↑ Up

CSE_E---1.7.UNS-CRf.s

View TPTP
Problem
Process solution in
SystemOnTSTP
Download .tgz
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : CSE_E---1.7
% Problem  : SET189-6 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d

% Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue May  5 05:07:33 PM UTC 2026

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.37s 1.76s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.37s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   34 (  12 unt;   8 nHn;  24 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   64 (  11 equ;  29 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    8 (   8 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   44 (   4 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(subclass_members,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).

cnf(class_elements_are_sets,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).

cnf(complement1,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).

cnf(regularity1,axiom,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | member(regular(X1),X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',regularity1) ).

cnf(intersection3,axiom,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection3) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_subclass_property6_1,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(complement(y),x) = null_class,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_subclass_property6_1) ).

cnf(complement2,axiom,
    ( member(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members1,axiom,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).

cnf(subclass_implies_equal,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_subclass_property6_2,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(y,x),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_subclass_property6_2) ).

cnf(prove_corollary_to_subclass_property6_3,negated_conjecture,
    x != y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_corollary_to_subclass_property6_3) ).

cnf(not_subclass_members2,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    ( member(X3,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X3,X1) ),
    subclass_members ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    subclass(X1,universal_class),
    class_elements_are_sets ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(X2))
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    complement1 ).

cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | member(regular(X1),X1) ),
    regularity1 ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    ( member(X1,universal_class)
    | ~ member(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( complement(X1) = null_class
    | ~ member(regular(complement(X1)),X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    ( X1 = null_class
    | member(regular(X1),universal_class) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    complement(universal_class) = null_class,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,axiom,
    ( member(X1,intersection(X2,X3))
    | ~ member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,X3) ),
    intersection3 ).

cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
    intersection(complement(y),x) = null_class,
    prove_corollary_to_subclass_property6_1 ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ~ member(X1,null_class),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_19]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ member(X1,complement(y))
    | ~ member(X1,x) ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]),c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,axiom,
    ( member(X1,complement(X2))
    | member(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(X1,universal_class) ),
    complement2 ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(X1,y)
    | ~ member(X1,x) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,axiom,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X1)
    | subclass(X1,X2) ),
    not_subclass_members1 ).

cnf(c_0_27,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ subclass(X2,X1) ),
    subclass_implies_equal ).

cnf(c_0_28,negated_conjecture,
    subclass(y,x),
    prove_corollary_to_subclass_property6_2 ).

cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
    x != y,
    prove_corollary_to_subclass_property6_3 ).

cnf(c_0_30,axiom,
    ( subclass(X1,X2)
    | ~ member(not_subclass_element(X1,X2),X2) ),
    not_subclass_members2 ).

cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
    ( member(not_subclass_element(x,X1),y)
    | subclass(x,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,negated_conjecture,
    ~ subclass(x,y),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]),c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_30,c_0_31]),c_0_32]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11  % Problem    : SET189-6 : TPTP v9.2.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.11  % Command    : /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/lemma_parallel_prover %s --lemma-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cse --final-prover /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --proof-time %d --global-time-limit %d
% 0.15/0.32  % Computer : n004.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.32  % DateTime   : Tue May  5 02:15:32 EDT 2026
% 0.15/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.15/0.33  % start to proof: theBenchmark
% 1.37/1.76  % Version  : CSE_E---1.7
% 1.37/1.76  % Problem  : theBenchmark.p
% 1.37/1.76  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 1.37/1.76  % SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.37/1.77  % Total time : 1.371s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------