↑ Up

E-SAT---3.5.1.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.5.1
% Problem  : SET185-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Sep 24 02:16:48 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 2.87s 0.84s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 2.87s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   55 (  18 unt;  10 nHn;  37 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  105 (  12 equ;  47 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   91 (   7 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(prove_subclass_property3_1,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x,y),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property3_1) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).

cnf(intersection2,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).

cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).

cnf(prove_subclass_property3_2,negated_conjecture,
    union(x,y) != y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property3_2) ).

cnf(union,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_members]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( ~ member(X3,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(X3,X2) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[not_subclass_members2]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement2]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1) ),
    not_subclass_members1 ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[complement1]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(x,y),
    prove_subclass_property3_1 ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_15 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,universal_class)
    | member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_16 ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection3]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,complement(X2)) ),
    c_0_19 ).

cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,x)
    | member(X1,y) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    ( subclass(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,complement(X2)),X2) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,X3)
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | member(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    c_0_24 ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(complement(X1),X2),X1)
    | subclass(complement(X1),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,negated_conjecture,
    ( subclass(X1,complement(x))
    | member(not_subclass_element(X1,complement(x)),y) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X3)),X3)
    | subclass(X1,intersection(X2,X3)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_28]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(complement(y),complement(x)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[intersection2]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(X2,X1)),X2)
    | subclass(X1,intersection(X2,X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(y))
    | member(X1,complement(x)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    ( ~ member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | member(X1,X3) ),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[subclass_implies_equal]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,complement(complement(X2))),X2)
    | subclass(X1,complement(complement(X2))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    union(x,y) != y,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_subclass_property3_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,intersection(complement(x),X1)),complement(y))
    | subclass(X1,intersection(complement(x),X1)) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    ( subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X3)
    | member(not_subclass_element(intersection(X1,X2),X3),X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(X2,X1)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | X1 = X2 ),
    c_0_37 ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    subclass(X1,complement(complement(X1))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_38,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    ( subclass(complement(complement(X1)),X2)
    | member(not_subclass_element(complement(complement(X1)),X2),X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_22]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    union(x,y) != y,
    c_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_46,axiom,
    complement(intersection(complement(X1),complement(X2))) = union(X1,X2),
    union ).

cnf(c_0_47,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(complement(y),intersection(complement(x),complement(y))),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,plain,
    subclass(intersection(X1,X2),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_41]) ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    ( ~ subclass(complement(complement(X1)),X1)
    | complement(complement(X1)) = X1 ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_43]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,plain,
    subclass(complement(complement(X1)),X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_51,negated_conjecture,
    complement(intersection(complement(x),complement(y))) != y,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_45,c_0_46]) ).

cnf(c_0_52,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(complement(x),complement(y)) = complement(y),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_42,c_0_47]),c_0_48])]) ).

cnf(c_0_53,plain,
    complement(complement(X1)) = X1,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_49,c_0_50])]) ).

