↑ Up

SNARK---20120808r022.UNS-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : SET101-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:07:22 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.15s 2.34s
% Output   : Refutation 2.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :    9 (   8 unt;   0 nHn;   2 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   10 (   2 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    6 (   6 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(unordered_pair2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X,universal_class)
    | member(X,unordered_pair(X,Y)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair2) ).

cnf(unordered_pairs_in_universal,axiom,
    member(unordered_pair(X,Y),universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pairs_in_universal) ).

cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X,X) = singleton(X),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

cnf(ordered_pair,axiom,
    unordered_pair(singleton(X),unordered_pair(X,singleton(Y))) = ordered_pair(X,Y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',ordered_pair) ).

cnf(prove_singleton_member_of_ordered_pair_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(singleton(x),ordered_pair(x,y)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_singleton_member_of_ordered_pair_1) ).

cnf(107,plain,
    member(singleton(X),universal_class),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[unordered_pairs_in_universal,singleton_set,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(275,plain,
    member(singleton(X),unordered_pair(singleton(X),Y)),
    inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[unordered_pair2,107]) ).

cnf(10557,plain,
    member(singleton(X),ordered_pair(X,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[275,ordered_pair,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(10558,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_singleton_member_of_ordered_pair_1,10557]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.11  % Problem  : SET101-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Sat Jul  9 18:43:28 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.44  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.45  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.19/0.45  * 
% 0.19/0.46  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.19/0.46   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.19/0.46   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.19/0.46   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.19/0.46   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.19/0.46   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  "."
% 0.19/0.46  * 
% 0.19/0.46  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T18:43:29
% 0.19/0.46  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n024.cluster.edu at 2022-07-09T18:43:29
% 2.15/2.34  
% 2.15/2.34  
% 2.15/2.34  #||
% 2.15/2.34  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.15/2.34  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 2.15/2.35  ||#
% 2.15/2.35  
% 2.15/2.35  ; Summary of computation:
% 2.15/2.35  ;     20994 formulas have been input or derived (from 338 formulas).
% 2.15/2.35  ;     10558 (50%) were retained.  Of these,
% 2.15/2.35  ;          349 ( 3%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 2.15/2.35  ;        10209 (97%) are still being kept.
% 2.15/2.35  ; 
% 2.15/2.35  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.017   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.002   0%   Assert                       (92 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.750  40%   Process new row              (19,881 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.559  30%   Resolution                   (674 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.007   0%   Paramodulation               (337 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.000   0%   Factoring                    (7 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.026   1%   Condensing                   (1,314 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.058   3%   Forward subsumption          (1,314 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.052   3%   Backward subsumption         (1,283 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.003   0%   Clause clause subsumption    (3,226 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.220  12%   Forward simplification       (19,875 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.102   5%   Backward simplification      (10,546 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.007   0%   Ordering                     (3,468 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.000   0%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.000   0%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 2.15/2.35  ;     0.085   5%   Other
% 2.15/2.35  ;     1.888        Total
% 2.15/2.35  ;     1.889        Real time
% 2.15/2.35  ; 
% 2.15/2.35  ; Term-hash-array has 15,043 terms in all.
% 2.15/2.35  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1,260 entries (1,260 at peak, 1,283 added, 23 deleted).
% 2.15/2.35  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 5,821 nodes (5,821 at peak, 5,932 added, 111 deleted).
% 2.15/2.35  ;  Retrieved 3,082 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,314 calls.
% 2.15/2.35  ;  Retrieved 1,063 possibly backward subsumed rows in 1,283 calls.
% 2.15/2.35  ; Path-index has 14,640 entries (14,641 at peak, 15,091 added, 451 deleted).
% 2.15/2.35  ; Path-index has 6,350 nodes (6,350 at peak, 6,452 added, 102 deleted).
% 2.15/2.35  ; Trie-index has 14,640 entries (14,641 at peak, 15,091 added, 451 deleted).
% 2.15/2.35  ; Trie-index has 41,187 nodes (41,190 at peak, 42,222 added, 1,035 deleted).
% 2.15/2.35  ; Retrieved 13,239 generalization terms in 49,884 calls.
% 2.15/2.35  ; Retrieved 9,402 instance terms in 9,262 calls.
% 2.15/2.35  ; Retrieved 1,324,846 unifiable terms in 14,542 calls.
% 2.15/2.35  ; 
% 2.15/2.35  ; The agenda of rows to process has 387 entries:
% 2.15/2.35  ;     3 with value 12              7 with value 16             132 with value 21
% 2.15/2.35  ;     1 with value 13             20 with value 18              84 with value 22
% 2.15/2.35  ;     1 with value 14             32 with value 19              26 with value 23
% 2.15/2.35  ;     4 with value 15             72 with value 20               5 with value 24
% 2.15/2.35  ; The agenda of rows to give has 9891 entries:
% 2.15/2.35  ;     1 with value (4 11)        221 with value (4 23)           2 with value (4 34)
% 2.15/2.35  ;   141 with value (4 12)         42 with value (4 24)           2 with value (4 37)
% 2.15/2.35  ;   199 with value (4 13)          8 with value (4 25)           1 with value (4 43)
% 2.15/2.35  ;   381 with value (4 14)          8 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 44)
% 2.15/2.35  ;   370 with value (4 15)         13 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 45)
% 2.15/2.35  ;   578 with value (4 16)          8 with value (4 28)           3 with value (4 46)
% 2.15/2.35  ;   980 with value (4 17)         16 with value (4 29)           1 with value (4 49)
% 2.15/2.35  ;  1354 with value (4 18)         10 with value (4 30)           1 with value (4 51)
% 2.15/2.35  ;  1779 with value (4 19)          3 with value (4 31)           1 with value (4 53)
% 2.15/2.35  ;  1812 with value (4 20)          1 with value (4 32)           1 with value (4 59)
% 2.15/2.35  ;  1296 with value (4 21)          2 with value (4 33)           1 with value (4 63)
% 2.15/2.35  ;   653 with value (4 22)
% 2.15/2.35  Evaluation took:
% 2.15/2.35    1.89 seconds of real time
% 2.15/2.35    1.7452 seconds of user run time
% 2.15/2.35    0.144894 seconds of system run time
% 2.15/2.35    [Run times include 0.255 seconds GC run time.]
% 2.15/2.35    0 calls to %EVAL
% 2.15/2.35    0 page faults and
% 2.15/2.35    127,907,208 bytes consed.
% 2.15/2.35  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.15/2.35  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-09T18:43:30
% 2.15/2.35  :PROOF-FOUND
% 2.15/2.35  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------