↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET159+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:16:43 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 29.83s 10.54s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 29.83s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   39 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   90 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   85 (  34   ~;  40   |;   7   &)
%                                         (   3 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   3 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  109 (   6 sgn  24   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',subset) ).

fof(union,axiom,
    ! [X3,X1,X2] :
      ( member(X3,union(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X2)
        | member(X3,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',union) ).

fof(thI09,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2,X6] : equal_set(union(union(X1,X2),X6),union(X1,union(X2,X6))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',thI09) ).

fof(equal_set,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( equal_set(X1,X2)
    <=> ( subset(X2,X1)
        & subset(X1,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET006+0.ax',equal_set) ).

fof(c_0_4,plain,
    ! [X15,X16,X17,X18,X19] :
      ( ( subset(X18,X19)
        | ~ member(esk4_2(X18,X19),X19) )
      & ( subset(X18,X19)
        | member(esk4_2(X18,X19),X18) )
      & ( member(X17,X16)
        | ~ member(X17,X15)
        | ~ subset(X15,X16) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset])])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_5,plain,
    ! [X12,X13,X14] :
      ( ( member(X12,union(X13,X14))
        | ~ member(X12,X14) )
      & ( member(X12,union(X13,X14))
        | ~ member(X12,X13) )
      & ( member(X12,X14)
        | member(X12,X13)
        | ~ member(X12,union(X13,X14)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X2)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,union(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3)
    | member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | member(esk4_2(X1,X2),X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk4_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X3)
    | subset(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk4_2(X1,union(X2,X3)),X2)
    | subset(X1,union(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X2),X3)
    | member(esk4_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | member(esk4_2(union(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk4_2(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))),X3)
    | subset(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X2),union(X1,X3))
    | member(esk4_2(union(X1,X2),union(X1,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2,X6] : equal_set(union(union(X1,X2),X6),union(X1,union(X2,X6))),
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[thI09]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    subset(union(X1,X2),union(X1,union(X2,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk4_2(X1,union(union(X2,X3),X4)),X3)
    | subset(X1,union(union(X2,X3),X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X2),union(X3,X2))
    | member(esk4_2(union(X1,X2),union(X3,X2)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_set(union(union(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),union(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_16])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X10,X11] :
      ( ( equal_set(X10,X11)
        | ~ subset(X11,X10)
        | ~ subset(X10,X11) )
      & ( ~ equal_set(X10,X11)
        | subset(X11,X10) )
      & ( ~ equal_set(X10,X11)
        | subset(X10,X11) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_set])])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,union(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk4_2(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))),X4)
    | subset(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    subset(union(X1,X2),union(union(X3,X1),X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ~ equal_set(union(union(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),union(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0))),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( ~ subset(X2,X1)
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | equal_set(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk4_2(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))),union(X2,X3))
    | subset(X1,union(X2,union(X3,X4))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X2),union(X3,union(X4,X2)))
    | member(esk4_2(union(X1,X2),union(X3,union(X4,X2))),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,union(X3,X4))
    | member(X1,union(union(X2,X3),X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk4_2(X1,union(union(X2,X3),X4)),X2)
    | subset(X1,union(union(X2,X3),X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ subset(union(union(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0),union(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0)))
    | ~ subset(union(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0)),union(union(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    subset(union(union(X1,X2),X3),union(X1,union(X2,X3))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ member(esk4_2(X1,union(union(X2,X3),X4)),union(X3,X4))
    | subset(X1,union(union(X2,X3),X4)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    ( subset(union(X1,X2),union(union(X1,X3),X4))
    | member(esk4_2(union(X1,X2),union(union(X1,X3),X4)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subset(union(esk1_0,union(esk2_0,esk3_0)),union(union(esk1_0,esk2_0),esk3_0)),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_33])]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    subset(union(X1,union(X2,X3)),union(union(X1,X2),X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_37])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.02  % Problem  : SET159+4 : TPTP v9.3.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.04  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.10/5.37  % Computer : n012.cluster.edu
