↑ Up

DT2H2X---1.9.5.THM-Ref.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : DT2H2X---1.9.5
% Problem  : SET185^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Feb 25 09:31:23 AM UTC 2026

% Result   : Theorem 1.47s 1.25s
% Output   : Refutation 1.47s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   21 (   3 unt;   0 typ;   2 def)
%            Number of atoms       :  132 (  47 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :   10 (   6 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  136 (  23   ~;  24   |;  12   &;  61   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;  14  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   5 avg)
%            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   14 (  14   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :    8 (   5 usr;   5 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   33 (   0   ^;  22   !;  11   ?;  33   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(type_def_5,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_0,type,
    a: $tType ).

thf(func_def_4,type,
    sK0: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_5,type,
    sK1: a > $o ).

thf(func_def_6,type,
    sK2: a ).

thf(f33,plain,
    $false,
    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f22,f23,f32]) ).

thf(f32,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f30,f19,f15]) ).

thf(f15,definition,
    ( spl3_1
  <=> ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f19,definition,
    ( spl3_2
  <=> ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition]) ).

thf(f30,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f29]) ).

thf(f29,plain,
    ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( $true != $true )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f21]) ).

thf(f21,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ~ spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19]) ).

thf(f11,plain,
    ! [X3: a] :
      ( ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
       != $true )
      | ( ( sK1 @ X3 )
        = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f10,plain,
    ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
        = $true )
      | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
        = $true ) )
    & ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
     != $true )
    & ! [X3: a] :
        ( ( ( sK1 @ X3 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
         != $true ) ) ),
    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f9,f8]) ).

thf(f8,plain,
    ( ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ? [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
                = $true )
              | ( ( X0 @ X2 )
                = $true ) )
            & ( ( X1 @ X2 )
             != $true ) )
        & ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
             != $true ) ) )
   => ( ? [X2: a] :
          ( ( ( ( sK1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
              = $true ) )
          & ( ( sK1 @ X2 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( sK1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( sK0 @ X3 )
           != $true ) ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f9,plain,
    ( ? [X2: a] :
        ( ( ( ( sK1 @ X2 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( sK0 @ X2 )
            = $true ) )
        & ( ( sK1 @ X2 )
         != $true ) )
   => ( ( ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
          = $true )
        | ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
          = $true ) )
      & ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
       != $true ) ) ),
    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom]) ).

thf(f7,plain,
    ? [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
      ( ? [X2: a] :
          ( ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true ) )
          & ( ( X1 @ X2 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6]) ).

thf(f6,plain,
    ? [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ? [X3: a] :
          ( ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
              = $true )
            | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
              = $true ) )
          & ( ( X0 @ X3 )
           != $true ) )
      & ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            = $true )
          | ( ( X1 @ X2 )
           != $true ) ) ),
    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5]) ).

thf(f5,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X2 )
              = $true )
           => ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              = $true ) )
       => ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( ( ( X0 @ X3 )
                = $true )
              | ( ( X1 @ X3 )
                = $true ) )
           => ( ( X0 @ X3 )
              = $true ) ) ),
    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4]) ).

thf(f4,plain,
    ~ ! [X0: a > $o,X1: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( X1 @ X2 )
           => ( X0 @ X2 ) )
       => ! [X3: a] :
            ( ( ( X1 @ X3 )
              | ( X0 @ X3 ) )
           => ( X0 @ X3 ) ) ),
    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2]) ).

thf(f2,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
        ( ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( X0 @ X2 )
           => ( X1 @ X2 ) )
       => ! [X2: a] :
            ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
              | ( X1 @ X2 ) )
           => ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1]) ).

thf(f1,conjecture,
    ! [X1: a > $o,X0: a > $o] :
      ( ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( X0 @ X2 )
         => ( X1 @ X2 ) )
     => ! [X2: a] :
          ( ( ( X0 @ X2 )
            | ( X1 @ X2 ) )
         => ( X1 @ X2 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.E2aTFEYPvl/DTF2THF_26019.p',cBOOL_PROP_35_pme) ).

thf(f23,plain,
    ~ spl3_1,
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f12,f15]) ).

thf(f12,plain,
    ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
   != $true ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

thf(f22,plain,
    ( spl3_1
    | spl3_2 ),
    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f13,f19,f15]) ).

