↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET095+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:07:16 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.33s 1.74s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (   7 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   52 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   48 (  16   ~;  20   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   35 (   0 sgn  20   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [X3,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X3,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,universal_class)
        & ( X3 = X1
          | X3 = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(subclass_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subclass(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',subclass_defn) ).

fof(property_of_singletons2,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( member(X1,X2)
     => subclass(singleton(X1),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',property_of_singletons2) ).

fof(singleton_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',singleton_set_defn) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X107,X108,X109] :
      ( ( member(X107,universal_class)
        | ~ member(X107,unordered_pair(X108,X109)) )
      & ( X107 = X108
        | X107 = X109
        | ~ member(X107,unordered_pair(X108,X109)) )
      & ( X107 != X108
        | ~ member(X107,universal_class)
        | member(X107,unordered_pair(X108,X109)) )
      & ( X107 != X109
        | ~ member(X107,universal_class)
        | member(X107,unordered_pair(X108,X109)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X98,X99,X100,X101,X102] :
      ( ( ~ subclass(X98,X99)
        | ~ member(X100,X98)
        | member(X100,X99) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X101,X102),X101)
        | subclass(X101,X102) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X101,X102),X102)
        | subclass(X101,X102) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subclass_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( member(X1,X2)
       => subclass(singleton(X1),X2) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[property_of_singletons2]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | X1 = X3
    | ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(esk8_0,esk9_0)
    & ~ subclass(singleton(esk8_0),esk9_0) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_6])])]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X112] : singleton(X112) = unordered_pair(X112,X112),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[singleton_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( esk1_2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X1
    | esk1_2(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) = X2
    | subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(singleton(esk8_0),esk9_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( esk1_2(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2) = X1
    | subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2) ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_11])]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(unordered_pair(esk8_0,esk8_0),esk9_0),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subclass(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    member(esk8_0,esk9_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_18])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET095+1 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:10:31 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.33/1.74  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.33/1.74  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.33/1.74  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.33/1.74  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.33/1.74  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------