↑ Up

ET---2.0.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : ET---2.0
% Problem  : SET103+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_ET %s %d

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 00:49:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 0.21s 1.39s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   25 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   57 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   46 (  14   ~;  21   |;   9   &)
%                                         (   1 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   3 sgn  21   !;   1   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(unordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [X3,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X3,unordered_pair(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,universal_class)
        & ( X3 = X1
          | X3 = X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',unordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(regularity,axiom,
    ! [X1] :
      ( X1 != null_class
     => ? [X3] :
          ( member(X3,universal_class)
          & member(X3,X1)
          & disjoint(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',regularity) ).

fof(property_1_of_ordered_pair,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,null_class)) = ordered_pair(X1,X2)
      | member(X2,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p.mepo_128.in',property_1_of_ordered_pair) ).

fof(ordered_pair_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,singleton(X2))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',ordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(singleton_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',singleton_set_defn) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X4,X5,X6,X4,X5,X6] :
      ( ( member(X4,universal_class)
        | ~ member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
      & ( X4 = X5
        | X4 = X6
        | ~ member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
      & ( X4 != X5
        | ~ member(X4,universal_class)
        | member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) )
      & ( X4 != X6
        | ~ member(X4,universal_class)
        | member(X4,unordered_pair(X5,X6)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair_defn])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X4] :
      ( ( member(esk6_1(X4),universal_class)
        | X4 = null_class )
      & ( member(esk6_1(X4),X4)
        | X4 = null_class )
      & ( disjoint(esk6_1(X4),X4)
        | X4 = null_class ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[regularity])])])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( X1 = X3
    | X1 = X2
    | ~ member(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | member(esk6_1(X1),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

fof(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] :
        ( unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,null_class)) = ordered_pair(X1,X2)
        | member(X2,universal_class) ),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[property_1_of_ordered_pair]) ).