cnf(c_0_54,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_51,c_0_52]),c_0_53])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03  % Problem  : SET185-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.05  % Command  : run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.09/0.36  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.36  % Memory   : 8046.5625MB
% 0.09/0.36  % OS       : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.09/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.09/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Sep 21 04:59:27 UTC 2026
% 0.09/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.09/0.37  Running run_E /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300 THM
% 0.15/0.41  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.15/0.41  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 2.87/0.84  % Version: 3.5.1
% 2.87/0.84  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.87/0.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2053215 completed with status 0
% 2.87/0.84  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 2.87/0.84  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.87/0.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.87/0.84  % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.87/0.84  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 2.87/0.84  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting new_bool_3 with 311s (1) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting new_bool_1 with 308s (1) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting sh5l with 304s (1) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with pid 2053223 completed with status 0
% 2.87/0.84  % Result found by C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr
% 2.87/0.84  % Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 2.87/0.84  % Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % (lift_lambdas = 1, lambda_to_forall = 1,unroll_only_formulas = 1, sine = Auto)
% 2.87/0.84  % No SInE strategy applied
% 2.87/0.84  % Search class: FGHSM-FFLM31-DFFFFFNN
% 2.87/0.84  % Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting SubtermCWHack with 136s (1) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 151s (1) cores
% 2.87/0.84  % Preprocessing time       : 0.003 s
% 2.87/0.84  % Presaturation interreduction done
% 2.87/0.84  
% 2.87/0.84  % Proof found!
% 2.87/0.84  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 2.87/0.84  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 2.87/0.84  % Parsed axioms                        : 114
% 2.87/0.84  % Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 2.87/0.84  % Initial clauses                      : 114
% 2.87/0.84  % Removed in clause preprocessing      : 17
% 2.87/0.84  % Initial clauses in saturation        : 97
% 2.87/0.84  % Processed clauses                    : 2303
% 2.87/0.84  % ...of these trivial                  : 25
% 2.87/0.84  % ...subsumed                          : 1286
% 2.87/0.84  % ...remaining for further processing  : 992
% 2.87/0.84  % Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 10
% 2.87/0.84  % Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 2.87/0.84  % Backward-subsumed                    : 29
% 2.87/0.84  % Backward-rewritten                   : 250
% 2.87/0.84  % Generated clauses                    : 6359
% 2.87/0.84  % ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5795
% 2.87/0.84  % ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 2.87/0.84  % Contextual simplify-reflections      : 20
% 2.87/0.84  % Paramodulations                      : 6343
% 2.87/0.84  % Factorizations                       : 6
% 2.87/0.84  % NegExts                              : 0
% 2.87/0.84  % Equation resolutions                 : 10
% 2.87/0.84  % Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 2.87/0.84  % Total rewrite steps                  : 2125
% 2.87/0.84  % ...of those cached                   : 1850
% 2.87/0.84  % Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 2.87/0.84  %    Propositional check models        : 0
% 2.87/0.84  %    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 2.87/0.84  %    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 2.87/0.84  %    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 2.87/0.84  %    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 2.87/0.84  %    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 2.87/0.84  %    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 2.87/0.84  %    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 2.87/0.84  %    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 2.87/0.84  %    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 2.87/0.84  %    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 2.87/0.84  % Current number of processed clauses  : 613
% 2.87/0.84  %    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 89
% 2.87/0.84  %    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 1
% 2.87/0.84  %    Negative unit clauses             : 4
% 2.87/0.84  %    Non-unit-clauses                  : 519
% 2.87/0.84  % Current number of unprocessed clauses: 3382
% 2.87/0.84  % ...number of literals in the above   : 11085
% 2.87/0.84  % Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 2.87/0.84  % Current number of archived clauses   : 392
% 2.87/0.84  % Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 87676
% 2.87/0.84  % Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 54036
% 2.87/0.84  % Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1155
% 2.87/0.84  % Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5259
% 2.87/0.84  % Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 2.87/0.84  % BW rewrite match attempts            : 259
% 2.87/0.84  % BW rewrite match successes           : 60
% 2.87/0.84  % Condensation attempts                : 0
% 2.87/0.84  % Condensation successes               : 0
% 2.87/0.84  % Termbank termtop insertions          : 291287
% 2.87/0.84  % Search garbage collected termcells   : 185
% 2.87/0.84  
% 2.87/0.84  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.87/0.84  % User time                : 0.379 s
% 2.87/0.84  % System time              : 0.017 s
% 2.87/0.84  % Total time               : 0.396 s
% 2.87/0.84  % Maximum resident set size: 3744 pages
% 2.87/0.84  
% 2.87/0.84  % -------------------------------------------------
% 2.87/0.84  % User time                : 1.799 s
% 2.87/0.84  % System time              : 0.094 s
% 2.87/0.84  % Total time               : 1.893 s
% 2.87/0.84  % Maximum resident set size: 4608 pages
% 2.87/0.84  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------