%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.5.1
% Problem : SET166-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:13:47 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 5.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 17 unt; 3 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 54 ( 2 equ; 32 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 38 ( 3 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(complement1,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
cnf(prove_members_of_union1_1,negated_conjecture,
member(x,union(y,z)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_members_of_union1_1) ).
cnf(union,axiom,
complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
( ~ member(X3,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| member(X3,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).
cnf(intersection3,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).
cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
subclass(X1,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).
cnf(complement2,axiom,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).
cnf(prove_members_of_union1_3,negated_conjecture,
~ member(x,z),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_members_of_union1_3) ).
cnf(prove_members_of_union1_2,negated_conjecture,
~ member(x,y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_members_of_union1_2) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
member(x,union(y,z)),
prove_members_of_union1_1 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
union ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ~ member(X3,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| member(X3,X2) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
member(x,complement(intersection(complement(y),complement(z)))),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection3]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
( ~ member(X3,X1)
| ~ subclass(X1,X2)
| member(X3,X2) ),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
subclass(X1,universal_class),
class_elements_are_sets ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ member(x,intersection(complement(y),complement(z))),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X3)
| ~ member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
c_0_15 ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement2]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,plain,
( ~ member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,universal_class) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
~ member(x,z),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_members_of_union1_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
( ~ member(x,complement(y))
| ~ member(x,complement(z)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
| member(X1,X2)
| member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
c_0_20 ).
cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
member(x,universal_class),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
~ member(x,z),
c_0_22 ).
cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
~ member(x,y),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_members_of_union1_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
~ member(x,complement(y)),
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),c_0_26]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
~ member(x,y),
c_0_27 ).
cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_24]),c_0_25])]),c_0_29]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SET166-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05 % Command : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.12/5.37 % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/5.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/5.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/5.37 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.12/5.37 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.12/5.37 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/5.37 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/5.37 % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 05:00:23 UTC 2026
% 0.12/5.37 % CPUTime :
% 0.12/5.37 Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/5.41 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/5.41 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/5.44 % Version: 3.5.1
% 0.15/5.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2482296 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 0.15/5.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/5.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/5.44 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % SubtermCWHack with pid 2482303 completed with status 0
% 0.15/5.44 % Result found by SubtermCWHack
% 0.15/5.44 % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 0.15/5.44 % No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/5.44 % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 0.15/5.44 % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.15/5.44 % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 0.15/5.44 % Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.15/5.44
% 0.15/5.44 % Proof found!
% 0.15/5.44 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.15/5.44 % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.15/5.45 % Parsed axioms : 115
% 0.15/5.45 % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Initial clauses : 115
% 0.15/5.45 % Removed in clause preprocessing : 17
% 0.15/5.45 % Initial clauses in saturation : 98
% 0.15/5.45 % Processed clauses : 90
% 0.15/5.45 % ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % ...subsumed : 11
% 0.15/5.45 % ...remaining for further processing : 79
% 0.15/5.45 % Other redundant clauses eliminated : 2
% 0.15/5.45 % Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Backward-subsumed : 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Generated clauses : 108
% 0.15/5.45 % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 92
% 0.15/5.45 % ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Contextual simplify-reflections : 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Paramodulations : 106
% 0.15/5.45 % Factorizations : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % NegExts : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Equation resolutions : 2
% 0.15/5.45 % Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Total rewrite steps : 10
% 0.15/5.45 % ...of those cached : 3
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional check models : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of processed clauses : 75
% 0.15/5.45 % Positive orientable unit clauses : 25
% 0.15/5.45 % Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Negative unit clauses : 5
% 0.15/5.45 % Non-unit-clauses : 44
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 100
% 0.15/5.45 % ...number of literals in the above : 239
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Current number of archived clauses : 19
% 0.15/5.45 % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 222
% 0.15/5.45 % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 132
% 0.15/5.45 % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 11
% 0.15/5.45 % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 55
% 0.15/5.45 % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.15/5.45 % BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.15/5.45 % Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Condensation successes : 0
% 0.15/5.45 % Termbank termtop insertions : 5987
% 0.15/5.45 % Search garbage collected termcells : 187
% 0.15/5.45
% 0.15/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.45 % User time : 0.009 s
% 0.15/5.45 % System time : 0.007 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Total time : 0.016 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 3744 pages
% 0.15/5.45
% 0.15/5.45 % -------------------------------------------------
% 0.15/5.45 % User time : 0.038 s
% 0.15/5.45 % System time : 0.025 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Total time : 0.064 s
% 0.15/5.45 % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 0.15/5.45 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------