↑ Up

Prover9---2026-6A.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Prover9---2026-6A
% Problem  : SET121-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p

% Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun Sep 27 08:35:51 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.89s 1.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 6.89s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   15 (   9 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   21 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   12 (   6   ~;   6   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   12 (   2 sgn   6   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(prove_corollary_1_to_OP_determines_components2_2,axiom,
    first(ordered_pair(x,y)) != ordered_pair(x,y),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_1_to_OP_determines_components2_2) ).

cnf(c_33,plain,
    first(ordered_pair(x,y)) != ordered_pair(x,y),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_corollary_1_to_OP_determines_components2_2]) ).

fof(prove_corollary_1_to_OP_determines_components2_1,axiom,
    ~ member(y,universal_class),
    file('theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_1_to_OP_determines_components2_1) ).

cnf(c_34,plain,
    ~ member(y,universal_class),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[prove_corollary_1_to_OP_determines_components2_1]) ).

fof(unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_non_sets3,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( first(VAR_0) = VAR_0
      | ordered_pair(first(VAR_0),second(VAR_0)) = VAR_0 ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_non_sets3) ).

cnf(c_40,plain,
    ( first(A) = A
    | ordered_pair(first(A),second(A)) = A ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_non_sets3]) ).

fof(unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_non_sets1,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0] :
      ( first(VAR_0) = VAR_0
      | member(ordered_pair(first(VAR_0),second(VAR_0)),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_non_sets1) ).

cnf(c_42,plain,
    ( first(A) = A
    | member(ordered_pair(first(A),second(A)),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[unique_1st_and_2nd_in_pair_of_non_sets1]) ).

fof(cartesian_product2,axiom,
    ! [VAR_0,VAR_1,VAR_2,VAR_3] :
      ( member(VAR_1,VAR_3)
      | ~ member(ordered_pair(VAR_0,VAR_1),cross_product(VAR_2,VAR_3)) ),
    file('theBenchmark.p',cartesian_product2) ).

cnf(c_182,plain,
    ( member(B,D)
    | ~ member(ordered_pair(A,B),cross_product(C,D)) ),
    inference(clausify,[status(thm)],[cartesian_product2]) ).

cnf(c_230,plain,
    ordered_pair(first(ordered_pair(x,y)),second(ordered_pair(x,y))) = ordered_pair(x,y),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_40,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_231,plain,
    member(ordered_pair(first(ordered_pair(x,y)),second(ordered_pair(x,y))),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_42,c_33]) ).

cnf(c_1770,plain,
    member(ordered_pair(x,y),cross_product(universal_class,universal_class)),
    inference(paramod,[status(thm)],[c_230,c_231]) ).

cnf(c_4339,plain,
    member(y,universal_class),
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_1770,c_182]) ).

cnf(c_4338,plain,
    $false,
    inference(resolve,[status(thm)],[c_34,c_4339]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET121-7 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v7.3.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n011.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Sat Sep 26 07:10:44 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  % Prover9 (64) version 2026-6A, July 2026, CASC-J13.
% 0.09/0.37  % Process 4051053 was started by sandbox2 on n011,
% 0.09/0.37  % Sat Sep 26 07:10:44 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % The command was "/export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/prover9 -casc 300 -f /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p".
% 0.09/0.38  
% 0.09/0.38  % From the command line: assign(max_seconds, 300).
% 6.89/1.41  
% 6.89/1.41  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 6.89/1.41  
% 6.89/1.41  % Proof 1 at 0.80 (+ 0.19) seconds.
% 6.89/1.41  % Length of proof is 9.
% 6.89/1.41  % Level of proof is 3.
% 6.89/1.41  % Maximum clause weight is 33.000.
% 6.89/1.41  % Given clauses 432.
% 6.89/1.41  
% 6.89/1.41  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark
% See solution above
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------