%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : SET158-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Tue Jul 19 05:07:55 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.37s 0.55s
% Output : Refutation 0.37s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 4
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 6 ( 5 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 7 ( 1 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 4 ( 4 usr; 3 con; 0-1 aty)
% Number of variables : 2 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(complement1,axiom,
( ~ member(X,complement(Y))
| ~ member(X,Y) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
cnf(prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_1,negated_conjecture,
member(y,x),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_1) ).
cnf(prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_2,negated_conjecture,
member(z,complement(x)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_2) ).
cnf(prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_3,negated_conjecture,
y = z,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_3) ).
cnf(130,plain,
member(y,complement(x)),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_2,prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_3,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(135,plain,
$false,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[complement1,130,prove_corollary_to_complement_axiom_1]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12 % Problem : SET158-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.03/0.13 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun Jul 10 22:58:23 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.46 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.47 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.47 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.47 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.47 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.47 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 "."
% 0.20/0.47 *
% 0.20/0.47 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T22:58:23
% 0.20/0.47 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n019.cluster.edu at 2022-07-10T22:58:23
% 0.37/0.55
% 0.37/0.55
% 0.37/0.55 #||
% 0.37/0.55 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.37/0.55 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.37/0.55 ||#
% 0.37/0.55
% 0.37/0.55 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.37/0.55 ; 165 formulas have been input or derived (from 28 formulas).
% 0.37/0.55 ; 135 (82%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.37/0.55 ; 17 (13%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.37/0.55 ; 118 (87%) are still being kept.
% 0.37/0.55 ;
% 0.37/0.55 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.021 30% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.004 6% Assert (115 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.008 11% Process new row (142 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.002 3% Resolution (54 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.001 1% Paramodulation (27 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.000 0% Condensing (75 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.004 6% Forward subsumption (75 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.001 1% Backward subsumption (74 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.000 0% Clause clause subsumption (26 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.006 9% Forward simplification (142 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.000 0% Backward simplification (120 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.001 1% Ordering (46 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.022 31% Other
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.070 Total
% 0.37/0.55 ; 0.074 Real time
% 0.37/0.55 ;
% 0.37/0.55 ; Term-hash-array has 304 terms in all.
% 0.37/0.55 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 74 entries (74 at peak, 74 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.55 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 356 nodes (356 at peak, 356 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.37/0.55 ; Retrieved 29 possibly forward subsuming rows in 75 calls.
% 0.37/0.55 ; Retrieved 4 possibly backward subsumed rows in 74 calls.
% 0.37/0.55 ; Path-index has 317 entries (317 at peak, 320 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.37/0.55 ; Path-index has 1,199 nodes (1,199 at peak, 1,203 added, 4 deleted).
% 0.37/0.55 ; Trie-index has 317 entries (317 at peak, 320 added, 3 deleted).
% 0.37/0.55 ; Trie-index has 977 nodes (977 at peak, 982 added, 5 deleted).
% 0.37/0.55 ; Retrieved 63 generalization terms in 290 calls.
% 0.37/0.55 ; Retrieved 69 instance terms in 45 calls.
% 0.37/0.55 ; Retrieved 416 unifiable terms in 128 calls.
% 0.37/0.55 ;
% 0.37/0.55 ; The agenda of rows to process has 5 entries:
% 0.37/0.55 ; 1 with value 5 2 with value 7 2 with value 9
% 0.37/0.55 ; The agenda of input rows to give has 87 entries:
% 0.37/0.55 ; 8 with value 10 2 with value 18 1 with value 27
% 0.37/0.55 ; 11 with value 11 1 with value 19 2 with value 30
% 0.37/0.55 ; 8 with value 12 4 with value 20 1 with value 31
% 0.37/0.55 ; 11 with value 13 3 with value 21 1 with value 33
% 0.37/0.55 ; 7 with value 14 4 with value 22 1 with value 34
% 0.37/0.55 ; 9 with value 15 1 with value 24 2 with value 35
% 0.37/0.55 ; 3 with value 16 1 with value 26 1 with value 50
% 0.37/0.55 ; 5 with value 17
% 0.37/0.55 ; The agenda of rows to give has 3 entries:
% 0.37/0.55 ; 2 with value (4 5) 1 with value (4 7)
% 0.37/0.55 Evaluation took:
% 0.37/0.55 0.075 seconds of real time
% 0.37/0.55 0.066252 seconds of user run time
% 0.37/0.55 0.005871 seconds of system run time
% 0.37/0.55 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.37/0.55 0 page faults and
% 0.37/0.55 3,487,944 bytes consed.
% 0.37/0.55 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.55 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-07-10T22:58:23
% 0.37/0.55 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.37/0.55 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------