↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:44 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    3
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   18 (  11 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   32 (  20 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   24 (  10   ~;   4   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   15 (   0 sgn   8   !;   2   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [U,X,Y] :
      ( member(U,unordered_pair(X,Y))
    <=> ( ( U = Y
          | U = X )
        & member(U,universal_class) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(singleton_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X] : singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',singleton_set_defn) ).

fof(property_of_singletons1_1,conjecture,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( member(Y,X)
        & singleton(member_of(X)) = X )
     => member_of(X) = Y ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',property_of_singletons1_1) ).

fof(property_of_singletons1_1_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y] :
        ( ( member(Y,X)
          & singleton(member_of(X)) = X )
       => member_of(X) = Y ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[property_of_singletons1_1]) ).

fof(nnf_46,plain,
    ? [X,Y] :
      ( member_of(X) != Y
      & member(Y,X)
      & singleton(member_of(X)) = X ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[property_of_singletons1_1_neg]) ).

fof(sk_property_of_singletons1_1_neg,plain,
    ( member_of(sK0) != sK1
    & member(sK1,sK0)
    & singleton(member_of(sK0)) = sK0 ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X,sK0),skolemize(Y,sK1)],[nnf_46]) ).

cnf(c_68,negated_conjecture,
    member_of(sK0) != sK1,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_property_of_singletons1_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_69,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK1,sK0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_property_of_singletons1_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_70,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(member_of(sK0)) = sK0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_property_of_singletons1_1_neg]) ).

cnf(c_137,plain,
    singleton(A) = unordered_pair(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[singleton_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_141,plain,
    ( A = C
    | A = B
    | ~ member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

cnf(c_205,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(member_of(sK0),member_of(sK0)) = sK0,
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_137,c_70]) ).

cnf(c_326,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != member_of(sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_68]) ).

cnf(c_327,negated_conjecture,
    ( sK1 = A
    | ~ member(sK1,unordered_pair(member_of(sK0),A)) ),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_141,c_326]) ).

cnf(c_328,negated_conjecture,
    sK1 != member_of(sK0),
    inference(copy,[status(thm)],[c_68]) ).

cnf(c_329,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK1,unordered_pair(member_of(sK0),member_of(sK0))),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_327,c_328]) ).

cnf(c_330,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK1,sK0),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_205,c_329]) ).

cnf(c_325,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_69,c_330]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.37  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.37  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:07:51 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.38  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.10/0.38  % Process 4012301 was started by sandbox2 on n018,
% 0.10/0.38  % Sat Sep 26 07:07:51 2026
% 0.10/0.38  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.10/0.39  
% 0.10/0.39  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % Proof 1 at 0.02 (+ 0.01) seconds.
% 0.10/0.44  % Length of proof is 10.
% 0.10/0.44  % Level of proof is 3.
% 0.10/0.44  % Maximum clause weight is 11.000.
% 0.10/0.44  % Given clauses 43.
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------