↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET131-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:16:39 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 5.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   46 (  23 unt;   6 nHn;  28 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   75 (  12 equ;  32 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   12 (  12 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   65 (  12 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(prove_member_of_triple2_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,set_builder(x,set_builder(u,set_builder(z,null_class)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_member_of_triple2_2) ).

cnf(definition_of_set_builder,axiom,
    union(singleton(X1),X2) = set_builder(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_of_set_builder) ).

cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(union,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).

cnf(regularity1,axiom,
    ( member(regular(X1),X1)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity1) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

cnf(prove_member_of_triple2_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_member_of_triple2_1) ).

cnf(intersection1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).

cnf(unordered_pair2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair2) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,set_builder(x,set_builder(u,set_builder(z,null_class)))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_member_of_triple2_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    union(singleton(X1),X2) = set_builder(X1,X2),
    definition_of_set_builder ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    singleton_set ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,set_builder(x,set_builder(u,set_builder(z,null_class)))),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    union(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2) = set_builder(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    union ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement2]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_25,axiom,
    ( member(regular(X1),X1)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    regularity1 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection2]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(x,x)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(z,z)),complement(null_class)))))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_21]),c_0_21]),c_0_22]),c_0_22]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,universal_class),
    prove_member_of_triple2_1 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(regular(complement(X1)),X1)
    | complement(X1) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    ( member(regular(X1),universal_class)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_34,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,intersection(complement(unordered_pair(x,x)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(z,z)),complement(null_class))))))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    null_class = complement(universal_class),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(z,z)),complement(complement(universal_class))))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection1]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(z,z)),complement(complement(universal_class)))))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_36]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_37 ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(z,z)),complement(complement(universal_class))))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_29]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,complement(unordered_pair(u,u))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_40]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair2]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,unordered_pair(u,u)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_42 ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_44]),c_0_30])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.05  % Problem  : SET131-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.07  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.42  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.15/5.42  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/5.42  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/5.42  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.15/5.42  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.15/5.42  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/5.42  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.15/5.42  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:57:06 UTC 2026
% 0.15/5.42  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/5.42  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.49  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.19/5.61  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.19/5.61  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/5.61  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 3455409 completed with status 0
% 0.19/5.61  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.19/5.61  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/5.61  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/5.61  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/5.61  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/5.61  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 3455417 completed with status 0
% 0.19/5.61  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.19/5.61  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.19/5.61  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.19/5.61  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.19/5.61  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.19/5.61  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.19/5.61  % Preprocessing time       : 0.004 s
% 0.19/5.61  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.19/5.61  
% 0.19/5.61  % Proof found!
% 0.19/5.61  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/5.61  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.19/5.61  % Parsed axioms                        : 94
% 0.19/5.61  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.19/5.61  % Initial clauses                      : 94
% 0.19/5.61  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 16
% 0.19/5.61  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 78
% 0.19/5.61  % Processed clauses                    : 167
% 0.19/5.61  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.19/5.61  % ...subsumed                          : 0
% 0.19/5.61  % ...remaining for further processing  : 166
% 0.19/5.61  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.19/5.61  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.19/5.61  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.19/5.61  % Backward-rewritten                   : 14
% 0.19/5.61  % Generated clauses                    : 134
% 0.19/5.61  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 120
% 0.19/5.61  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.19/5.61  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.19/5.61  % Paramodulations                      : 131
% 0.19/5.61  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.19/5.61  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.19/5.61  % Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.19/5.61  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.19/5.61  % Total rewrite steps                  : 42
% 0.19/5.61  % ...of those cached                   : 35
% 0.19/5.61  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.19/5.61  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.19/5.61  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.19/5.61  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.19/5.61  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.19/5.61  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.19/5.61  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.19/5.61  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.19/5.62  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.19/5.62  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.19/5.62  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.19/5.62  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.19/5.62  % Current number of processed clauses  : 71
% 0.19/5.62  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 23
% 0.19/5.62  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.19/5.62  %    Negative unit clauses             : 5
% 0.19/5.62  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 42
% 0.19/5.62  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 107
% 0.19/5.62  % ...number of literals in the above   : 275
% 0.19/5.62  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.19/5.62  % Current number of archived clauses   : 108
% 0.19/5.62  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1131
% 0.19/5.62  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 711
% 0.19/5.62  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1
% 0.19/5.62  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.19/5.62  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.19/5.62  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 10
% 0.19/5.62  % BW rewrite match successes           : 5
% 0.19/5.62  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.19/5.62  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.19/5.62  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 8050
% 0.19/5.62  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 156
% 0.19/5.62  
% 0.19/5.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/5.62  % User time                : 0.030 s
% 0.19/5.62  % System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.19/5.62  % Total time               : 0.037 s
% 0.19/5.62  % Maximum resident set size: 3976 pages
% 0.19/5.62  
% 0.19/5.62  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.19/5.62  % User time                : 0.149 s
% 0.19/5.62  % System time              : 0.029 s
% 0.19/5.62  % Total time               : 0.177 s
% 0.19/5.62  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.19/5.62  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------