%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : PyRes---1.5
% Problem : SET158-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu May 9 17:39:18 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 70.30s 70.48s
% Output : Refutation 70.30s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 11 ( 7 unt; 0 nHn; 10 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 7 equ; 9 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 10 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_2,negated_conjecture,
member(z,complement(x)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_2) ).
cnf(complement1,axiom,
( ~ member(X67,complement(X66))
| ~ member(X67,X66) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
cnf(c91,plain,
~ member(z,x),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[complement1,prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_2]) ).
cnf(prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_3,negated_conjecture,
y = z,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_3) ).
cnf(reflexivity,axiom,
X2 = X2,
theory(equality) ).
cnf(prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_1,negated_conjecture,
member(y,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_1) ).
cnf(c35,axiom,
( X483 != X485
| X486 != X484
| ~ member(X483,X486)
| member(X485,X484) ),
theory(equality) ).
cnf(c4172,plain,
( y != X2185
| x != X2186
| member(X2185,X2186) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c35,prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_1]) ).
cnf(c108261,plain,
( y != X2187
| member(X2187,x) ),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c4172,reflexivity]) ).
cnf(c108271,plain,
member(z,x),
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c108261,prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_3]) ).
cnf(c108281,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[status(thm)],[c108271,c91]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : SET158-6 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13 % Command : pyres-fof.py -tifbsVp -nlargest -HPickGiven5 %s
% 0.13/0.33 % Computer : n009.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.33 % DateTime : Wed May 8 19:17:38 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 70.30/70.48 % Version: 1.5
% 70.30/70.48 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 70.30/70.48 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 70.30/70.48
% 70.30/70.48 % Initial clauses : 162
% 70.30/70.48 % Processed clauses : 2476
% 70.30/70.48 % Factors computed : 33
% 70.30/70.48 % Resolvents computed: 108248
% 70.30/70.48 % Tautologies deleted: 11
% 70.30/70.48 % Forward subsumed : 1177
% 70.30/70.48 % Backward subsumed : 6
% 70.30/70.48 % -------- CPU Time ---------
% 70.30/70.48 % User time : 69.907 s
% 70.30/70.48 % System time : 0.221 s
% 70.30/70.48 % Total time : 70.128 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------