%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET138-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:13:42 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.56s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 29 ( 17 unt; 3 nHn; 16 RR)
% Number of literals : 44 ( 7 equ; 20 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 11 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 11 ( 11 usr; 5 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 39 ( 6 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_member_of_triple_kludge2_4,negated_conjecture,
~ member(u,set_builder(u,set_builder(v,set_builder(w,null_class)))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_member_of_triple_kludge2_4) ).
cnf(definition_of_set_builder,axiom,
union(singleton(X1),X2) = set_builder(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',definition_of_set_builder) ).
cnf(singleton_set,axiom,
unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',singleton_set) ).
cnf(union,axiom,
complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).
cnf(complement2,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).
cnf(intersection1,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| member(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).
cnf(prove_member_of_triple_kludge2_1,negated_conjecture,
member(u,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_member_of_triple_kludge2_1) ).
cnf(complement1,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
cnf(unordered_pair2,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',unordered_pair2) ).
cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
~ member(u,set_builder(u,set_builder(v,set_builder(w,null_class)))),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_member_of_triple_kludge2_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
union(singleton(X1),X2) = set_builder(X1,X2),
definition_of_set_builder ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
unordered_pair(X1,X1) = singleton(X1),
singleton_set ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ member(u,set_builder(u,set_builder(v,set_builder(w,null_class)))),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
union(unordered_pair(X1,X1),X2) = set_builder(X1,X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
union ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement2]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| member(X1,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection1]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ member(u,complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(v,v)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(w,w)),complement(null_class)))))))))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_13]),c_0_13]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]),c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
member(u,universal_class),
prove_member_of_triple_kludge2_1 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
| member(X1,X2) ),
c_0_16 ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
member(u,intersection(complement(unordered_pair(u,u)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(v,v)),complement(complement(intersection(complement(unordered_pair(w,w)),complement(null_class))))))))),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
member(u,complement(unordered_pair(u,u))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[unordered_pair2]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ member(u,unordered_pair(u,u)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,unordered_pair(X1,X2)) ),
c_0_25 ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_19])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SET138-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.37 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:58:14 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.44 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.44 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.56 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.20/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 1011760 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.20/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.56 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.56 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.56 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % sh5l with pid 1011771 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.56 % Result found by sh5l
% 0.20/0.56 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.56 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.20/0.56 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.56 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.56 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.56 % Preprocessing time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.56 % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.56
% 0.20/0.56 % Proof found!
% 0.20/0.56 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.56 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.57 % Parsed axioms : 96
% 0.20/0.57 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Initial clauses : 96
% 0.20/0.57 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 16
% 0.20/0.57 % Initial clauses in saturation : 80
% 0.20/0.57 % Processed clauses : 140
% 0.20/0.57 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % ...subsumed : 1
% 0.20/0.57 % ...remaining for further processing : 139
% 0.20/0.57 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 3
% 0.20/0.57 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Generated clauses : 59
% 0.20/0.57 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 42
% 0.20/0.57 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Paramodulations : 56
% 0.20/0.57 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Equation resolutions : 3
% 0.20/0.57 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Total rewrite steps : 12
% 0.20/0.57 % ...of those cached : 4
% 0.20/0.57 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.57 % Current number of processed clauses : 57
% 0.20/0.57 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 20
% 0.20/0.57 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Negative unit clauses : 2
% 0.20/0.57 % Non-unit-clauses : 35
% 0.20/0.57 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61
% 0.20/0.57 % ...number of literals in the above : 149
% 0.20/0.57 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Current number of archived clauses : 95
% 0.20/0.57 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 945
% 0.20/0.57 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 544
% 0.20/0.57 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 1
% 0.20/0.57 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.20/0.57 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % BW rewrite match attempts : 6
% 0.20/0.57 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.20/0.57 % Condensation attempts : 140
% 0.20/0.57 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.57 % Termbank termtop insertions : 7289
% 0.20/0.57 % Search garbage collected termcells : 156
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.57 % User time : 0.027 s
% 0.20/0.57 % System time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.57 % Total time : 0.035 s
% 0.20/0.57 % Maximum resident set size: 3936 pages
% 0.20/0.57
% 0.20/0.57 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.57 % User time : 0.141 s
% 0.20/0.57 % System time : 0.029 s
% 0.20/0.57 % Total time : 0.171 s
% 0.20/0.57 % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.20/0.57 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------