%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9.4
% Problem : SET190-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8046.5625MB
% OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri Sep 25 02:46:53 PM UTC 2026
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.11s 1.35s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.11s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 9
% Number of leaves : 17
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 46 ( 20 unt; 5 def)
% Number of atoms : 106 ( 16 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 71 ( 37 ~; 34 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 0 ( 0 >; 0 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 7 usr; 6 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 52 ( 0 sgn 52 !; 0 ?; 30 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( member(X2,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0)
| ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_members) ).
fof(f2,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members1) ).
fof(f3,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',not_subclass_members2) ).
fof(f4,axiom,
! [X0] : subclass(X0,universal_class),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',class_elements_are_sets) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( X0 = X1
| ~ subclass(X1,X0)
| ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',subclass_implies_equal) ).
fof(f21,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( member(X0,X1)
| ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection1) ).
fof(f22,axiom,
! [X2,X0,X1] :
( member(X0,X2)
| ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',intersection2) ).
fof(f24,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( ~ member(X0,X1)
| ~ member(X0,complement(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement1) ).
fof(f25,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( member(X0,X1)
| member(X0,complement(X1))
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',complement2) ).
fof(f26,axiom,
! [X0,X1] : complement(intersection(complement(X0),complement(X1))) = union(X0,X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/SET004-0.ax',union) ).
fof(f122,negated_conjecture,
subclass(x,y),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property7_1) ).
fof(f123,negated_conjecture,
union(complement(x),y) != universal_class,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_subclass_property7_2) ).
fof(f124,plain,
universal_class != union(complement(x),y),
inference(reorient_equations,[],[f123]) ).
fof(f187,plain,
universal_class != complement(intersection(complement(complement(x)),complement(y))),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f124,f26]) ).
tcf(c_163,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( member(X2,X1)
| ~ member(X2,X0)
| ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f1]) ).
tcf(c_164,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X0) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f2]) ).
tcf(c_165,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( subclass(X0,X1)
| ~ member(not_subclass_element(X0,X1),X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f3]) ).
tcf(c_166,plain,
! [X0: $i] : subclass(X0,universal_class),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f4]) ).
tcf(c_169,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ( X0 = X1 )
| ~ subclass(X1,X0)
| ~ subclass(X0,X1) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f7]) ).
tcf(c_181,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( member(X0,X1)
| ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f21]) ).
tcf(c_182,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i,X2: $i] :
( member(X0,X2)
| ~ member(X0,intersection(X1,X2)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f22]) ).
tcf(c_184,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( ~ member(X0,X1)
| ~ member(X0,complement(X1)) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f24]) ).
tcf(c_185,plain,
! [X0: $i,X1: $i] :
( member(X0,X1)
| member(X0,complement(X1))
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f25]) ).
tcf(c_256,negated_conjecture,
subclass(x,y),
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f122]) ).
tcf(c_257,negated_conjecture,
complement(intersection(complement(complement(x)),complement(y))) != universal_class,
inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f187]) ).
tcf(c_2981,definition,
iPr_def_10 = complement(x),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_10])],[]) ).
tcf(c_2982,definition,
iPr_def_11 = complement(iPr_def_10),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_11])],[]) ).
tcf(c_2983,definition,
iPr_def_12 = complement(y),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_12])],[]) ).
tcf(c_2984,definition,
iPr_def_13 = intersection(iPr_def_11,iPr_def_12),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_13])],[]) ).
tcf(c_2985,definition,
iPr_def_14 = complement(iPr_def_13),
introduced(definition,[new_symbols(definition,[iPr_def_14])],[]) ).
tcf(c_2986,negated_conjecture,
iPr_def_14 != universal_class,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_257,c_2983,c_2981,c_2982,c_2984,c_2985]) ).
tcf(c_2987,negated_conjecture,
subclass(x,y),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_256]) ).
tcf(c_3893,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( member(X0,iPr_def_11)
| ~ member(X0,iPr_def_13) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2984,c_181]) ).
