↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET183-6 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:07:32 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.58s 1.80s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.58s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   10
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   31 (  10 unt;   5 nHn;  22 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   59 (   5 equ;  25 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   5 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(prove_subclass_property1_1,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property1_1) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

cnf(intersection1,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).

cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).

cnf(prove_subclass_property1_2,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(x,y) != x,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property1_2) ).

cnf(c_0_8,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    subclass_members ).

cnf(c_0_9,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x,y),
    prove_subclass_property1_1 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    not_subclass_members2 ).

cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,y)
    | ~ member(X1,x) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    intersection1 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    not_subclass_members1 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    intersection3 ).

cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
    ( subclass(X1,y)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,y),x) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X1)
    | subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X3)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(intersection(x,X1),y),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,intersection(X2,X1))
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X1)),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,y)
    | ~ member(X1,intersection(x,X2)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    subclass_implies_equal ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    subclass(X1,intersection(X1,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(intersection(x,X1),X2),y)
    | subclass(intersection(x,X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    intersection(X1,X1) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23])]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(x,X1),y)
    | subclass(x,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ( subclass(x,intersection(X1,y))
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(x,intersection(X1,y)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x,intersection(x,y)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(x,y) != x,
    prove_subclass_property1_2 ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_28]),c_0_23])]),c_0_29]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : SET183-6 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.12  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.33  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.33  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.33  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:14:02 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.33  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.34  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.58/1.80  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.58/1.80  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.58/1.80  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.58/1.80  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.58/1.80  % Total time : 1.369s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------