↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET108-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:38 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.51s 6.29s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.51s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    6
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (  12 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   18 (   7 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   10 (   7   ~;   3   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    6 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    8 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   14 (   0 sgn  14   !;   0   ?;   3   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f12,axiom,
    ! [X0] : unordered_pair(X0,X0) = singleton(X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

fof(f13,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,singleton(X1))) = ordered_pair(X0,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',ordered_pair) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( ordered_pair(first(X0),second(X0)) = X0
      | ~ member(X0,cross_product(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',cartesian_product4) ).

fof(f174,negated_conjecture,
    member(ordered_pair(y,z),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_existence_of_1st_and_2nd_1_1) ).

fof(f175,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(ordered_pair(first(ordered_pair(y,z)),second(ordered_pair(y,z))),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_existence_of_1st_and_2nd_1_2) ).

fof(f176,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X1))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f13,f12,f12]) ).

fof(f177,plain,
    member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z))),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f174,f176]) ).

fof(f178,plain,
    ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z)))),first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z))))),unordered_pair(first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z)))),unordered_pair(second(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z)))),second(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z))))))),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f175,f176,f176,f176]) ).

fof(f201,plain,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] :
      ( unordered_pair(unordered_pair(first(X0),first(X0)),unordered_pair(first(X0),unordered_pair(second(X0),second(X0)))) = X0
      | ~ member(X0,cross_product(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f17,f176]) ).

tcf(c_203,negated_conjecture,
    member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z))),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f177]) ).

tcf(c_204,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z)))),first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z))))),unordered_pair(first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z)))),unordered_pair(second(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z)))),second(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z))))))),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f178]) ).

tcf(c_227,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
      ( ( unordered_pair(unordered_pair(first(X0),first(X0)),unordered_pair(first(X0),unordered_pair(second(X0),second(X0)))) = X0 )
      | ~ member(X0,cross_product(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f201]) ).

tcf(c_2946,plain,
    unordered_pair(unordered_pair(first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z)))),first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z))))),unordered_pair(first(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z)))),unordered_pair(second(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z)))),second(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z))))))) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z))),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_203,c_227]) ).

tcf(c_2951,plain,
    ~ member(unordered_pair(unordered_pair(y,y),unordered_pair(y,unordered_pair(z,z))),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_204,c_2946]) ).

tcf(c_2952,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2951,c_203]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET108-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.08/5.38  % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.08/5.38  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/5.38  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/5.38  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.08/5.38  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.08/5.38  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/5.38  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.08/5.38  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:56:19 UTC 2026
% 0.08/5.38  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.08/5.38  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.14/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.14/5.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.14/5.43  
% 0.14/5.43  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.14/5.44  % Proving...
% 2.51/6.29  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 2.51/6.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % ------  iProver source info
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 2.51/6.29  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 2.51/6.29  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ Proving...
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % 
% 2.51/6.29  % clauses                               51
% 2.51/6.29  % conjectures                           2
% 2.51/6.29  % EPR                                   9
% 2.51/6.29  % Horn                                  41
% 2.51/6.29  % unary                                 15
% 2.51/6.29  % binary                                19
% 2.51/6.29  % lits                                  105
% 2.51/6.29  % lits eq                               34
% 2.51/6.29  % fd_pure                               0
% 2.51/6.29  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 2.51/6.29  % fd_cond                               1
% 2.51/6.29  % fd_pseudo_cond                        11
% 2.51/6.29  % AC symbols                            0
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ 
% 2.51/6.29  % Current options:
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ 
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % 
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % ------ Proving...
% 2.51/6.29  % 
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 2.51/6.29  
% 2.51/6.29  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------