fof(c_0_10,plain,
    ! [X3,X4] : ordered_pair(X3,X4) = unordered_pair(singleton(X3),unordered_pair(X3,singleton(X4))),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[ordered_pair_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_11,plain,
    ! [X2] : singleton(X2) = unordered_pair(X2,X2),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[singleton_set_defn]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( esk6_1(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X2
    | esk6_1(unordered_pair(X1,X2)) = X1
    | unordered_pair(X1,X2) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ( unordered_pair(singleton(esk8_0),unordered_pair(esk8_0,null_class)) != ordered_pair(esk8_0,esk9_0)
    & ~ member(esk9_0,universal_class) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(singleton(X1),unordered_pair(X1,singleton(X2))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    singleton(X1) = unordered_pair(X1,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | member(esk6_1(X1),universal_class) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( esk6_1(unordered_pair(X1,X1)) = X1
    | unordered_pair(X1,X1) = null_class ),
    inference(er,[status(thm)],[inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_12])]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(singleton(esk8_0),unordered_pair(esk8_0,null_class)) != ordered_pair(esk8_0,esk9_0),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ordered_pair(X1,X2) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X1,X1),unordered_pair(X1,unordered_pair(X2,X2))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(esk9_0,universal_class),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( unordered_pair(X1,X1) = null_class
    | member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk8_0,esk8_0),unordered_pair(esk8_0,null_class)) != unordered_pair(unordered_pair(esk8_0,esk8_0),unordered_pair(esk8_0,unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_15]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(esk9_0,esk9_0) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.11  % Problem  : SET103+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.10/0.12  % Command  : run_ET %s %d
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 16:59:28 EDT 2022
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.21/1.39  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_4a02c828a8cc55752123edbcc1ad40e453c11447 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.39  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.4,,04,100,1.0)
% 0.21/1.39  # Preprocessing time       : 0.015 s
% 0.21/1.39  
% 0.21/1.39  # Failure: Out of unprocessed clauses!
% 0.21/1.39  # OLD status GaveUp
% 0.21/1.39  # Parsed axioms                        : 44
% 0.21/1.39  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 37
% 0.21/1.39  # Initial clauses                      : 13
% 0.21/1.39  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 2
% 0.21/1.39  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 11
% 0.21/1.39  # Processed clauses                    : 13
% 0.21/1.39  # ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # ...remaining for further processing  : 13
% 0.21/1.39  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2
% 0.21/1.39  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Generated clauses                    : 6
% 0.21/1.39  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 2
% 0.21/1.39  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Paramodulations                      : 4
% 0.21/1.39  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Equation resolutions                 : 2
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of processed clauses  : 11
% 0.21/1.39  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 1
% 0.21/1.39  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.39  #    Negative unit clauses             : 3
% 0.21/1.39  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 7
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.39  # ...number of literals in the above   : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 0.21/1.39  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 4
% 0.21/1.39  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 4
% 0.21/1.39  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # BW rewrite match successes           : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1162
% 0.21/1.39  
% 0.21/1.39  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.39  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.21/1.39  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.21/1.39  # Total time               : 0.016 s
% 0.21/1.39  # Maximum resident set size: 2768 pages
% 0.21/1.39  # Running protocol protocol_eprover_f171197f65f27d1ba69648a20c844832c84a5dd7 for 23 seconds:
% 0.21/1.39  # Preprocessing time       : 0.020 s
% 0.21/1.39  
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof found!
% 0.21/1.39  # SZS status Theorem
% 0.21/1.39  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object total steps             : 25
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object clause steps            : 14
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object formula steps           : 11
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object conjectures             : 8
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object clause conjectures      : 5
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object formula conjectures     : 3
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object initial clauses used    : 7
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object initial formulas used   : 5
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object generating inferences   : 4
% 0.21/1.39  # Proof object simplifying inferences  : 7
% 0.21/1.39  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 0.21/1.39  # Parsed axioms                        : 44
% 0.21/1.39  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Initial clauses                      : 91
% 0.21/1.39  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 8
% 0.21/1.39  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 83
% 0.21/1.39  # Processed clauses                    : 842
% 0.21/1.39  # ...of these trivial                  : 3
% 0.21/1.39  # ...subsumed                          : 446
% 0.21/1.39  # ...remaining for further processing  : 393
% 0.21/1.39  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 15
% 0.21/1.39  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Backward-subsumed                    : 11
% 0.21/1.39  # Backward-rewritten                   : 37
% 0.21/1.39  # Generated clauses                    : 4257
% 0.21/1.39  # ...of the previous two non-trivial   : 3677
% 0.21/1.39  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 134
% 0.21/1.39  # Paramodulations                      : 4222
% 0.21/1.39  # Factorizations                       : 18
% 0.21/1.39  # Equation resolutions                 : 17
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of processed clauses  : 341
% 0.21/1.39  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 39
% 0.21/1.39  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/1.39  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.21/1.39  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 300
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 2608
% 0.21/1.39  # ...number of literals in the above   : 8355
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Current number of archived clauses   : 56
% 0.21/1.39  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 23936
% 0.21/1.39  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13326
% 0.21/1.39  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 278
% 0.21/1.39  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1017
% 0.21/1.39  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 39
% 0.21/1.39  # BW rewrite match successes           : 10
% 0.21/1.39  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/1.39  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 73678
% 0.21/1.39  
% 0.21/1.39  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/1.39  # User time                : 0.117 s
% 0.21/1.39  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.21/1.39  # Total time               : 0.123 s
% 0.21/1.39  # Maximum resident set size: 7068 pages
% 0.21/23.39  eprover: CPU time limit exceeded, terminating
% 0.21/23.40  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.40  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.41  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.41  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.42  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.42  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.43  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.43  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.44  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.44  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.45  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.45  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
% 0.21/23.46  eprover: Cannot stat file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/../tmp/theBenchmark.p
% 0.21/23.46  eprover: No such file or directory
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------