↑ Up

iProver---3.9.4.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem  : SET117+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 3.97s 1.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.97s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   28 (  24 unt;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   49 (  19 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   11 (   7   ~;   0   |;   2   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   2  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    0 (   0   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    9 (   7 usr;   7 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   17 (   0 sgn  16   !;   1   ?;   2   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f5,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : member(unordered_pair(X0,X1),universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',unordered_pair) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X0] : singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',singleton_set_defn) ).

fof(f7,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,singleton(X1))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET005+0.ax',ordered_pair_defn) ).

fof(f44,conjecture,
    ! [X0] :
      ( ordered_pair(first(X0),second(X0)) = X0
     => member(X0,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',corollary_1_to_ordered_pairs_are_sets) ).

fof(f45,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
        ( ordered_pair(first(X0),second(X0)) = X0
       => member(X0,universal_class) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f44]) ).

fof(f60,plain,
    ? [X0] :
      ( ordered_pair(first(X0),second(X0)) = X0
      & ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f45]) ).

fof(f103,plain,
    ( sK6 = ordered_pair(first(sK6),second(sK6))
    & ~ member(sK6,universal_class) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK6]),skolemize(X0,sK6)],[f60]) ).

fof(f115,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : member(unordered_pair(X0,X1),universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f5]) ).

fof(f116,plain,
    ! [X0] : singleton(X0) = unordered_pair(X0,X0),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f6]) ).

fof(f117,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(singleton(X0),unordered_pair(X0,singleton(X1))),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

fof(f191,plain,
    sK6 = ordered_pair(first(sK6),second(sK6)),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).

fof(f192,plain,
    ~ member(sK6,universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f103]) ).

fof(f193,plain,
    ! [X0,X1] : ordered_pair(X0,X1) = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(X0,X0),unordered_pair(X0,unordered_pair(X1,X1))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f117,f116,f116]) ).

fof(f230,plain,
    sK6 = unordered_pair(unordered_pair(first(sK6),first(sK6)),unordered_pair(first(sK6),unordered_pair(second(sK6),second(sK6)))),
    inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f191,f193]) ).

tcf(c_60,plain,
    ! [X0: $i,X1: $i] : member(unordered_pair(X0,X1),universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f115]) ).

tcf(c_128,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK6,universal_class),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f192]) ).

tcf(c_129,negated_conjecture,
    unordered_pair(unordered_pair(first(sK6),first(sK6)),unordered_pair(first(sK6),unordered_pair(second(sK6),second(sK6)))) = sK6,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f230]) ).

tcf(c_1557,definition,
    iPr_def_10 = first(sK6),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1558,definition,
    iPr_def_11 = unordered_pair(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_10),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1559,definition,
    iPr_def_12 = second(sK6),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1560,definition,
    iPr_def_13 = unordered_pair(iPr_def_12,iPr_def_12),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1561,definition,
    iPr_def_14 = unordered_pair(iPr_def_10,iPr_def_13),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1562,definition,
    iPr_def_15 = unordered_pair(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_14),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_15])],[]) ).

tcf(c_1563,negated_conjecture,
    iPr_def_15 = sK6,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_129,c_1559,c_1560,c_1561,c_1557,c_1558,c_1562]) ).

tcf(c_1564,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(sK6,universal_class),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_128]) ).

tcf(c_2394,plain,
    ~ member(iPr_def_15,universal_class),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_1564,c_1563]) ).

tcf(c_2400,plain,
    member(iPr_def_15,universal_class),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_1562,c_60]) ).

tcf(c_2401,plain,
    $false,
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_2400,c_2394]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.04  % Problem  : SET117+1 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v5.4.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.17/0.42  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.17/0.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.17/0.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.42  % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 09:54:27 UTC 2026
% 0.17/0.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.42  Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.17/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.17/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.17/0.50  
% 0.17/0.50  % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.17/0.50  
% 0.17/0.50  % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.26/0.52  % Proving...
% 3.97/1.50  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.97/1.50  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % ------  iProver source info
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.97/1.50  % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.97/1.50  % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ Parsing...
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel  & Parsing by iProver...% 
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e  sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 4 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e % 
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e % 
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 1 0s  sf_e  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ Proving...
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % 
% 3.97/1.50  % clauses                               82
% 3.97/1.50  % conjectures                           2
% 3.97/1.50  % EPR                                   9
% 3.97/1.50  % Horn                                  74
% 3.97/1.50  % unary                                 22
% 3.97/1.50  % binary                                39
% 3.97/1.50  % lits                                  164
% 3.97/1.50  % lits eq                               21
% 3.97/1.50  % fd_pure                               0
% 3.97/1.50  % fd_pseudo                             0
% 3.97/1.50  % fd_cond                               4
% 3.97/1.50  % fd_pseudo_cond                        3
% 3.97/1.50  % AC symbols                            0
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on 
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ 
% 3.97/1.50  % Current options:
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ 
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % 
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % ------ Proving...
% 3.97/1.50  % 
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.97/1.50  
% 3.97/1.50  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------