thf(f13,plain,
    ( ( ( sK0 @ sK2 )
      = $true )
    | ( ( sK1 @ sK2 )
      = $true ) ),
    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : SET185^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.17/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.17/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.17/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.17/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.17/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.17/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Feb 24 11:54:36 EST 2026
% 0.17/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.17/0.34  Running /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_DT2H2X /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.31/0.47  ---- Original DTF file ---
% 0.31/0.47  thf(spec,logic,$$dhol).
% 0.31/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.47  % File     : SET185^5 : TPTP v9.2.1. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.31/0.47  % Domain   : Set Theory
% 0.31/0.47  % Problem  : TPS problem BOOL-PROP-35
% 0.31/0.47  % Version  : Especial.
% 0.31/0.47  % English  : Trybulec's 35th Boolean property of sets
% 0.31/0.47  
% 0.31/0.47  % Refs     : [TS89]  Trybulec & Swieczkowska (1989), Boolean Properties of
% 0.31/0.47  %          : [Bro09] Brown (2009), Email to Geoff Sutcliffe
% 0.31/0.47  % Source   : [Bro09]
% 0.31/0.47  % Names    : tps_0112 [Bro09]
% 0.31/0.47  %          : BOOL-PROP-35 [TPS]
% 0.31/0.47  
% 0.31/0.47  % Status   : Theorem
% 0.31/0.47  % Rating   : 0.00 v5.3.0, 0.25 v5.2.0, 0.00 v4.0.0
% 0.31/0.47  % Syntax   : Number of formulae    :    2 (   0 unt;   1 typ;   0 def)
% 0.31/0.47  %            Number of atoms       :    0 (   0 equ;   0 cnn)
% 0.31/0.47  %            Maximal formula atoms :    0 (   0 avg)
% 0.31/0.47  %            Number of connectives :    9 (   0   ~;   1   |;   0   &;   5   @)
% 0.31/0.47  %                                         (   0 <=>;   3  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
% 0.31/0.47  %            Maximal formula depth :    8 (   8 avg)
% 0.31/0.47  %            Number of types       :    2 (   1 usr)
% 0.31/0.47  %            Number of type conns  :    2 (   2   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
% 0.31/0.47  %            Number of symbols     :    0 (   0 usr;   0 con; --- aty)
% 0.31/0.47  %            Number of variables   :    4 (   0   ^;   4   !;   0   ?;   4   :)
% 0.31/0.47  % SPC      : TH0_THM_NEQ_NAR
% 0.31/0.47  
% 0.31/0.47  % Comments : This problem is from the TPS library. Copyright (c) 2009 The TPS
% 0.31/0.47  %            project in the Department of Mathematical Sciences at Carnegie
% 0.31/0.47  %            Mellon University. Distributed under the Creative Commons copyleft
% 0.31/0.47  %            license: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/
% 0.31/0.47  %          : Polymorphic definitions expanded.
% 0.31/0.47  %          : 
% 0.31/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.47  thf(a_type,type,
% 0.31/0.47      a: $tType ).
% 0.31/0.47  
% 0.31/0.47  thf(cBOOL_PROP_35_pme,conjecture,
% 0.31/0.47      ! [X: a > $o,Y: a > $o] :
% 0.31/0.47        ( ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.31/0.47            ( ( X @ Xx )
% 0.31/0.47           => ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 0.31/0.47       => ! [Xx: a] :
% 0.31/0.47            ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 0.31/0.47              | ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 0.31/0.47           => ( Y @ Xx ) ) ) ).
% 0.31/0.47  
% 0.31/0.47  %------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% 0.31/0.47  ------------------------
% 1.47/1.23  ---- Embedded in THF ---
% 1.47/1.23  %%% This output was generated by embedproblem, version 1.9.5 (library version 1.9).
% 1.47/1.23  %%% Generated on Tue Feb 24 11:54:37 EST 2026
% 1.47/1.23  %%% using '$$dhol' embedding, version 1.3.0.
% 1.47/1.23  %%% Logic specification used:
% 1.47/1.23  %%% thf(spec, logic, $$dhol).
% 1.47/1.23  
% 1.47/1.23  % SZS output start ListOfTHF for /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.E2aTFEYPvl/DTF2DTF26019.p
% See solution above
% 1.47/1.23  ------------------------
% 1.47/1.24  ---- Cleaned THF ---
% 1.47/1.24  thf(a_type,type,
% 1.47/1.24      a: $tType ).
% 1.47/1.24  
% 1.47/1.24  thf(cBOOL_PROP_35_pme,conjecture,
% 1.47/1.24      ! [X: a > $o,Y: a > $o] :
% 1.47/1.24        ( ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.47/1.24            ( ( X @ Xx )
% 1.47/1.24           => ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 1.47/1.24       => ! [Xx: a] :
% 1.47/1.24            ( ( ( X @ Xx )
% 1.47/1.24              | ( Y @ Xx ) )
% 1.47/1.24           => ( Y @ Xx ) ) ) ).
% 1.47/1.24  ------------------------
% 1.47/1.25  % (26347)lrs+10_1:1_c=on:cnfonf=conj_eager:fd=off:fe=off:kws=frequency:spb=intro:i=4:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26019 for (2999ds/4Mi)
% 1.47/1.25  % (26346)lrs+1002_1:8_bd=off:fd=off:hud=10:tnu=1:i=183:si=on:rtra=on_0 on DTF2THF_26019 for (2999ds/183Mi)
% 1.47/1.25  % (26347)First to succeed.
% 1.47/1.25  % (26346)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 1.47/1.25  % (26347)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.47/1.25  % SZS status Theorem for DTF2THF_26019
% 1.47/1.25  % SZS output start Proof for DTF2THF_26019
% 1.47/1.25  thf(type_def_5, type, a: $tType).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(func_def_0, type, a: $tType).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(func_def_4, type, sK0: a > $o).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(func_def_5, type, sK1: a > $o).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(func_def_6, type, sK2: a).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f33,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    $false),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[status(thm)],[f22,f23,f32])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f32,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    spl3_1 | ~spl3_2),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f30,f19,f15])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f15,definition,(
