%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Leo-III---1.8.0
% Problem : SET144^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:22:54 AM UTC 2026
% Result : Theorem 4.03s 2.37s
% Output : Refutation 4.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 18
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 13 unt; 0 typ; 3 def)
% Number of atoms : 154 ( 19 equ; 0 cnn)
% Maximal formula atoms : 14 ( 4 avg)
% Number of connectives : 346 ( 58 ~; 78 |; 31 &; 167 @)
% ( 0 <=>; 12 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 9 ( 4 avg)
% Number of types : 2 ( 1 usr)
% Number of type conns : 15 ( 15 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of symbols : 7 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 43 ( 18 ^; 22 !; 0 ?; 43 :)
% ( 0 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 3 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(a_type,type,
a: $tType ).
thf(sk1_decl,type,
sk1: a > $o ).
thf(sk2_decl,type,
sk2: a > $o ).
thf(sk3_decl,type,
sk3: a > $o ).
thf(sk4_decl,type,
sk4: a ).
thf(sk1_def,definition,
( sk1
= ( @+[A: a > $o] :
~ ! [B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
( ! [D: a] :
( ( A @ D )
=> ( C @ D ) )
=> ( ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( A @ D )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ( C @ D ) ) ) )
= ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( A @ D )
| ( B @ D ) )
& ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(sk2_def,definition,
( sk2
= ( @+[A: a > $o] :
~ ! [B: a > $o] :
( ! [C: a] :
( ( sk1 @ C )
=> ( B @ C ) )
=> ( ( ^ [C: a] :
( ( sk1 @ C )
| ( ( A @ C )
& ( B @ C ) ) ) )
= ( ^ [C: a] :
( ( ( sk1 @ C )
| ( A @ C ) )
& ( B @ C ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(sk3_def,definition,
( sk3
= ( @+[A: a > $o] :
~ ( ! [B: a] :
( ( sk1 @ B )
=> ( A @ B ) )
=> ( ( ^ [B: a] :
( ( sk1 @ B )
| ( ( sk2 @ B )
& ( A @ B ) ) ) )
= ( ^ [B: a] :
( ( ( sk1 @ B )
| ( sk2 @ B ) )
& ( A @ B ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ).
thf(1,conjecture,
! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
( ! [D: a] :
( ( A @ D )
=> ( C @ D ) )
=> ( ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( A @ D )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ( C @ D ) ) ) )
= ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( A @ D )
| ( B @ D ) )
& ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBOOL_PROP_44_pme) ).
thf(2,negated_conjecture,
~ ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
( ! [D: a] :
( ( A @ D )
=> ( C @ D ) )
=> ( ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( A @ D )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ( C @ D ) ) ) )
= ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( A @ D )
| ( B @ D ) )
& ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ),
inference(neg_conjecture,[status(cth)],[1]) ).
thf(3,plain,
~ ! [A: a > $o,B: a > $o,C: a > $o] :
( ! [D: a] :
( ( A @ D )
=> ( C @ D ) )
=> ( ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( A @ D )
| ( ( B @ D )
& ( C @ D ) ) ) )
= ( ^ [D: a] :
( ( ( A @ D )
| ( B @ D ) )
& ( C @ D ) ) ) ) ),
inference(defexp_and_simp_and_etaexpand,[status(thm)],[2]) ).
thf(4,plain,
! [A: a] :
( ( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
| ( sk3 @ A ) )
& ( ( ^ [B: a] :
( ( sk1 @ B )
| ( ( sk2 @ B )
& ( sk3 @ B ) ) ) )
!= ( ^ [B: a] :
( ( ( sk1 @ B )
| ( sk2 @ B ) )
& ( sk3 @ B ) ) ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[3]) ).
thf(5,plain,
! [A: a] :
( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
| ( sk3 @ A ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(6,plain,
( ( ^ [A: a] :
( ( sk1 @ A )
| ( ( sk2 @ A )
& ( sk3 @ A ) ) ) )
!= ( ^ [A: a] :
( ( ( sk1 @ A )
| ( sk2 @ A ) )
& ( sk3 @ A ) ) ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[4]) ).
