↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET132-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:13:41 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.10s 0.44s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   13
%            Number of leaves      :   10
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   38 (  23 unt;   3 nHn;  25 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   56 (   7 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :   11 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   11 (  11 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   9 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_member_of_triple3_2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,set_builder(x,set_builder(y,set_builder(u,null_class)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_member_of_triple3_2) ).

cnf(definition_of_set_builder,axiom,
    union(singleton(X1),X2) = set_builder(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_of_set_builder) ).

cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).

cnf(union,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

cnf(prove_member_of_triple3_1,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_member_of_triple3_1) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(intersection1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).

cnf(unordered_pair2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair2) ).

cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,set_builder(x,set_builder(y,set_builder(u,null_class)))),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_member_of_triple3_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    union(singleton(X1),X2) = set_builder(X1,X2),
    definition_of_set_builder ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
    singleton_set ).

cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,set_builder(x,set_builder(y,set_builder(u,null_class)))),
    c_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    union(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2) = set_builder(X1,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    union ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement2]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection2]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(x,x)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(y,y)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(null_class)))))))))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,universal_class),
    prove_member_of_triple3_1 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_17 ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,intersection(complement(unordered_pair(x,x)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(y,y)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(null_class))))))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(y,y)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(null_class)))))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(y,y)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(null_class))))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,intersection(complement(unordered_pair(y,y)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(null_class)))))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(null_class))))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection1]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(null_class)))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_29 ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(null_class))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_19]),c_0_20])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    member(u,complement(unordered_pair(u,u))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair2]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ~ member(u,unordered_pair(u,u)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
    c_0_34 ).

cnf(c_0_37,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_36]),c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET132-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.36  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:55:49 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.36  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.44  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2292312 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % sh5l with pid 2292326 completed with status 0
% 0.10/0.44  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.10/0.44  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.10/0.44  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.10/0.44  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.10/0.44  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.10/0.44  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.10/0.44  
% 0.10/0.44  % Proof found!
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.10/0.44  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.45  % Parsed axioms                        : 94
% 0.10/0.45  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Initial clauses                      : 94
% 0.10/0.45  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 16
% 0.10/0.45  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 78
% 0.10/0.45  % Processed clauses                    : 151
% 0.10/0.45  % ...of these trivial                  : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % ...subsumed                          : 2
% 0.10/0.45  % ...remaining for further processing  : 149
% 0.10/0.45  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 3
% 0.10/0.45  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.10/0.45  % Backward-rewritten                   : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Generated clauses                    : 85
% 0.10/0.45  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 60
% 0.10/0.45  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 1
% 0.10/0.45  % Paramodulations                      : 82
% 0.10/0.45  % Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Equation resolutions                 : 3
% 0.10/0.45  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Total rewrite steps                  : 19
% 0.10/0.45  % ...of those cached                   : 13
% 0.10/0.45  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.10/0.45  % Current number of processed clauses  : 68
% 0.10/0.45  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 27
% 0.10/0.45  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.10/0.45  %    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.10/0.45  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 34
% 0.10/0.45  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 64
% 0.10/0.45  % ...number of literals in the above   : 161
% 0.10/0.45  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Current number of archived clauses   : 94
% 0.10/0.45  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 901
% 0.10/0.45  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 531
% 0.10/0.45  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 2
% 0.10/0.45  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 63
% 0.10/0.45  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 12
% 0.10/0.45  % BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.10/0.45  % Condensation attempts                : 151
% 0.10/0.45  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.10/0.45  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 7570
% 0.10/0.45  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 156
% 0.10/0.45  
% 0.10/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.45  % User time                : 0.017 s
% 0.10/0.45  % System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.10/0.45  % Total time               : 0.022 s
% 0.10/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 3720 pages
% 0.10/0.45  
% 0.10/0.45  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.10/0.45  % User time                : 0.083 s
% 0.10/0.45  % System time              : 0.015 s
% 0.10/0.45  % Total time               : 0.098 s
% 0.10/0.45  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.10/0.45  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------