% 0.10/5.37  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/5.37  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/5.37  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/5.37  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/5.37  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/5.37  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.10/5.37  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:57:15 UTC 2026
% 0.10/5.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.10/5.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.13/5.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/5.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 29.83/10.54  % Version: 3.5.1
% 29.83/10.54  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 29.83/10.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 29.83/10.54  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 29.83/10.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 29.83/10.54  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 29.83/10.54  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 29.83/10.54  % new_bool_3 with pid 1602632 completed with status 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Result found by new_bool_3
% 29.83/10.54  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 29.83/10.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 29.83/10.54  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 29.83/10.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 29.83/10.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 29.83/10.54  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 29.83/10.54  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 29.83/10.54  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 29.83/10.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 29.83/10.54  % SubtermCWHack with pid 1602635 completed with status 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 29.83/10.54  % Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 29.83/10.54  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 29.83/10.54  % Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 29.83/10.54  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 29.83/10.54  % (lift_lambdas = 0, lambda_to_forall = 0,unroll_only_formulas = 0, sine = GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0))
% 29.83/10.54  % SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 29.83/10.54  % Search class: FGUNF-FFSF22-SFFFFFNN
% 29.83/10.54  % Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 29.83/10.54  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 31s (1) cores
% 29.83/10.54  % Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 29.83/10.54  
% 29.83/10.54  % Proof found!
% 29.83/10.54  % SZS status Theorem
% 29.83/10.54  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 29.83/10.54  % Parsed axioms                        : 12
% 29.83/10.54  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 8
% 29.83/10.54  % Initial clauses                      : 10
% 29.83/10.54  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 10
% 29.83/10.54  % Processed clauses                    : 8528
% 29.83/10.54  % ...of these trivial                  : 88
% 29.83/10.54  % ...subsumed                          : 6651
% 29.83/10.54  % ...remaining for further processing  : 1789
% 29.83/10.54  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Backward-rewritten                   : 2
% 29.83/10.54  % Generated clauses                    : 295797
% 29.83/10.54  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 294246
% 29.83/10.54  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Paramodulations                      : 294933
% 29.83/10.54  % Factorizations                       : 864
% 29.83/10.54  % NegExts                              : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Total rewrite steps                  : 1490
% 29.83/10.54  % ...of those cached                   : 854
% 29.83/10.54  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 29.83/10.54  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 29.83/10.54  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 29.83/10.54  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 29.83/10.54  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 29.83/10.54  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 29.83/10.54  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 29.83/10.54  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 29.83/10.54  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 29.83/10.54  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 29.83/10.54  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 29.83/10.54  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 29.83/10.54  % Current number of processed clauses  : 1787
% 29.83/10.54  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 900
% 29.83/10.54  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 29.83/10.54  %    Negative unit clauses             : 1
% 29.83/10.54  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 886
% 29.83/10.54  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 285728
% 29.83/10.54  % ...number of literals in the above   : 725136
% 29.83/10.54  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Current number of archived clauses   : 2
% 29.83/10.54  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 488500
% 29.83/10.54  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 333560
% 29.83/10.54  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 6651
% 29.83/10.54  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 245434
% 29.83/10.54  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 78339
% 29.83/10.54  % BW rewrite match successes           : 2
% 29.83/10.54  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 29.83/10.54  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 8978543
% 29.83/10.54  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 235
% 29.83/10.54  
% 29.83/10.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 29.83/10.54  % User time                : 4.736 s
% 29.83/10.54  % System time              : 0.201 s
% 29.83/10.54  % Total time               : 4.937 s
% 29.83/10.54  % Maximum resident set size: 3648 pages
% 29.83/10.54  
% 29.83/10.54  % -------------------------------------------------
% 29.83/10.54  % User time                : 4.737 s
% 29.83/10.54  % System time              : 0.206 s
% 29.83/10.54  % Total time               : 4.942 s
% 29.83/10.54  % Maximum resident set size: 4864 pages
% 29.83/10.54  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------