↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET150-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:13:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.39s 0.59s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.39s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   33 (   9 unt;   8 nHn;  20 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   66 (   8 equ;  31 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   55 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).

cnf(prove_complement_is_self_cancelling_1,negated_conjecture,
    complement(complement(x)) != x,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_complement_is_self_cancelling_1) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_9 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    not_subclass_members1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement2]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members2]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(complement(X1),X2),X1)
    | subclass(complement(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_14 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_implies_equal]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( subclass(complement(complement(X1)),X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(complement(complement(X1)),X2),X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,complement(X2)),X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    subclass(complement(complement(X1)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,complement(complement(X2))),X2)
    | subclass(X1,complement(complement(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    complement(complement(x)) != x,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_complement_is_self_cancelling_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(X1,complement(complement(X1)))
    | complement(complement(X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    subclass(X1,complement(complement(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    complement(complement(x)) != x,
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    complement(complement(X1)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29])]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET150-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.37  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/0.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/0.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.12/0.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:54:51 UTC 2026
% 0.12/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.12/0.38  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.12/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.39/0.59  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.39/0.59  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.59  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % new_bool_1 with pid 220676 completed with status 9
% 0.39/0.59  % new_bool_3 with pid 220674 completed with status 9
% 0.39/0.59  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 220673 completed with status 0
% 0.39/0.59  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.39/0.59  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.59  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.39/0.59  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.39/0.59  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.59  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % sh5l with pid 220695 completed with status 0
% 0.39/0.59  % Result found by sh5l
% 0.39/0.59  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.39/0.59  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.39/0.59  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.39/0.59  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.39/0.59  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.39/0.59  % Preprocessing time       : 0.005 s
% 0.39/0.59  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.39/0.59  
% 0.39/0.59  % Proof found!
% 0.39/0.59  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.39/0.59  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.39/0.59  % Parsed axioms                        : 113
% 0.39/0.59  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.39/0.59  % Initial clauses                      : 113
% 0.39/0.59  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 17
% 0.39/0.59  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 96
% 0.39/0.59  % Processed clauses                    : 1016
% 0.39/0.59  % ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.39/0.59  % ...subsumed                          : 542
% 0.39/0.59  % ...remaining for further processing  : 473
% 0.39/0.59  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 8
% 0.39/0.59  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.39/0.59  % Backward-subsumed                    : 14
% 0.39/0.59  % Backward-rewritten                   : 79
% 0.39/0.59  % Generated clauses                    : 3102
% 0.39/0.59  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 2527
% 0.39/0.59  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.39/0.59  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 15
% 0.39/0.59  % Paramodulations                      : 3090
% 0.39/0.59  % Factorizations                       : 4
% 0.39/0.59  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.39/0.59  % Equation resolutions                 : 8
% 0.39/0.59  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.39/0.59  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1812
% 0.39/0.59  % ...of those cached                   : 1634
% 0.39/0.59  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.39/0.59  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.39/0.59  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.39/0.59  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.39/0.59  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.39/0.59  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.39/0.59  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.39/0.59  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.39/0.59  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.39/0.59  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.39/0.59  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.39/0.59  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.39/0.59  % Current number of processed clauses  : 281
% 0.39/0.59  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 45
% 0.39/0.59  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.39/0.59  %    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.39/0.59  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 233
% 0.39/0.59  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1628
% 0.39/0.59  % ...number of literals in the above   : 4796
% 0.39/0.59  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.39/0.59  % Current number of archived clauses   : 205
% 0.39/0.59  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 14822
% 0.39/0.59  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 8721
% 0.39/0.59  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 481
% 0.39/0.59  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 705
% 0.39/0.59  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.39/0.59  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 67
% 0.39/0.59  % BW rewrite match successes           : 39
% 0.39/0.59  % Condensation attempts                : 1016
% 0.39/0.59  % Condensation successes               : 17
% 0.39/0.59  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 70011
% 0.39/0.59  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 185
% 0.39/0.59  
% 0.39/0.59  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/0.59  % User time                : 0.114 s
% 0.39/0.59  % System time              : 0.010 s
% 0.39/0.59  % Total time               : 0.124 s
% 0.39/0.59  % Maximum resident set size: 3992 pages
% 0.39/0.59  
% 0.39/0.59  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.39/0.59  % User time                : 0.696 s
% 0.39/0.59  % System time              : 0.107 s
% 0.39/0.59  % Total time               : 0.803 s
% 0.39/0.59  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.39/0.59  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------