% 1.47/1.25    spl3_1 <=> ((sK1 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.47/1.25    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_1])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f19,definition,(
% 1.47/1.25    spl3_2 <=> ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.47/1.25    introduced(definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl3_2])],[avatar_definition])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f30,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ((sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[status(thm)],[f29])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f29,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ((sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | ($true != $true) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[f11,f21])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f21,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true) | ~spl3_2),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(avatar_component_clause,[status(thm)],[f19])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f11,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ( ! [X3 : a] : (((sK0 @ X3) != $true) | ((sK1 @ X3) = $true)) )),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f10,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ((((sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true)) & ((sK1 @ sK2) != $true)) & ! [X3 : a] : (((sK1 @ X3) = $true) | ((sK0 @ X3) != $true))),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(skolemisation,[status(esa),new_symbols(skolem,[sK0,sK1,sK2])],[f7,f9,f8])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f8,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (? [X2 : a] : ((((X1 @ X2) = $true) | ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) & ((X1 @ X2) != $true)) & ! [X3 : a] : (((X1 @ X3) = $true) | ((X0 @ X3) != $true))) => (? [X2 : a] : ((((sK1 @ X2) = $true) | ((sK0 @ X2) = $true)) & ((sK1 @ X2) != $true)) & ! [X3 : a] : (((sK1 @ X3) = $true) | ((sK0 @ X3) != $true)))),
% 1.47/1.25    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f9,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ? [X2 : a] : ((((sK1 @ X2) = $true) | ((sK0 @ X2) = $true)) & ((sK1 @ X2) != $true)) => ((((sK1 @ sK2) = $true) | ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true)) & ((sK1 @ sK2) != $true))),
% 1.47/1.25    introduced(definition,[],[choice_axiom])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f7,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ? [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (? [X2 : a] : ((((X1 @ X2) = $true) | ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) & ((X1 @ X2) != $true)) & ! [X3 : a] : (((X1 @ X3) = $true) | ((X0 @ X3) != $true)))),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f6])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f6,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ? [X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o] : (? [X3 : a] : ((((X0 @ X3) = $true) | ((X1 @ X3) = $true)) & ((X0 @ X3) != $true)) & ! [X2 : a] : (((X0 @ X2) = $true) | ((X1 @ X2) != $true)))),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(ennf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f5])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f5,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (! [X2 : a] : (((X1 @ X2) = $true) => ((X0 @ X2) = $true)) => ! [X3 : a] : ((((X0 @ X3) = $true) | ((X1 @ X3) = $true)) => ((X0 @ X3) = $true)))),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(fool_elimination,[status(thm)],[f4])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f4,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ~! [X0 : a > $o,X1 : a > $o] : (! [X2 : a] : ((X1 @ X2) => (X0 @ X2)) => ! [X3 : a] : (((X1 @ X3) | (X0 @ X3)) => (X0 @ X3)))),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(rectify,[status(thm)],[f2])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f2,negated_conjecture,(
% 1.47/1.25    ~! [X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o] : (! [X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 @ X2)) => ! [X2 : a] : (((X0 @ X2) | (X1 @ X2)) => (X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(negated_conjecture,[status(cth)],[f1])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f1,conjecture,(
% 1.47/1.25    ! [X1 : a > $o,X0 : a > $o] : (! [X2 : a] : ((X0 @ X2) => (X1 @ X2)) => ! [X2 : a] : (((X0 @ X2) | (X1 @ X2)) => (X1 @ X2)))),
% 1.47/1.25    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.E2aTFEYPvl/DTF2THF_26019.p',cBOOL_PROP_35_pme)).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f23,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ~spl3_1),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f12,f15])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f12,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ((sK1 @ sK2) != $true)),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f22,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    spl3_1 | spl3_2),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(avatar_split_clause,[status(thm)],[f13,f19,f15])).
% 1.47/1.25  thf(f13,plain,(
% 1.47/1.25    ((sK0 @ sK2) = $true) | ((sK1 @ sK2) = $true)),
% 1.47/1.25    inference(cnf_transformation,[status(thm)],[f10])).
% 1.47/1.25  % SZS output end Proof for DTF2THF_26019
% 1.47/1.25  % (26347)------------------------------
% 1.47/1.25  % (26347)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 7b44b1c2f on 2025-07-15 09:50:17 +0100)
% 1.47/1.25  % (26347)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.47/1.25  
% 1.47/1.25  % (26347)Memory used [KB]: 5500
% 1.47/1.25  % (26347)Time elapsed: 0.003 s
% 1.47/1.25  % (26347)Instructions burned: 1 (million)
% 1.47/1.25  % (26347)------------------------------
% 1.47/1.25  % (26347)------------------------------
% 1.47/1.25  % (26345)Success in time 0.012 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------