↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SET173^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:31:21 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.63s 1.47s
% Output   : Refutation 1.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   15
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   20 (  13 unt;   0 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   86 (  27 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    3 (   4 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  103 (  10   ~;  22   |;  13   &;  57   @)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   12 (  12   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    7 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   22 (  10   ^;   8   !;   4   ?;  22   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_8,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_9,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_11,type,
    ph3: 
      !>[X0: $tType] : X0 ).

thf(func_def_12,type,
    sK4: a ).

thf(f26,plain,
    $false,
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f25]) ).

thf(f25,plain,
    $true = $false,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f23]) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ( $true
    = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f19,plain,
    ( ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f12]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
          | ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
      = $true )
    | ( $true
      = ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
        | ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
      & ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
   != ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
   != ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
          & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
      @ sK4 ) ),
    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f9]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
          & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
   != sK0 ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
          ( ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
            | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
          & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
   != sK0 ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f7]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                | ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
              & ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
       != X0 )
   => ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( sK1 @ Y0 )
              | ( sK0 @ Y0 ) )
            & ( sK0 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != sK0 ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
              | ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
            & ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
     != X0 ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [Y0: a] :
              ( ( ( X1 @ Y0 )
                | ( X0 @ Y0 ) )
              & ( X0 @ Y0 ) ) )
        = X0 ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              & ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
        = X0 ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
              ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              & ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
        = X0 ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ( ^ [X2: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            & ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              | ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ) )
      = X0 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VqtVz6BDac/DTF2THF_17412.p',cBOOL_PROP_68_pme) ).

thf(f18,plain,
    ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
    = $false ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f16]) ).

thf(f16,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f15]) ).

thf(f15,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ( $false
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
        | ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ) ) ),
    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f14]) ).

