↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET159+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:07:28 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 44.23s 26.30s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 44.33s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   36 (  14 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   80 (  16 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  29   ~;  33   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   92 (   4 sgn  28   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(union_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,union(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        | member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn) ).

fof(prove_associativity_of_union,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] : union(union(X1,X2),X3) = union(X1,union(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_associativity_of_union) ).

fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X28,X29,X30,X31,X32] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X28,X29)
        | ~ member(X30,X28)
        | member(X30,X29) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X31,X32),X31)
        | subset(X31,X32) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X31,X32),X32)
        | subset(X31,X32) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_6,plain,
    ! [X21,X22,X23] :
      ( ( ~ member(X23,union(X21,X22))
        | member(X23,X21)
        | member(X23,X22) )
      & ( ~ member(X23,X21)
        | member(X23,union(X21,X22)) )
      & ( ~ member(X23,X22)
        | member(X23,union(X21,X22)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X3,X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X2),X3)
    | member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4)))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X2),union(X2,X3))
    | member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),union(X2,X3)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    subset(union(X1,X2),union(X2,union(X1,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

fof(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X3] : union(union(X1,X2),X3) = union(X1,union(X2,X3)),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_associativity_of_union]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4)))
    | ~ member(X1,union(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4)))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))),X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_8]) ).

fof(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    union(union(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != union(esk3_0,union(esk4_0,esk5_0)),
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])])]) ).

fof(c_0_23,plain,
    ! [X26,X27] : union(X26,X27) = union(X27,X26),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).

fof(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X24,X25] :
      ( ( subset(X24,X25)
        | X24 != X25 )
      & ( subset(X25,X24)
        | X24 != X25 )
      & ( ~ subset(X24,X25)
        | ~ subset(X25,X24)
        | X24 = X25 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( subset(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4)))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))),union(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X2),union(X3,union(X4,X1)))
    | member(esk1_2(union(X1,X2),union(X3,union(X4,X1))),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    union(union(esk3_0,esk4_0),esk5_0) != union(esk3_0,union(esk4_0,esk5_0)),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    subset(union(X1,union(X2,X3)),union(X3,union(X2,X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    union(esk5_0,union(esk3_0,esk4_0)) != union(esk3_0,union(esk4_0,esk5_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    union(X1,union(X2,X3)) = union(X3,union(X2,X1)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_30])]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    union(esk4_0,union(esk3_0,esk5_0)) != union(esk3_0,union(esk4_0,esk5_0)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    union(X1,union(X2,X3)) = union(X3,union(X1,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34]),c_0_28])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET159+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:13:59 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 44.23/26.30  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 44.23/26.30  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 44.23/26.30  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 44.23/26.30  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 44.33/26.48  % Total time : 19.404s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------