↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.THM-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET173+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:07:31 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.30s 1.73s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.30s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    7
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   34 (  16 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   79 (  17 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    7 (   2 avg)
%            Number of connectives :   73 (  28   ~;  30   |;  10   &)
%                                         (   4 <=>;   1  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :   10 (   4 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   76 (   7 sgn  36   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(subset_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( subset(X1,X2)
    <=> ! [X3] :
          ( member(X3,X1)
         => member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',subset_defn) ).

fof(intersection_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,intersection(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        & member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',intersection_defn) ).

fof(union_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2,X3] :
      ( member(X3,union(X1,X2))
    <=> ( member(X3,X1)
        | member(X3,X2) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',union_defn) ).

fof(commutativity_of_intersection,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_intersection) ).

fof(equal_defn,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] :
      ( X1 = X2
    <=> ( subset(X1,X2)
        & subset(X2,X1) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',equal_defn) ).

fof(prove_absorbtion_for_intersection,conjecture,
    ! [X1,X2] : intersection(X1,union(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_absorbtion_for_intersection) ).

fof(commutativity_of_union,axiom,
    ! [X1,X2] : union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',commutativity_of_union) ).

fof(c_0_7,plain,
    ! [X37,X38,X39,X40,X41] :
      ( ( ~ subset(X37,X38)
        | ~ member(X39,X37)
        | member(X39,X38) )
      & ( member(esk1_2(X40,X41),X40)
        | subset(X40,X41) )
      & ( ~ member(esk1_2(X40,X41),X41)
        | subset(X40,X41) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(shift_quantors,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[subset_defn])])])])])]) ).

fof(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X28,X29,X30] :
      ( ( member(X30,X28)
        | ~ member(X30,intersection(X28,X29)) )
      & ( member(X30,X29)
        | ~ member(X30,intersection(X28,X29)) )
      & ( ~ member(X30,X28)
        | ~ member(X30,X29)
        | member(X30,intersection(X28,X29)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[intersection_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    ( subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( subset(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X3)
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( member(esk1_2(X1,X2),X1)
    | subset(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_7]) ).

fof(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X25,X26,X27] :
      ( ( ~ member(X27,union(X25,X26))
        | member(X27,X25)
        | member(X27,X26) )
      & ( ~ member(X27,X25)
        | member(X27,union(X25,X26)) )
      & ( ~ member(X27,X26)
        | member(X27,union(X25,X26)) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[union_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X3,X2)) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( subset(X1,intersection(X2,X1))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(X2,X1)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( member(X1,union(X3,X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).

fof(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X35,X36] : intersection(X35,X36) = intersection(X36,X35),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_intersection]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( subset(intersection(X1,X2),X3)
    | member(esk1_2(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_12]) ).

fof(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X31,X32] :
      ( ( subset(X31,X32)
        | X31 != X32 )
      & ( subset(X32,X31)
        | X31 != X32 )
      & ( ~ subset(X31,X32)
        | ~ subset(X32,X31)
        | X31 = X32 ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[equal_defn])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( subset(X1,intersection(union(X2,X3),X1))
    | ~ member(esk1_2(X1,intersection(union(X2,X3),X1)),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    intersection(X1,X2) = intersection(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_17]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    subset(intersection(X1,X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_18]) ).

fof(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1,X2] : intersection(X1,union(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[prove_absorbtion_for_intersection]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subset(X1,X2)
    | ~ subset(X2,X1) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    subset(X1,intersection(X1,union(X2,X1))),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_12]),c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    subset(intersection(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_21]) ).

fof(c_0_27,plain,
    ! [X33,X34] : union(X33,X34) = union(X34,X33),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[commutativity_of_union]) ).

fof(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(esk3_0,union(esk3_0,esk4_0)) != esk3_0,
    inference(skolemize,[status(esa)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_23])])]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    intersection(X1,union(X2,X1)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]),c_0_26])]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    union(X1,X2) = union(X2,X1),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(esk3_0,union(esk3_0,esk4_0)) != esk3_0,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    intersection(X1,union(X1,X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET173+3 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v2.2.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.16/0.33  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.16/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.16/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.16/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.16/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.16/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:12:58 EDT 2026
% 0.16/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.16/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.30/1.73  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.30/1.73  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/1.73  % SZS status Theorem for theBenchmark.p
% 1.30/1.73  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.30/1.73  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------