↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET146+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:07:26 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.27s 1.72s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.27s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   48 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   12 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   45 (  19   ~;  17   |;   6   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   13 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   36 (   3 sgn  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(empty_set_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',empty_set_defn) ).

fof(equal_member_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
        <=> member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_member_defn) ).

fof(prove_th61,conjecture,
    ! [X1] : intersection(X1,empty_set) = empty_set,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_th61) ).

fof(intersection_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,intersection(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_defn) ).

fof(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X1] : ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[empty_set_defn]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X25] : ~ member(X25,empty_set),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X41,X42,X43,X44,X45,X46] :
      ( ( ~ member(X43,X41)
        | member(X43,X42)
        | X41 != X42 )
      & ( ~ member(X44,X42)
        | member(X44,X41)
        | X41 != X42 )
      & ( ~ member(esk3_2(X45,X46),X45)
        | ~ member(esk3_2(X45,X46),X46)
        | X45 = X46 )
      & ( member(esk3_2(X45,X46),X45)
        | member(esk3_2(X45,X46),X46)
        | X45 = X46 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_member_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1] : intersection(X1,empty_set) = empty_set,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_th61]) ).

fof(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X22,X23,X24] :
      ( ( member(X24,X22)
        | ~ member(X24,intersection(X22,X23)) )
      & ( member(X24,X23)
        | ~ member(X24,intersection(X22,X23)) )
      & ( ~ member(X24,X22)
        | ~ member(X24,X23)
        | member(X24,intersection(X22,X23)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersection_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ~ member(X1,empty_set),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | member(esk3_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(esk4_0,empty_set) != empty_set,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])])]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X28,X29] : intersection(X28,X29) = intersection(X29,X28),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_intersection]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( empty_set = X1
    | member(esk3_2(empty_set,X1),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(esk4_0,empty_set) != empty_set,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( intersection(X1,X2) = empty_set
    | member(esk3_2(empty_set,intersection(X1,X2)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(empty_set,esk4_0) != empty_set,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    intersection(empty_set,X1) = empty_set,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET146+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.17/0.33  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.17/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.17/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:12:35 EDT 2026
% 0.17/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.17/0.35  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.27/1.72  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.27/1.72  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.27/1.72  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.27/1.72  % Total time : 1.372s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------