↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET103-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:37 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 8.48s 1.90s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 8.48s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   15
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   40 (  25 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   95 (  33 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   40 (  19   ~;  21   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :   10 (   8 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   31 (   0 sgn  31   !;   0   ?;  14   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( member(X2,X1)
      | ~ member(X2,X0)
      | ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0] : subclass(X0,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] :
      ( subclass(X1,X0)
      | X0 != X1 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',equal_implies_subclass2) ).

fof(f8,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( X0 = X2
      | X0 = X1
      | ~ member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair_member) ).

fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,singleton(X1))) = ordered_pair(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',ordered_pair) ).

fof(f67,axiom,
    ! [X0] :
      ( member(regular(X0),X0)
      | X0 = null_class ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity1) ).

fof(f68,plain,
    ! [X0] :
      ( member(regular(X0),X0)
      | null_class = X0 ),
    inference(reorient_equations,[],[f67]) ).

fof(f101,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(singleton(x),unordered_pair(x,null_class)) != ordered_pair(x,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_property_1_of_ordered_pair_1) ).

fof(f102,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(y,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_property_1_of_ordered_pair_2) ).

fof(f107,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X1))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f13,f12,f12]) ).

fof(f151,plain,
    unordered_pair(unordered_pair(x,x),unordered_pair(x,null_class)) != unordered_pair(unordered_pair(x,x),unordered_pair(x,unordered_pair(y,y))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f101,f12,f107]) ).

fof(f153,plain,
    ! [X1] : subclass(X1,X1),
    inference(equality_resolution,[],[f6]) ).

tcf(c_142,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( member(X0,X2)
      | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
      | ~ member(X0,X1) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).

tcf(c_145,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : subclass(X0,universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

tcf(c_147,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] : subclass(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f153]) ).

tcf(c_149,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = X2 )
      | ( X0 = X1 )
      | ~ member(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f8]) ).

tcf(c_194,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(regular(X0),X0)
      | ( X0 = null_class ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f68]) ).

tcf(c_217,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(unordered_pair(x,x),unordered_pair(x,unordered_pair(y,y))) != unordered_pair(unordered_pair(x,x),unordered_pair(x,null_class)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f151]) ).

tcf(c_218,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(y,universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f102]) ).

tcf(c_2644,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = unordered_pair(x,x),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_2645,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = unordered_pair(y,y),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_2646,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = unordered_pair(x,iPr_def_11),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_2647,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = unordered_pair(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_2648,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = unordered_pair(x,null_class),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_2649,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = unordered_pair(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_2651,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_13 != iPr_def_15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_217,c_2648,c_2649,c_2645,c_2646,c_2644,c_2647]) ).

tcf(c_4172,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( X0 = y )
      | ~ member(X0,iPr_def_11) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2645,c_149]) ).

tcf(c_4338,plain,
    ( ( null_class = iPr_def_11 )
    | ( regular(iPr_def_11) = y ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_194,c_4172]) ).

tcf(c_4650,plain,
    ( member(y,iPr_def_11)
    | ( null_class = iPr_def_11 ) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4338,c_194]) ).

tcf(c_4660,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(y,X0)
      | ( null_class = iPr_def_11 )
      | ~ subclass(iPr_def_11,X0) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4650,c_142]) ).

tcf(c_7623,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( member(y,universal_class)
      | ~ subclass(X0,universal_class)
      | ~ member(y,X0) ),
    inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_142]) ).

tcf(c_8115,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ~ subclass(iPr_def_11,X0)
      | ( null_class = iPr_def_11 ) ),
    inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_4660,c_145,c_218,c_4660,c_7623]) ).

tcf(c_8116,plain,
    ! [X0: $i] :
      ( ( null_class = iPr_def_11 )
      | ~ subclass(iPr_def_11,X0) ),
    inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_8115]) ).

tcf(c_8124,plain,
    null_class = iPr_def_11,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_147,c_8116]) ).

tcf(c_8199,plain,
    unordered_pair(x,iPr_def_11) = iPr_def_14,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2648,c_8124]) ).

tcf(c_8201,plain,
    iPr_def_12 = iPr_def_14,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8199,c_2646]) ).

tcf(c_8211,plain,
    unordered_pair(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_12) = iPr_def_15,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2649,c_8201]) ).

tcf(c_8213,plain,
    iPr_def_13 = iPr_def_15,
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_8211,c_2647]) ).

tcf(c_8214,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_8213,c_2651]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET103-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.52  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.52  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.52  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.52  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.52  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.52  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.52  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.52  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:47:39 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.52  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.52  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.56  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/0.56  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.57  
% 0.14/0.57  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/0.57  
% 0.14/0.57  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/0.58  % Proving...
% 8.48/1.90  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 8.48/1.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % ------  iProver source info
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 8.48/1.90  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 8.48/1.90  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 2 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ Proving...
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % 
% 8.48/1.90  % clauses                               75
% 8.48/1.90  % conjectures                           2
% 8.48/1.90  % EPR                                   14
% 8.48/1.90  % Horn                                  67
% 8.48/1.90  % unary                                 23
% 8.48/1.90  % binary                                32
% 8.48/1.90  % lits                                  153
% 8.48/1.90  % lits eq                               27
% 8.48/1.90  % fd_pure                               0
% 8.48/1.90  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 8.48/1.90  % fd_cond                               3
% 8.48/1.90  % fd_pseudo_cond                        3
% 8.48/1.90  % AC symbols                            0
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ 
% 8.48/1.90  % Current options:
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ 
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % 
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % ------ Proving...
% 8.48/1.90  % 
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 8.48/1.90  
% 8.48/1.90  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------