↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET095+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:44 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 24.59s 14.02s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 24.59s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   23 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   53 (   8 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   49 (  19   ~;  16   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   37 (   0 sgn  24   !;   3   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subclass_defn,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( subclass(X,Y)
    <=> ! [U] :
          ( member(U,X)
         => member(U,Y) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',subclass_defn) ).

fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [U,X,Y] :
      ( member(U,unordered_pair(X,Y))
    <=> ( ( U = Y
          | U = X )
        & member(U,universal_class) ) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(singleton_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X] : singleton(X) = unordered_pair(X,X),
    file('theBenchmark.p',singleton_set_defn) ).

fof(property_of_singletons2,conjecture,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( member(X,Y)
     => subclass(singleton(X),Y) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',property_of_singletons2) ).

fof(property_of_singletons2_neg,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X,Y] :
        ( member(X,Y)
       => subclass(singleton(X),Y) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[property_of_singletons2]) ).

fof(nnf_42,plain,
    ? [X,Y] :
      ( ~ subclass(singleton(X),Y)
      & member(X,Y) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[property_of_singletons2_neg]) ).

fof(sk_property_of_singletons2_neg,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(singleton(sK0),sK1)
    & member(sK0,sK1) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1]),skolemize(X,sK0),skolemize(Y,sK1)],[nnf_42]) ).

cnf(c_64,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(singleton(sK0),sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_property_of_singletons2_neg]) ).

cnf(c_65,negated_conjecture,
    member(sK0,sK1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_property_of_singletons2_neg]) ).

cnf(c_128,plain,
    singleton(A) = unordered_pair(A,A),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[singleton_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_132,plain,
    ( A = C
    | A = B
    | ~ member(A,unordered_pair(B,C)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn]) ).

fof(nnf_1,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( ? [U] :
            ( ~ member(U,Y)
            & member(U,X) )
        | subclass(X,Y) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,Y)
            | ~ member(X0,X) )
        | ~ subclass(X,Y) ) ),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subclass_defn]) ).

fof(sk_subclass_defn_sk,plain,
    ! [X,Y] :
      ( ( ( ~ member(sK2(X,Y),Y)
          & member(sK2(X,Y),X) )
        | subclass(X,Y) )
      & ( ! [X0] :
            ( member(X0,Y)
            | ~ member(X0,X) )
        | ~ subclass(X,Y) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK2]),skolemize(U,sK2(X,Y))],[nnf_1]) ).

fof(sk_subclass_defn,plain,
    ( ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( ~ member(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_1)
        | subclass(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1] :
        ( member(sK2(VAR_0,VAR_1),VAR_0)
        | subclass(VAR_0,VAR_1) )
    & ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2] :
        ( member(VAR_2,VAR_1)
        | ~ member(VAR_2,VAR_0)
        | ~ subclass(VAR_0,VAR_1) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[sk_subclass_defn_sk]) ).

cnf(c_138,plain,
    ( ~ member(sK2(A,B),B)
    | subclass(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(c_139,plain,
    ( member(sK2(A,B),A)
    | subclass(A,B) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[sk_subclass_defn]) ).

cnf(c_193,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_128,c_64]) ).

cnf(c_194,plain,
    ( A = B
    | ~ member(A,unordered_pair(B,B)) ),
    inference(factor,[status(thm)],[c_132]) ).

cnf(c_451,plain,
    member(sK2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),sK1),unordered_pair(sK0,sK0)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_193,c_139]) ).

cnf(c_452,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),sK1),sK1),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_138,c_193]) ).

cnf(c_14892,plain,
    sK2(unordered_pair(sK0,sK0),sK1) = sK0,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_451,c_194]) ).

cnf(c_14894,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK0,sK1),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_14892,c_452]) ).

cnf(c_14893,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_65,c_14894]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET095+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.06  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/10.45  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.18/10.45  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/10.45  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/10.45  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.18/10.45  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.18/10.45  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/10.45  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/10.45  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:06:57 UTC 2026
% 0.18/10.45  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/10.45  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.18/10.45  % Process 2753265 was started by sandbox2 on n010,
% 0.18/10.45  % Sat Sep 26 07:06:57 2026
% 0.18/10.45  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.18/10.47  
% 0.18/10.47  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 24.59/14.02  
% 24.59/14.02  % given #500 (W,wt=15): 6609 complement(c4) != sum_class(universal_class).  [ur(136,b,6347,a)].
% 24.59/14.02  
% 24.59/14.02  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 24.59/14.02  
% 24.59/14.02  % Proof 1 at 2.67 (+ 0.82) seconds.
% 24.59/14.02  % Length of proof is 16.
% 24.59/14.02  % Level of proof is 5.
% 24.59/14.02  % Maximum clause weight is 24.000.
% 24.59/14.02  % Given clauses 971.
% 24.59/14.02  
% 24.59/14.02  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------