thf(f14,plain,
    ( ( $false
      = ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
        | ( sK0 @ sK4 ) ) )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f13]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK4 )
      = $false )
    | ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK4 )
          | ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
        & ( sK0 @ sK4 ) )
      = $false ) ),
    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f11]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET173^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.18/0.34  % Computer : n026.cluster.edu
% 0.18/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.18/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.18/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.18/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.18/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.18/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 11:54:40 EST 2026
% 0.18/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.18/0.35  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.30/0.49  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.30/0.49  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.30/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.49  % File     : SET173^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.30/0.49  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.30/0.49  % Problem  : TPS problem BOOL-PROP-68
% 0.30/0.49  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.30/0.49  % English  : Trybulec's 68th Boolean property of sets
% 0.30/0.49  
% 0.30/0.49  % Refs     : [TS89]  Trybulec & Swieczkowska (1989), Boolean Properties of
% 0.30/0.49  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.30/0.49  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.30/0.49  % Names    : tps_0182 [Bro09]
% 0.30/0.49  %          : BOOL-PROP-68 [TPS]
% 0.30/0.49  
% 0.30/0.49  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.30/0.49  % Rating   : 0.00 v8.2.0, 0.08 v8.1.0, 0.00 v7.4.0, 0.11 v7.2.0, 0.00 v7.1.0, 0.12 v7.0.0, 0.14 v6.4.0, 0.17 v6.3.0, 0.20 v6.2.0, 0.00 v6.1.0, 0.14 v5.5.0, 0.17 v5.4.0, 0.20 v5.3.0, 0.40 v5.2.0, 0.20 v4.1.0, 0.00 v4.0.1, 0.33 v4.0.0
% 0.30/0.49  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   1 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.30/0.49  %            Number of atoms       :    1 (   1 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.30/0.49  %            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
% 0.30/0.49  %            Number of connectives :    5 (   0   ~;   1   |;   1   &;   3   @)
% 0.30/0.49  %                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.30/0.49  %            Maximal formula depth :    3 (   3 avg)
% 0.30/0.49  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.30/0.49  %            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.30/0.49  %            Number of symbols     :    1 (   0 usr;   0 con; 2-2 aty)
% 0.30/0.49  %            Number of variables   :    3 (   1   ^;   2   !;   0   ?;   3   :)
% 0.30/0.49  % SPC      : TH0_THM_EQU_NAR
% 0.30/0.49  
% 0.30/0.49  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.30/0.49  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.30/0.49  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.30/0.49  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.30/0.49  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.30/0.49  %          : 
% 0.30/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.49  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.30/0.49      a: $tType ).
% 0.30/0.49  
% 0.30/0.49  thf(cBOOL_PROP_68_pme,conjecture,
% 0.30/0.49      ! [X: a > $o,Y: a > $o] :
% 0.30/0.49        ( ( ^ [Xx: a] :
% 0.30/0.49              ( ( X @ Xx )
% 0.30/0.49              & ( ( X @ Xx )
% 0.30/0.49                | ( Y @ Xx ) ) ) )
% 0.30/0.49        = X ) ).
% 0.30/0.49  
% 0.30/0.49  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.30/0.49  ------------------------
% 1.63/1.44  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.63/1.44  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.63/1.44  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 11:54:41 EST 2026
% 1.63/1.44  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.63/1.44  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.63/1.44  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.63/1.44  
% 1.63/1.44  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VqtVz6BDac/DTF2DTF17412.p
% See solution above
% 1.63/1.44  ------------------------
% 1.63/1.45  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.63/1.45  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.63/1.45      a: $tType ).
% 1.63/1.45  
% 1.63/1.45  thf(cBOOL_PROP_68_pme,conjecture,
% 1.63/1.45      ! [X: a > $o,Y: a > $o] :
% 1.63/1.45        ( ( ^ [Xx: a] :
% 1.63/1.45              ( ( X @ Xx )
% 1.63/1.45              & ( ( X @ Xx )
% 1.63/1.45                | ( Y @ Xx ) ) ) )
% 1.63/1.45        = X ) ).
% 1.63/1.45  ------------------------
% 1.63/1.47  % (17514)lrs+1002_1:1_au=on:bd=off:e2e=on:sd=2:sos=on:ss=axioms:i=275:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17412 for (3000ds/275Mi)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17512)lrs+10_1:1_au=on:inj=on:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17412 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17511)dis+1010_1:1_au=on:cbe=off:chr=on:fsr=off:hfsq=on:nm=64:sos=theory:sp=weighted_frequency:i=27:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17412 for (3000ds/27Mi)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17513)lrs+1002_1:128_aac=none:au=on:cnfonf=lazy_not_gen_be_off:sos=all:i=2:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17412 for (3000ds/2Mi)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17510)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17412 for (3000ds/4Mi)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17509)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17412 for (3000ds/183Mi)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17515)lrs+1004_1:128_cond=on:e2e=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=18:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_17412 for (3000ds/18Mi)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17512)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.63/1.47  % (17512)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.47  % (17512)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17512)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.63/1.47  % (17512)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.63/1.47  % (17513)Instruction limit reached!
% 1.63/1.47  % (17513)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.47  % (17513)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17513)Termination reason: Unknown
% 1.63/1.47  % (17513)Termination phase: Saturation
% 1.63/1.47  
% 1.63/1.47  % (17513)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.63/1.47  % (17513)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.63/1.47  % (17513)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17513)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.47  % (17513)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.47  
% 1.63/1.47  % (17512)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.63/1.47  % (17512)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.63/1.47  % (17512)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17512)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.47  % (17512)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.47  % (17509)First to succeed.
% 1.63/1.47  % (17514)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.63/1.47  % (17510)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.63/1.47  % (17509)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.63/1.47  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_17412
% 1.63/1.47  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_17412
% 1.63/1.47  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(func_def_8, type, sK0: a > $o).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(func_def_9, type, sK1: a > $o).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(func_def_11, type, ph3: !>[X0: $tType]:(X0)).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(func_def_12, type, sK4: a).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f26,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    $false),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f25])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f25,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ($true = $false)),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f18,f23])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ($true = (sK0 @ sK4))),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f19,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ($true = (sK0 @ sK4)) | ($true = (sK0 @ sK4))),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f12])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ((((sK1 @ sK4) | (sK0 @ sK4)) & (sK0 @ sK4)) = $true) | ($true = (sK0 @ sK4))),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ((((sK1 @ sK4) | (sK0 @ sK4)) & (sK0 @ sK4)) != (sK0 @ sK4))),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(beta_eta_normalization,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ((sK0 @ sK4) != ((^[Y0 : a]: (((sK1 @ Y0) | (sK0 @ Y0)) & (sK0 @ Y0))) @ sK4))),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(negative_extensionality,[status(thm)],[f9])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ((^[Y0 : a]: (((sK1 @ Y0) | (sK0 @ Y0)) & (sK0 @ Y0))) != sK0)),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f8])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ((^[Y0 : a]: (((sK1 @ Y0) | (sK0 @ Y0)) & (sK0 @ Y0))) != sK0)),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1])],[f6,f7])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[Y0 : a]: (((X1 @ Y0) | (X0 @ Y0)) & (X0 @ Y0))) != X0) => ((^[Y0 : a]: (((sK1 @ Y0) | (sK0 @ Y0)) & (sK0 @ Y0))) != sK0)),
% 1.63/1.47    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[Y0 : a]: (((X1 @ Y0) | (X0 @ Y0)) & (X0 @ Y0))) != X0)),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[Y0 : a]: (((X1 @ Y0) | (X0 @ Y0)) & (X0 @ Y0))) = X0)),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) & ((X0 @ X2) | (X1 @ X2)))) = X0)),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.63/1.47    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) & ((X0 @ X2) | (X1 @ X2)))) = X0)),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.63/1.47    ! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : ((^[X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) & ((X0 @ X2) | (X1 @ X2)))) = X0)),
% 1.63/1.47    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.VqtVz6BDac/DTF2THF_17412.p',cBOOL_PROP_68_pme)).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f18,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ((sK0 @ sK4) = $false)),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f16])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f16,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ((sK0 @ sK4) = $false) | ((sK0 @ sK4) = $false)),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f15])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f15,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ((sK0 @ sK4) = $false) | ($false = ((sK1 @ sK4) | (sK0 @ sK4)))),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(duplicate_literal_removal,[status(thm)],[f14])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f14,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ($false = ((sK1 @ sK4) | (sK0 @ sK4))) | ((sK0 @ sK4) = $false) | ((sK0 @ sK4) = $false)),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f13])).
% 1.63/1.47  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.63/1.47    ((sK0 @ sK4) = $false) | ((((sK1 @ sK4) | (sK0 @ sK4)) & (sK0 @ sK4)) = $false)),
% 1.63/1.47    inference(binary_proxy_clausification,[status(thm)],[f11])).
% 1.63/1.47  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_17412
% 1.63/1.47  % (17509)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.47  % (17509)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17509)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.63/1.47  
% 1.63/1.47  % (17509)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.63/1.47  % (17509)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 1.63/1.47  % (17509)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.63/1.47  % (17509)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.47  % (17509)------------------------------
% 1.63/1.47  % (17508)Success in time 0.015 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------