%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SET150-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:46 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 10.04s 2.17s
% Output : CNFRefutation 10.04s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 39 ( 12 unt; 2 def)
% Number of atoms : 108 ( 10 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 71 ( 33 ~; 38 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 3 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 46 ( 0 sgn 46 !; 0 ?; 32 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( member(X2,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0)
| ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] : subclass(X0,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( X0 = X1
| ~ subclass(X1,X0)
| ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).
fof(f24,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ member(X0,X1)
| ~ member(X0,complement(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
fof(f25,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( member(X0,X1)
| member(X0,complement(X1))
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).
fof(f122,negated_conjecture,
complement(complement(x)) != x,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_complement_is_self_cancelling_1) ).
fof(f123,plain,
x != complement(complement(x)),
inference(reorient_equations,[],[f122]) ).
tcf(c_162,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( member(X2,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0)
| ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_163,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_164,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_165,plain,
! [X0: $i] : subclass(X0,universal_class),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_168,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( X0 = X1 )
| ~ subclass(X1,X0)
| ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
tcf(c_183,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ member(X0,X1)
| ~ member(X0,complement(X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).
tcf(c_184,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( member(X0,X1)
| member(X0,complement(X1))
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).
tcf(c_255,negated_conjecture,
complement(complement(x)) != x,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f123]) ).
tcf(c_2974,definition,
iPr_def_10 = complement(x),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_2975,definition,
iPr_def_11 = complement(iPr_def_10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_2976,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_11 != x,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_255,c_2974,c_2975]) ).
tcf(c_3894,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subclass(complement(X0),X1)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(complement(X0),X1),X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_163,c_183]) ).
tcf(c_3896,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ member(X0,iPr_def_10)
| ~ member(X0,x) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2974,c_183]) ).
tcf(c_3997,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( member(X0,universal_class)
| ~ member(X0,X1) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_165,c_162]) ).
tcf(c_4044,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( member(X0,iPr_def_10)
| member(X0,x)
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2974,c_184]) ).
tcf(c_4045,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( member(X0,iPr_def_11)
| member(X0,iPr_def_10)
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2975,c_184]) ).
tcf(c_4134,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),universal_class) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_163,c_3997]) ).
tcf(c_4417,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),iPr_def_10)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),x) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4134,c_4044]) ).
tcf(c_4443,plain,
( ( iPr_def_11 = x )
| ~ subclass(iPr_def_11,x)
| ~ subclass(x,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(instantiation,[status(thm)],[c_168]) ).
tcf(c_4479,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),iPr_def_11)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),iPr_def_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4134,c_4045]) ).
tcf(c_4540,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subclass(complement(iPr_def_10),X0)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(iPr_def_11,X0),iPr_def_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2975,c_3894]) ).
tcf(c_4541,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subclass(iPr_def_11,X0)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(iPr_def_11,X0),iPr_def_10) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_4540,c_2975]) ).
tcf(c_12463,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subclass(X0,x)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,x),iPr_def_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4417,c_164]) ).
tcf(c_12491,plain,
subclass(iPr_def_11,x),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_12463,c_4541]) ).
tcf(c_12574,plain,
( ( x = iPr_def_11 )
| ~ subclass(x,iPr_def_11) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_12491,c_168]) ).
tcf(c_12629,plain,
~ subclass(x,iPr_def_11),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_12574,c_2976,c_4443,c_12491]) ).
tcf(c_13254,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subclass(X0,iPr_def_11)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,iPr_def_11),iPr_def_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_4479,c_164]) ).
tcf(c_13278,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subclass(X0,iPr_def_11)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,iPr_def_11),x) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_13254,c_3896]) ).
tcf(c_13294,plain,
subclass(x,iPr_def_11),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_163,c_13278]) ).
tcf(c_13302,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_13294,c_12629]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02 % Problem : SET150-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.38 % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.38 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.38 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.38 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.38 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.38 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.38 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.09/0.38 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 10:03:34 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.38 % CPUTime :
% 0.09/0.38 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.09/0.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.09/0.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.09/0.42
% 0.09/0.42 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.09/0.42
% 0.09/0.42 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.09/0.44 % Proving...
% 10.04/2.17 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 10.04/2.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % ------ iProver source info
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 10.04/2.17 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 10.04/2.17 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 3 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 10.04/2.17 % ------ Proving...
% 10.04/2.17 % ------ Problem Properties
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 %
% 10.04/2.17 % clauses 84
% 10.04/2.17 % conjectures 1
% 10.04/2.17 % EPR 13
% 10.04/2.17 % Horn 76
% 10.04/2.17 % unary 23
% 10.04/2.17 % binary 40
% 10.04/2.17 % lits 172
% 10.04/2.17 % lits eq 28
% 10.04/2.17 % fd_pure 0
% 10.04/2.17 % fd_pseudo 0
% 10.04/2.17 % fd_cond 3
% 10.04/2.17 % fd_pseudo_cond 7
% 10.04/2.17 % AC symbols 0
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % ------
% 10.04/2.17 % Current options:
% 10.04/2.17 % ------
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 %
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % ------ Proving...
% 10.04/2.17 %
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 10.04/2.17
% 10.04/2.17
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------