↑ Up

Vampire---5.0.1.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---5.0.1
% Problem  : SET144^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Sep 30 08:23:14 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 0.10s 0.26s
% Output   : Refutation 0.10s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   24
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   71 (  15 unt;   0 typ;   6 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  357 (  90 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    4 (   5 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  376 (  45   ~; 102   |;  38   &; 177   @)
%                                         (   6 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   18 (  18   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   18 (  15 usr;   9 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   48 (   0 sgn  20   !;   6   ?;  48   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(type_def_6,type,
    sTfun: ( $tType * $tType ) > $tType ).

thf(func_def_3,type,
    vOR: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    vAND: $o > $o > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    db0: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    vLAM: 
      !>[X0: $tType,X1: $tType] : ( X1 > X0 > X1 ) ).

thf(func_def_7,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK2: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_10,type,
    sK3: a ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X3 )
         => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
     => ( ( ^ [X4: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X4 )
              | ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                & ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) )
        = ( ^ [X3: a] :
              ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                | ( X0 @ X3 ) )
              & ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',cBOOL_PROP_44_pme) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           => ( X2 @ X3 ) )
       => ( ( ^ [X4: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                | ( ( X2 @ X4 )
                  & ( X1 @ X4 ) ) ) )
          = ( ^ [X3: a] :
                ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                  | ( X0 @ X3 ) )
                & ( X2 @ X3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f3,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           => ( X1 @ X3 ) )
       => ( ( ^ [X4: a] :
                ( ( X0 @ X4 )
                | ( ( X1 @ X4 )
                  & ( X2 @ X4 ) ) ) )
          = ( ^ [X5: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ X5 )
                  | ( X0 @ X5 ) )
                & ( X1 @ X5 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f2]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( X1 @ X3 )
              = $true ) )
       => ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                  & ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
                | ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
          = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
                ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                & ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                  | ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[],[f3]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ? [X2: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           != $true ) )
      & ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                & ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
       != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
              & ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                | ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o,X2: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X2 @ X3 )
           != $true ) )
      & ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( X0 @ Y0 )
                & ( X1 @ Y0 ) )
              | ( X2 @ Y0 ) ) )
       != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
              & ( ( X2 @ Y0 )
                | ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[],[f5]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ! [X3: a] :
        ( ( $true
          = ( sK1 @ X3 ) )
        | ( $true
         != ( sK2 @ X3 ) ) )
    & ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            & ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2]),skolemize(X0,sK0),skolemize(X1,sK1),skolemize(X2,sK2)],[f6]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( sK2 @ Y0 ) ) )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
          & ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( $true
       != ( sK2 @ X3 ) )
      | ( $true
        = ( sK1 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
          & ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
      @ sK3 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
            & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
          | ( sK2 @ Y0 ) )
      @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[],[f8]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK2 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            & ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK0 @ Y0 )
              & ( sK1 @ Y0 ) )
            | ( sK2 @ Y0 ) )
        @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            & ( ( sK2 @ Y0 )
              | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(xor_proxy_clausification,[],[f12]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
        & ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          | ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f14]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
        & ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          | ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f17,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
        & ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          | ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f15]) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        | ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f17]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f18]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f19]) ).

thf(f24,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f23]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        | ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f16]) ).

thf(f27,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f25]) ).

thf(f28,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f27]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
          & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
        | ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
        & ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          | ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(beta-eta_normalization,[],[f13]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( sK0 @ sK3 )
        & ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
        & ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          | ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f29]) ).

thf(f31,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
        & ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          | ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
        & ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
          | ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f30]) ).

thf(f33,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
        | ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f32]) ).

thf(f35,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(or_proxy_clausification,[],[f33]) ).

thf(f36,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f35]) ).

thf(f38,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(and_proxy_clausification,[],[f31]) ).

thf(f39,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[],[f38]) ).

thf(f43,definition,
    ( spl4_1
  <=> ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f45,plain,
    ( ( ( sK2 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f43]) ).

