%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SET094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:33 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.03s 1.29s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.03s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 29 ( 18 unt; 2 def)
% Number of atoms : 73 ( 38 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 8 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 51 ( 19 ~; 14 |; 15 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 2 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 5 ( 3 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 26 ( 0 sgn 22 !; 4 ?; 4 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
<=> ( ( X0 = X2
| X0 = X1 )
& member(X0,universal_class) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',unordered_pair_defn) ).
fof(f6,axiom,
! [X0] : singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',singleton_set_defn) ).
fof(f48,conjecture,
! [X0,X1] :
( ( member(X1,X0)
& singleton(member_of(X0)) = X0 )
=> member_of(X0) = X1 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',property_of_singletons1_1) ).
fof(f49,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [X0,X1] :
( ( member(X1,X0)
& singleton(member_of(X0)) = X0 )
=> member_of(X0) = X1 ),
inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f48]) ).
fof(f66,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( member(X1,X0)
& singleton(member_of(X0)) = X0
& member_of(X0) != X1 ),
inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f49]) ).
fof(f67,plain,
? [X0,X1] :
( member(X1,X0)
& singleton(member_of(X0)) = X0
& member_of(X0) != X1 ),
inference(flattening,[],[f66]) ).
fof(f73,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( ~ member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
| ( ( X0 = X2
| X0 = X1 )
& member(X0,universal_class) ) )
& ( ( X0 != X2
& X0 != X1 )
| ~ member(X0,universal_class)
| member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ) ),
inference(nnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
fof(f74,plain,
! [X0,X1,X2] :
( ( ~ member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
| ( ( X0 = X2
| X0 = X1 )
& member(X0,universal_class) ) )
& ( ( X0 != X2
& X0 != X1 )
| ~ member(X0,universal_class)
| member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ) ),
inference(flattening,[],[f73]) ).
fof(f110,plain,
( member(sK7,sK6)
& sK6 = singleton(member_of(sK6))
& sK7 != member_of(sK6) ),
inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6,sK7]),skolemize(X0,sK6),skolemize(X1,sK7)],[f67]) ).
fof(f118,plain,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( ~ member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
| X0 = X2
| X0 = X1 ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f74]) ).
fof(f123,plain,
! [X0] : singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).
fof(f202,plain,
member(sK7,sK6),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).
fof(f203,plain,
sK6 = singleton(member_of(sK6)),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).
fof(f204,plain,
sK7 != member_of(sK6),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f110]) ).
fof(f245,plain,
sK6 = unordered_pair(member_of(sK6),member_of(sK6)),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f203,f123]) ).
tcf(c_59,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( ( X0 = X2 )
| ( X0 = X1 )
| ~ member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f118]) ).
tcf(c_132,negated_conjecture,
member_of(sK6) != sK7,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f204]) ).
tcf(c_133,negated_conjecture,
unordered_pair(member_of(sK6),member_of(sK6)) = sK6,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f245]) ).
tcf(c_134,negated_conjecture,
member(sK7,sK6),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f202]) ).
tcf(c_1636,definition,
iPr_def_10 = member_of(sK6),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_1637,definition,
iPr_def_11 = unordered_pair(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_1638,negated_conjecture,
member(sK7,sK6),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_134]) ).
tcf(c_1639,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_11 = sK6,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_133,c_1636,c_1637]) ).
tcf(c_1640,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_10 != sK7,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_132]) ).
tcf(c_2500,plain,
member(sK7,iPr_def_11),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1638,c_1639]) ).
tcf(c_3765,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = iPr_def_10 )
| ~ member(X0,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1637,c_59]) ).
tcf(c_4284,plain,
sK7 = iPr_def_10,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2500,c_3765]) ).
tcf(c_4313,plain,
iPr_def_10 != iPr_def_10,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1640,c_4284]) ).
tcf(c_4315,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_4313]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SET094+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.36 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:44:47 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.11/0.36 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.11/0.40 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.40 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.11/0.41
% 0.11/0.41 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.11/0.41
% 0.11/0.42 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.11/0.43 % Proving...
% 4.03/1.29 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 4.03/1.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % ------ iProver source info
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 4.03/1.29 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 4.03/1.29 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % ------ Parsing...
% 4.03/1.29 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 4 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 4.03/1.29 % ------ Proving...
% 4.03/1.29 % ------ Problem Properties
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 %
% 4.03/1.29 % clauses 83
% 4.03/1.29 % conjectures 3
% 4.03/1.29 % EPR 10
% 4.03/1.29 % Horn 73
% 4.03/1.29 % unary 19
% 4.03/1.29 % binary 43
% 4.03/1.29 % lits 169
% 4.03/1.29 % lits eq 22
% 4.03/1.29 % fd_pure 0
% 4.03/1.29 % fd_pseudo 0
% 4.03/1.29 % fd_cond 4
% 4.03/1.29 % fd_pseudo_cond 3
% 4.03/1.29 % AC symbols 0
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % ------
% 4.03/1.29 % Current options:
% 4.03/1.29 % ------
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 %
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % ------ Proving...
% 4.03/1.29 %
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.03/1.29
% 4.03/1.29
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------