↑ Up

E---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET154-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:13:45 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 10.63s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   48 (  14 unt;  12 nHn;  30 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   91 (  20 equ;  39 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   81 (  11 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(regularity1,axiom,
    ( member(regular(X1),X1)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity1) ).

cnf(intersection1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).

cnf(prove_union_with_complement_1,negated_conjecture,
    union(complement(x),x) != universal_class,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_union_with_complement_1) ).

cnf(union,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
    ( member(regular(X1),X1)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    regularity1 ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection1]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( ~ member(regular(complement(X1)),X1)
    | complement(X1) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( member(regular(X1),universal_class)
    | X1 = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members2]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement2]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    not_subclass_members1 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection2]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_implies_equal]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    complement(universal_class) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_22 ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    union(complement(x),x) != universal_class,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_union_with_complement_1]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( member(regular(intersection(X1,X2)),X1)
    | intersection(X1,X2) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_26 ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_27 ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ~ member(X1,null_class),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_28]),c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,complement(X2)),X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_31]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    union(complement(x),x) != universal_class,
    c_0_32 ).

cnf(c_0_39,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    union ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    ( ~ member(regular(intersection(complement(X1),X2)),X1)
    | intersection(complement(X1),X2) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_33]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( member(regular(intersection(X1,X2)),X2)
    | intersection(X1,X2) = null_class ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(universal_class,X1)
    | universal_class = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    subclass(X1,complement(null_class)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,negated_conjecture,
    complement(intersection(complement(complement(x)),complement(x))) != universal_class,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_39]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,plain,
    intersection(complement(X1),X1) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    complement(null_class) = universal_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_44,c_0_45]),c_0_46])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET154-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/10.40  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.13/10.40  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/10.40  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/10.40  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.13/10.40  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.13/10.40  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/10.40  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/10.40  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:56:52 UTC 2026
% 0.13/10.40  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/10.40  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/10.45  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/10.45  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.16/10.63  % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.16/10.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/10.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2048347 completed with status 0
% 0.16/10.63  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.16/10.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/10.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/10.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/10.63  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/10.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % SubtermCWHack with pid 2048353 completed with status 0
% 0.16/10.63  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.16/10.63  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/10.63  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.16/10.63  % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.16/10.63  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/10.63  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.16/10.63  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.16/10.63  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 0.16/10.63  
% 0.16/10.63  % Proof found!
% 0.16/10.63  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/10.63  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/10.64  % Parsed axioms                        : 113
% 0.16/10.64  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.16/10.64  % Initial clauses                      : 113
% 0.16/10.64  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 17
% 0.16/10.64  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 96
% 0.16/10.64  % Processed clauses                    : 1489
% 0.16/10.64  % ...of these trivial                  : 9
% 0.16/10.64  % ...subsumed                          : 852
% 0.16/10.64  % ...remaining for further processing  : 628
% 0.16/10.64  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 10
% 0.16/10.64  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.16/10.64  % Backward-subsumed                    : 11
% 0.16/10.64  % Backward-rewritten                   : 16
% 0.16/10.64  % Generated clauses                    : 6048
% 0.16/10.64  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 4853
% 0.16/10.64  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.16/10.64  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 8
% 0.16/10.64  % Paramodulations                      : 6032
% 0.16/10.64  % Factorizations                       : 6
% 0.16/10.64  % NegExts                              : 0
% 0.16/10.64  % Equation resolutions                 : 10
% 0.16/10.64  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.16/10.64  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1942
% 0.16/10.64  % ...of those cached                   : 1748
% 0.16/10.64  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.16/10.64  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.16/10.64  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/10.64  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.16/10.64  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/10.64  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.16/10.64  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.16/10.64  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.16/10.64  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.16/10.64  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.16/10.64  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.16/10.64  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.16/10.64  % Current number of processed clauses  : 597
% 0.16/10.64  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 101
% 0.16/10.64  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.16/10.64  %    Negative unit clauses             : 7
% 0.16/10.64  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 488
% 0.16/10.64  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3445
% 0.16/10.64  % ...number of literals in the above   : 9999
% 0.16/10.64  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.16/10.64  % Current number of archived clauses   : 44
% 0.16/10.64  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 21394
% 0.16/10.64  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 13931
% 0.16/10.64  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 587
% 0.16/10.64  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2068
% 0.16/10.64  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.16/10.64  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 62
% 0.16/10.64  % BW rewrite match successes           : 17
% 0.16/10.64  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.16/10.64  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.16/10.64  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 136715
% 0.16/10.64  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 185
% 0.16/10.64  
% 0.16/10.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/10.64  % User time                : 0.137 s
% 0.16/10.64  % System time              : 0.011 s
% 0.16/10.64  % Total time               : 0.148 s
% 0.16/10.64  % Maximum resident set size: 3736 pages
% 0.16/10.64  
% 0.16/10.64  % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/10.64  % User time                : 0.628 s
% 0.16/10.64  % System time              : 0.051 s
% 0.16/10.64  % Total time               : 0.680 s
% 0.16/10.64  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 0.16/10.64  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------