↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET099-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:13:35 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.64s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.64s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    9
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   30 (  15 unt;   2 nHn;  26 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   50 (  12 equ;  26 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_corollary_2_to_number_of_elements_in_class_2,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(not_subclass_element(x,null_class)) != x,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_2_to_number_of_elements_in_class_2) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_2_to_number_of_elements_in_class_3,negated_conjecture,
    x != null_class,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_2_to_number_of_elements_in_class_3) ).

cnf(intersection1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).

cnf(number_of_elements_in_class,axiom,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | singleton(not_subclass_element(X1,null_class)) = X1
    | member(not_subclass_element(intersection(complement(singleton(not_subclass_element(X1,null_class))),X1),null_class),intersection(complement(singleton(not_subclass_element(X1,null_class))),X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',number_of_elements_in_class) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_2_to_number_of_elements_in_class_1,negated_conjecture,
    not_subclass_element(intersection(complement(singleton(not_subclass_element(x,null_class))),x),null_class) = not_subclass_element(x,null_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_2_to_number_of_elements_in_class_1) ).

cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(set_in_its_singleton,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,singleton(X1)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',set_in_its_singleton) ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(not_subclass_element(x,null_class)) != x,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_corollary_2_to_number_of_elements_in_class_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    x != null_class,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_corollary_2_to_number_of_elements_in_class_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection1]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | singleton(not_subclass_element(X1,null_class)) = X1
    | member(not_subclass_element(intersection(complement(singleton(not_subclass_element(X1,null_class))),X1),null_class),intersection(complement(singleton(not_subclass_element(X1,null_class))),X1)) ),
    number_of_elements_in_class ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    not_subclass_element(intersection(complement(singleton(not_subclass_element(x,null_class))),x),null_class) = not_subclass_element(x,null_class),
    prove_corollary_2_to_number_of_elements_in_class_1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    singleton(not_subclass_element(x,null_class)) != x,
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    x != null_class,
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    member(not_subclass_element(x,null_class),intersection(complement(singleton(not_subclass_element(x,null_class))),x)),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    member(not_subclass_element(x,null_class),complement(singleton(not_subclass_element(x,null_class)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,singleton(X1)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[set_in_its_singleton]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(not_subclass_element(x,null_class),singleton(not_subclass_element(x,null_class))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,singleton(X1)) ),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    member(not_subclass_element(x,null_class),universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET099-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.36  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.11/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.11/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:52:40 UTC 2026
% 0.11/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.11/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.11/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.11/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.64/0.50  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.64/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.64/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % new_bool_1 with pid 1010295 completed with status 0
% 0.64/0.50  % Result found by new_bool_1
% 0.64/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.64/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.64/0.50  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.64/0.50  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.64/0.50  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1010299 completed with status 0
% 0.64/0.50  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.64/0.50  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.64/0.50  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 0.64/0.50  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.64/0.50  % Search class: FGHSM-FFMS21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.64/0.50  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.64/0.50  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 0.64/0.50  % Preprocessing time       : 0.002 s
% 0.64/0.50  
% 0.64/0.50  % Proof found!
% 0.64/0.50  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.64/0.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.64/0.50  % Parsed axioms                        : 144
% 0.64/0.50  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 79
% 0.64/0.50  % Initial clauses                      : 65
% 0.64/0.50  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.64/0.50  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 65
% 0.64/0.50  % Processed clauses                    : 978
% 0.64/0.50  % ...of these trivial                  : 42
% 0.64/0.50  % ...subsumed                          : 642
% 0.64/0.50  % ...remaining for further processing  : 294
% 0.64/0.50  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 6
% 0.64/0.50  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.64/0.50  % Backward-subsumed                    : 12
% 0.64/0.50  % Backward-rewritten                   : 11
% 0.64/0.50  % Generated clauses                    : 4864
% 0.64/0.50  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 3457
% 0.64/0.50  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.64/0.50  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 3
% 0.64/0.50  % Paramodulations                      : 4845
% 0.64/0.50  % Factorizations                       : 12
% 0.64/0.50  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.64/0.50  % Equation resolutions                 : 7
% 0.64/0.50  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.64/0.50  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1983
% 0.64/0.50  % ...of those cached                   : 1717
% 0.64/0.50  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.64/0.50  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.64/0.50  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.64/0.50  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.64/0.50  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.64/0.50  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.64/0.50  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.64/0.50  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.64/0.50  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.64/0.50  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.64/0.50  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.64/0.50  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.64/0.50  % Current number of processed clauses  : 269
% 0.64/0.50  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 67
% 0.64/0.50  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.64/0.50  %    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.64/0.50  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 194
% 0.64/0.50  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2510
% 0.64/0.50  % ...number of literals in the above   : 7130
% 0.64/0.50  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.64/0.50  % Current number of archived clauses   : 23
% 0.64/0.50  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 5533
% 0.64/0.50  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4590
% 0.64/0.50  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 553
% 0.64/0.50  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1407
% 0.64/0.50  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.64/0.50  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 63
% 0.64/0.50  % BW rewrite match successes           : 17
% 0.64/0.50  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.64/0.50  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.64/0.50  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 49745
% 0.64/0.50  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 474
% 0.64/0.50  
% 0.64/0.50  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.50  % User time                : 0.066 s
% 0.64/0.50  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.64/0.50  % Total time               : 0.071 s
% 0.64/0.50  % Maximum resident set size: 3748 pages
% 0.64/0.50  
% 0.64/0.50  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.64/0.50  % User time                : 0.069 s
% 0.64/0.50  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.64/0.50  % Total time               : 0.079 s
% 0.64/0.50  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.64/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------