thf(f47,definition,
    ( spl4_2
  <=> ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f49,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f47]) ).

thf(f51,definition,
    ( spl4_3
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_3])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f53,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK3 )
      = $false )
    | ~ spl4_3 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f51]) ).

thf(f55,plain,
    ( spl4_3
    | spl4_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f24,f47,f51]) ).

thf(f56,plain,
    ( spl4_3
    | spl4_1 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f28,f43,f51]) ).

thf(f60,definition,
    ( spl4_4
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_4])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f62,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK2 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f60]) ).

thf(f64,definition,
    ( spl4_5
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_5])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f66,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f64]) ).

thf(f67,plain,
    ( spl4_4
    | spl4_5 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f36,f64,f60]) ).

thf(f68,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ),
    inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[],[f39,f9]) ).

thf(f71,definition,
    ( spl4_6
  <=> ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[spl4_6])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f73,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK1 @ sK3 ) )
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f71]) ).

thf(f75,plain,
    spl4_6,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f68,f71]) ).

thf(f77,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f73,f53]) ).

thf(f78,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f77]) ).

thf(f79,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f78]) ).

thf(f80,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f45,f62]) ).

thf(f81,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f80]) ).

thf(f82,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f81]) ).

thf(f84,plain,
    ( ( $true = $false )
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f66,f49]) ).

thf(f85,plain,
    ( $false
    | ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f84]) ).

thf(f86,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f85]) ).

cnf(s2,plain,
    ( spl4_2
    | spl4_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f55]) ).

cnf(s3,plain,
    ( spl4_1
    | spl4_3 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f56]) ).

cnf(s5,plain,
    ( spl4_4
    | spl4_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f67]) ).

cnf(s7,plain,
    spl4_6,
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f75]) ).

cnf(s9,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_3
    | ~ spl4_6 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f79]) ).

cnf(s10,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_1
    | ~ spl4_4 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f82]) ).

cnf(s11,plain,
    ( ~ spl4_2
    | ~ spl4_5 ),
    inference(sat_conversion,[],[f86]) ).

cnf(s12,plain,
    ~ spl4_3,
    inference(rat,[],[s9,s7]) ).

cnf(s14,plain,
    spl4_1,
    inference(rat,[],[s3,s12]) ).

cnf(s15,plain,
    ~ spl4_4,
    inference(rat,[],[s10,s14]) ).

cnf(s16,plain,
    spl4_5,
    inference(rat,[],[s5,s15]) ).

cnf(s17,plain,
    ~ spl4_2,
    inference(rat,[],[s11,s16]) ).

cnf(s18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(rat,[],[s2,s12,s17]) ).

thf(f87,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[s18]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET144^5 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.17  % Computer : n013.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.17  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.17  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.17  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.17  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.17  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.17  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/0.17  % DateTime : Tue Sep 29 13:36:21 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.17  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/0.17  Running run_vampire /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/0.21  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.10/0.22  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/vampire-ho --input_syntax tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode casc -m 16384 --cores 7 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115281)Detected a higher-order problem, will run a greedy HOL sequence.
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286)lrs+10_40_drc=off:e2e=on:si=on:uwa=one_side_interpreted:random_seed=3154622829:s2a=on:i=87:rtra=on:ntd=on_2999 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/87Mi)
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286) found proof, printing to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-2115281-2115286"...
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286)...printing done.
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.10/0.26  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark
% 0.10/0.26  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286)------------------------------
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286)Version: Vampire 5.0.1 (Release build, commit 5ef7c2677 on 2026-07-16 16:54:09 +0200)
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286)Linked with Z3 4.14.0.0 3c47fd96cf5645d0c42b2c819d9e9a84380aa721 z3-4.8.4-9178-g3c47fd96c
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286)CaDiCaL version: 2.1.3
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286)Peak memory usage: 13 MB
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115286)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.10/0.26  % (2115281)Success in time 0.029 s
% 0.10/0.26  % Vampire exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------