thf(7,plain,
( ( ^ [A: a] :
( ( ( sk1 @ A )
| ( sk2 @ A ) )
& ( sk3 @ A ) ) )
!= ( ^ [A: a] :
( ( sk1 @ A )
| ( ( sk2 @ A )
& ( sk3 @ A ) ) ) ) ),
inference(lifteq,[status(thm)],[6]) ).
thf(8,plain,
( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
& ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
!= ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
& ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ),
inference(func_ext,[status(esa)],[7]) ).
thf(9,plain,
( ~ ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
& ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
| ~ ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
& ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ) ),
inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(11,plain,
( ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[9]) ).
thf(12,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(16,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[12]) ).
thf(51,plain,
! [A: a] :
( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ $true
| ( ( sk3 @ A )
!= ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[5,16]) ).
thf(52,plain,
! [A: a] :
( ~ ( sk1 @ A )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( ( sk3 @ A )
!= ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[51]) ).
thf(53,plain,
( ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[52:[bind(A,$thf( sk4 ))]]) ).
thf(57,plain,
~ ( sk1 @ sk4 ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[53]) ).
thf(10,plain,
( ( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
& ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
& ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(bool_ext,[status(thm)],[8]) ).
thf(19,plain,
( ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) )
& ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(cnf,[status(esa)],[10]) ).
thf(23,plain,
( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(26,plain,
( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[23]) ).
thf(20,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[19]) ).
thf(24,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[20]) ).
thf(15,plain,
( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(cnfConj,[status(thm)],[11]) ).
thf(18,plain,
( ~ ( sk2 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[15]) ).
thf(27,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ $true
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[24,18]) ).
thf(28,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 )
| ( ( sk2 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk2 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[27]) ).
thf(29,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ),
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[28:[]]) ).
thf(42,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ~ $true
| ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(paramod_ordered,[status(thm)],[26,29]) ).
thf(43,plain,
( ( sk1 @ sk4 )
| ( ( sk3 @ sk4 )
!= ( sk3 @ sk4 ) ) ),
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[42]) ).
thf(44,plain,
sk1 @ sk4,
inference(pattern_uni,[status(thm)],[43:[]]) ).
thf(65,plain,
~ $true,
inference(rewrite,[status(thm)],[57,44]) ).
thf(66,plain,
$false,
inference(simp,[status(thm)],[65]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SET144^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.08 % Command : java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.10/0.21 % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.21 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.21 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.21 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.21 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.21 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.21 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.21 % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:39:42 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.21 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.21 Running java -Xss128m -Xmx2g -Xms1g -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/leo3.jar /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p -t 300 -p --atp eprover=/export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/externals/eprover --instantiate 39
% 0.88/0.78 % [INFO] Parsing problem /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p ...
% 1.23/0.97 % [INFO] Parsing done (187ms).
% 1.23/0.99 % [INFO] Running in sequential loop mode.
% 2.04/1.40 % [INFO] eprover registered as external prover.
% 2.04/1.41 % [INFO] Scanning for conjecture ...
% 2.04/1.49 % [INFO] Found a conjecture (or negated_conjecture) and 0 axioms. Running axiom selection ...
% 2.21/1.53 % [INFO] Axiom selection finished. Selected 0 axioms (removed 0 axioms).
% 2.21/1.53 % [INFO] Problem is higher-order (TPTP THF).
% 2.21/1.54 % [INFO] Type checking passed.
% 2.21/1.54 % [CONFIG] Using configuration: timeout(300) with strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>. Searching for refutation ...
% 4.03/2.36 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
% 4.03/2.37 % Time passed: 2014ms (effective reasoning time: 1371ms)
% 4.03/2.37 % Solved by strategy<name(default),share(1.0),primSubst(3),sos(false),unifierCount(4),uniDepth(8),boolExt(true),choice(true),renaming(true),funcspec(false), domConstr(0),specialInstances(39),restrictUniAttempts(true),termOrdering(CPO)>
% 4.03/2.37 % Axioms used in derivation (0):
% 4.03/2.37 % No. of inferences in proof: 32
% 4.03/2.37 % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p : 2014 ms resp. 1371 ms w/o parsing
% 4.30/2.44 % SZS output start Refutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 4.30/2.45 % [INFO] Killing All external provers ...
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------