
esk6_0 = esk5_0,
i_0_53 ).
cnf(c_0_81,negated_conjecture,
( member_of(X1) = X1
| unordered_pair(member_of(X1),member_of(X1)) != esk5_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_77,c_0_78]) ).
cnf(c_0_82,plain,
( member_of(X1) = X1
| unordered_pair(member_of(X1),member_of(X1)) = X1 ),
i_0_71 ).
cnf(c_0_83,negated_conjecture,
member_of(esk5_0) != esk5_0,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_79,c_0_80]) ).
cnf(c_0_84,plain,
( member_of(X1) = X1
| X1 != esk5_0 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_81,c_0_82]) ).
cnf(c_0_85,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_83,c_0_84]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET091+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.03/0.12 % Command : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n029.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 09:47:33 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.46 # ENIGMATIC: Selected SinE mode:
% 0.19/0.46 # Parsing /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 0 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 0.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 1 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 1.p
% 0.19/0.46 # Filter: axfilter_auto 2 goes into file theBenchmark_axfilter_auto 2.p
% 7.47/2.34 # ENIGMATIC: Solved by G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S5PRR_RG_S0Y:
% 7.47/2.34 # Version: 2.1pre011
% 7.47/2.34 # Preprocessing time : 0.020 s
% 7.47/2.34
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof found!
% 7.47/2.34 # SZS status Theorem
% 7.47/2.34 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof object total steps : 14
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof object clause steps : 9
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof object formula steps : 5
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof object conjectures : 9
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof object clause conjectures : 6
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof object formula conjectures : 3
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof object initial clauses used : 5
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof object initial formulas used : 5
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof object generating inferences : 3
% 7.47/2.34 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 1
% 7.47/2.34 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.47/2.34 # Parsed axioms : 85
% 7.47/2.34 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 7.47/2.34 # Initial clauses : 85
% 7.47/2.34 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 7.47/2.34 # Initial clauses in saturation : 85
% 7.47/2.34 # Processed clauses : 105
% 7.47/2.34 # ...of these trivial : 1
% 7.47/2.34 # ...subsumed : 2
% 7.47/2.34 # ...remaining for further processing : 102
% 7.47/2.34 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 7
% 7.47/2.34 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 7.47/2.34 # Backward-subsumed : 3
% 7.47/2.34 # Backward-rewritten : 3
% 7.47/2.34 # Generated clauses : 421
% 7.47/2.34 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 388
% 7.47/2.34 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 7.47/2.34 # Paramodulations : 410
% 7.47/2.34 # Factorizations : 2
% 7.47/2.34 # Equation resolutions : 9
% 7.47/2.34 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 7.47/2.34 # Propositional unsat check successes : 0
% 7.47/2.34 # Current number of processed clauses : 92
% 7.47/2.34 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 17
% 7.47/2.34 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 7.47/2.34 # Negative unit clauses : 4
% 7.47/2.34 # Non-unit-clauses : 71
% 7.47/2.34 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 346
% 7.47/2.34 # ...number of literals in the above : 1045
% 7.47/2.34 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 7.47/2.34 # Current number of archived clauses : 6
% 7.47/2.34 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1015
% 7.47/2.34 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 912
% 7.47/2.34 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 5
% 7.47/2.34 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 162
% 7.47/2.34 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 7.47/2.34 # BW rewrite match attempts : 17
% 7.47/2.34 # BW rewrite match successes : 3
% 7.47/2.34 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 7.47/2.34 # Condensation successes : 0
% 7.47/2.34 # Termbank termtop insertions : 12566
% 7.47/2.34
% 7.47/2.34 # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.47/2.34 # User time : 0.026 s
% 7.47/2.34 # System time : 0.007 s
% 7.47/2.34 # Total time : 0.033 s
% 7.47/2.34 # ...preprocessing : 0.020 s
% 7.47/2.34 # ...main loop : 0.013 s
% 7.47/2.34 # Maximum resident set size: 7132 pages
% 7.47/2.34
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------