tcf(c_3929,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( member(X0,iPr_def_12)
| ~ member(X0,iPr_def_13) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2984,c_182]) ).
tcf(c_3976,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ member(X0,iPr_def_12)
| ~ member(X0,y) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2983,c_184]) ).
tcf(c_3977,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ member(X0,iPr_def_11)
| ~ member(X0,iPr_def_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2982,c_184]) ).
tcf(c_4135,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( member(X0,y)
| ~ member(X0,x) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2987,c_163]) ).
tcf(c_4198,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( member(X0,iPr_def_10)
| member(X0,x)
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2981,c_185]) ).
tcf(c_4201,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( member(X0,iPr_def_14)
| member(X0,iPr_def_13)
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_2985,c_185]) ).
tcf(c_4234,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ( X0 = universal_class )
| ~ subclass(universal_class,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_166,c_169]) ).
tcf(c_5062,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( member(X0,iPr_def_14)
| ~ member(X0,universal_class) ),
inference(global_subsumption_just,[status(thm)],[c_4201,c_3893,c_3929,c_3977,c_3976,c_4135,c_4201,c_4198]) ).
tcf(c_5069,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( subclass(universal_class,X0)
| member(not_subclass_element(universal_class,X0),iPr_def_14) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_164,c_5062]) ).
tcf(c_5123,plain,
subclass(universal_class,iPr_def_14),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5069,c_165]) ).
tcf(c_5129,plain,
universal_class = iPr_def_14,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_5123,c_4234]) ).
tcf(c_5176,plain,
iPr_def_14 != iPr_def_14,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_2986,c_5129]) ).
tcf(c_5177,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_5176]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.03 % Problem : SET190-6 : TPTP v9.3.1. Bugfixed v2.1.0.
% 0.00/0.04 % Command : run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.10/0.52 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.52 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.52 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.52 % Memory : 8046.5625MB
% 0.10/0.52 % OS : Linux 6.8.0-71-generic
% 0.10/0.52 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.52 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.52 % DateTime : Thu Sep 24 10:11:18 UTC 2026
% 0.10/0.53 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.53 Running run_iprover 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p THM
% 0.13/0.57 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.57 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/iproveropt-multi-core.sh -d -n -l tptp -s fof_schedule -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.58
% 0.13/0.58 % ======== iProver multi-core TPTP/SMT =========
% 0.13/0.58
% 0.13/0.58 % Detected problem language: tptp
% 0.13/0.59 % Proving...
% 3.11/1.35 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.11/1.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 %---------------- iProver v3.9.4 (pre CASC 2026/SMT-COMP 2026) ----------------%
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % ------ iProver source info
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % git: date: 2026-07-19 20:42:38 +0200
% 3.11/1.35 % git: sha1: 804e7d636a263075307957e923b7a22a4035de61
% 3.11/1.35 % git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % ------ Parsing...% successful
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % ------ Clausification by vclausify_rel & Parsing by iProver...%
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe:4:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 3 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e %
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e %
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.11/1.35 % ------ Proving...
% 3.11/1.35 % ------ Problem Properties
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 %
% 3.11/1.35 % clauses 88
% 3.11/1.35 % conjectures 2
% 3.11/1.35 % EPR 14
% 3.11/1.35 % Horn 80
% 3.11/1.35 % unary 27
% 3.11/1.35 % binary 40
% 3.11/1.35 % lits 176
% 3.11/1.35 % lits eq 31
% 3.11/1.35 % fd_pure 0
% 3.11/1.35 % fd_pseudo 0
% 3.11/1.35 % fd_cond 3
% 3.11/1.35 % fd_pseudo_cond 7
% 3.11/1.35 % AC symbols 0
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % ------
% 3.11/1.35 % Current options:
% 3.11/1.35 % ------
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 %
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % ------ Proving...
% 3.11/1.35 %
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.11/1.35
% 3.11/1.35 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.11/1.35
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------